Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 73, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 53-67.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink
AU - Olivers, Christian N. L.
AU - Hilkenmeier, Frederic
AU - Scharlau, Ingrid
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - When two targets are presented in rapid succession, the first target (T1) is usually identified, but the second target (T2) is often missed. A remarkable exception to this "attentional blink" occurs when T2 immediately follows the first T1, at lag 1. It is then often spared but reported in the wrong order--that is, before T1. These order reversals have led to the hypothesis that "lag 1 sparing" occurs because the two targets merge into a single episodic representation. Here, we report evidence consistent with an alternative theory: T2 receives more attention than T1, leading to prior entry into working memory. Two experiments showed that the more T2 performance exceeded that for T1, the more order reversals were made. Furthermore, precuing T1 led to a shift in performance benefits from T2 to T1 and to an equivalent reduction in order reversals. We conclude that it is not necessary to assume episodic integration to explain lag 1 sparing or the accompanying order reversals.
AB - When two targets are presented in rapid succession, the first target (T1) is usually identified, but the second target (T2) is often missed. A remarkable exception to this "attentional blink" occurs when T2 immediately follows the first T1, at lag 1. It is then often spared but reported in the wrong order--that is, before T1. These order reversals have led to the hypothesis that "lag 1 sparing" occurs because the two targets merge into a single episodic representation. Here, we report evidence consistent with an alternative theory: T2 receives more attention than T1, leading to prior entry into working memory. Two experiments showed that the more T2 performance exceeded that for T1, the more order reversals were made. Furthermore, precuing T1 led to a shift in performance benefits from T2 to T1 and to an equivalent reduction in order reversals. We conclude that it is not necessary to assume episodic integration to explain lag 1 sparing or the accompanying order reversals.
KW - Psychology
KW - visual attention
KW - Awareness
KW - attentional blink
KW - Prior entry
KW - Order errors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951957725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/419c73f9-4006-3be2-a973-c58d4c78cac3/
U2 - 10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7
DO - 10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 73
SP - 53
EP - 67
JO - Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
JF - Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
SN - 1943-3921
IS - 1
ER -