Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink. / Olivers, Christian N. L. ; Hilkenmeier, Frederic; Scharlau, Ingrid.
in: Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, Jahrgang 73, Nr. 1, 01.2011, S. 53-67.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Olivers CNL, Hilkenmeier F, Scharlau I. Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 2011 Jan;73(1):53-67. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7

Bibtex

@article{a84c8f195188418a8985a2bc85ff8402,
title = "Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink",
abstract = "When two targets are presented in rapid succession, the first target (T1) is usually identified, but the second target (T2) is often missed. A remarkable exception to this {"}attentional blink{"} occurs when T2 immediately follows the first T1, at lag 1. It is then often spared but reported in the wrong order--that is, before T1. These order reversals have led to the hypothesis that {"}lag 1 sparing{"} occurs because the two targets merge into a single episodic representation. Here, we report evidence consistent with an alternative theory: T2 receives more attention than T1, leading to prior entry into working memory. Two experiments showed that the more T2 performance exceeded that for T1, the more order reversals were made. Furthermore, precuing T1 led to a shift in performance benefits from T2 to T1 and to an equivalent reduction in order reversals. We conclude that it is not necessary to assume episodic integration to explain lag 1 sparing or the accompanying order reversals.",
keywords = "Psychology, visual attention, Awareness, attentional blink, Prior entry, Order errors",
author = "Olivers, {Christian N. L.} and Frederic Hilkenmeier and Ingrid Scharlau",
year = "2011",
month = jan,
doi = "10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "53--67",
journal = "Attention, Perception & Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "The Psychonomic Society",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink

AU - Olivers, Christian N. L.

AU - Hilkenmeier, Frederic

AU - Scharlau, Ingrid

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - When two targets are presented in rapid succession, the first target (T1) is usually identified, but the second target (T2) is often missed. A remarkable exception to this "attentional blink" occurs when T2 immediately follows the first T1, at lag 1. It is then often spared but reported in the wrong order--that is, before T1. These order reversals have led to the hypothesis that "lag 1 sparing" occurs because the two targets merge into a single episodic representation. Here, we report evidence consistent with an alternative theory: T2 receives more attention than T1, leading to prior entry into working memory. Two experiments showed that the more T2 performance exceeded that for T1, the more order reversals were made. Furthermore, precuing T1 led to a shift in performance benefits from T2 to T1 and to an equivalent reduction in order reversals. We conclude that it is not necessary to assume episodic integration to explain lag 1 sparing or the accompanying order reversals.

AB - When two targets are presented in rapid succession, the first target (T1) is usually identified, but the second target (T2) is often missed. A remarkable exception to this "attentional blink" occurs when T2 immediately follows the first T1, at lag 1. It is then often spared but reported in the wrong order--that is, before T1. These order reversals have led to the hypothesis that "lag 1 sparing" occurs because the two targets merge into a single episodic representation. Here, we report evidence consistent with an alternative theory: T2 receives more attention than T1, leading to prior entry into working memory. Two experiments showed that the more T2 performance exceeded that for T1, the more order reversals were made. Furthermore, precuing T1 led to a shift in performance benefits from T2 to T1 and to an equivalent reduction in order reversals. We conclude that it is not necessary to assume episodic integration to explain lag 1 sparing or the accompanying order reversals.

KW - Psychology

KW - visual attention

KW - Awareness

KW - attentional blink

KW - Prior entry

KW - Order errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951957725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/419c73f9-4006-3be2-a973-c58d4c78cac3/

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7

DO - 10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 73

SP - 53

EP - 67

JO - Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 1

ER -

DOI