How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Individuals' perceptions of their own level of cognitive ability are expressed through self-estimates. They play an important role in a person's self-concept because they facilitate an understanding of how one's own abilities relate to those of others. People evaluate their own and other persons' abilities all the time, but self-estimates are also used in formal settings, such as, for instance, career counseling. We examine the relationship between self-estimated and psychometrically measured cognitive ability by conducting a random-effects, multilevel meta-analysis including a total of 154 effect sizes reported in 41 published studies. Moderator variables are specified in a mixed-effects model both at the level of the individual effect size and at the study level. The overall relationship is estimated at r =.33. There is significant heterogeneity at both levels (i.e., the true effect sizes vary within and between studies), and the results of the moderator analysis show that the validity of self-estimates is especially enhanced when relative scales with clearly specified comparison groups are used and when numerical ability is assessed rather than general cognitive ability. The assessment of less frequently considered dimensions of cognitive ability (e.g., reasoning speed) significantly decreases the magnitude of the relationship. From a theoretical perspective, Festinger's (1954) theory of social comparison and Lecky's (1945) theory of self-consistency receive empirical support. For practitioners, the assessment of self-estimates appears to provide diagnostic information about a person's self-concept that goes beyond a simple "test-and-tell" approach. This information is potentially relevant for career counselors, personnel recruiters, and teachers.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume138
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)296-321
Number of pages26
ISSN0033-2909
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2012

    Research areas

  • Psychology - Cognitive ability, meta-analysis, Psychometrics, Self-concept, Self-estimates

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Volker Birke

Publications

  1. Wie geben Tutoren Feedback?
  2. Multiple forest structural elements are needed to promote beetle biomass, diversity and abundance
  3. Jane Essex, Inclusive and Accessibe Secondary Science: How to Teach Science Effectively to Students with Additional or Special Needs (Book Review)
  4. Active Citizenship in the Planning Process
  5. Einführung in die Philosophie des Mythos
  6. Analysis of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-induced modification of protein expression in primary hepatocytes from harbour seals
  7. Bridging Restoration Science and Practice
  8. Narrative Strukturen als "Sprungbrett" in die Schriftlichkeit?
  9. Soil and tree species traits both shape soil microbial communities during early growth of Chinese subtropical forests
  10. Heteroaggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with model natural colloids under environmentally relevant conditions
  11. Introduction
  12. Special Issue: Habitual Action, Automaticity, and Control
  13. Geliebtes Geheimnis, das bin ja ich selbst
  14. Solid Sorption Refrigeration With Calcium Chloride Methanolates on Technical Scale
  15. Regionalism and Diffusion Revisited
  16. Saproxylic beetle assemblages in the Mediterranean region
  17. Feedstocks and analysis
  18. Special issue on Responsible Management Learning:
  19. Estimation of spatial distribution of wet deposition in Germany
  20. Framing climate uncertainty
  21. Reconceptualising Business-IT Alignment for Enabling Organisational Agility
  22. Herbivore and pathogen effects on tree growth are additive, but mediated by tree diversity and plant traits
  23. Tritheism
  24. Regulation of a servo piezo mechanical hydraulic actuator for intake valves in camless combustion engines