How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

Individuals' perceptions of their own level of cognitive ability are expressed through self-estimates. They play an important role in a person's self-concept because they facilitate an understanding of how one's own abilities relate to those of others. People evaluate their own and other persons' abilities all the time, but self-estimates are also used in formal settings, such as, for instance, career counseling. We examine the relationship between self-estimated and psychometrically measured cognitive ability by conducting a random-effects, multilevel meta-analysis including a total of 154 effect sizes reported in 41 published studies. Moderator variables are specified in a mixed-effects model both at the level of the individual effect size and at the study level. The overall relationship is estimated at r =.33. There is significant heterogeneity at both levels (i.e., the true effect sizes vary within and between studies), and the results of the moderator analysis show that the validity of self-estimates is especially enhanced when relative scales with clearly specified comparison groups are used and when numerical ability is assessed rather than general cognitive ability. The assessment of less frequently considered dimensions of cognitive ability (e.g., reasoning speed) significantly decreases the magnitude of the relationship. From a theoretical perspective, Festinger's (1954) theory of social comparison and Lecky's (1945) theory of self-consistency receive empirical support. For practitioners, the assessment of self-estimates appears to provide diagnostic information about a person's self-concept that goes beyond a simple "test-and-tell" approach. This information is potentially relevant for career counselors, personnel recruiters, and teachers.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftPsychological Bulletin
Jahrgang138
Ausgabenummer2
Seiten (von - bis)296-321
Anzahl der Seiten26
ISSN0033-2909
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 03.2012

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Anja Schmidt

Publikationen

  1. Strategic control over the unhelpful effects of primed social categories and goals
  2. The debate on technique in the Kunstwissenschaft around 1900
  3. Does storytelling for sustainability work? An experiment
  4. Interpersonal conflicts in executive training
  5. Regulating Vessel Discharges on the International and EU Level
  6. Socio-technical transition governance and public opinion
  7. A Framework and Typology of Ecopreneurship
  8. Publicum
  9. Towards more impactful energy research
  10. The transcultural and artscience
  11. Polarisierung der Einkommen von Selbständigen?
  12. Affect is King
  13. Liebe
  14. Simulierte Unfälle
  15. “Nationals” at Forty: From an Undefined UNCLOS Term to Due Diligence Obligations on the State of Nationality to Combat IUU Fishing
  16. Karl Mays "Weihnacht!"
  17. Anna Oppermann in der Hamburger Kunsthalle
  18. Explorix
  19. Der Racketbegriff der Kritischen Theorie
  20. Effects of free-air CO 2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on grain quality parameters and elemental composition of wheat and barley grown in a crop rotation
  21. An Estimation of the Total Benefit Value of the British Countryside for Recreational Activities
  22. Networks in Sustainable Urban Development
  23. Globales Lernen und Konsum
  24. Laypeople’s Affective Images of Energy Transition Pathways
  25. §5 Systematik des TCA
  26. Rationalitätskritik
  27. Der Sound der Macht
  28. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: a data handbook
  29. Around the World in a Jiffy
  30. Karl Mays "Winnetou"
  31. Hegemoniale Männlichkeiten
  32. Paulus
  33. § 33 Abfallvermeidungsprogramme
  34. A multiple-trait analysis of ecohydrological acclimatisation in a dryland phreatophytic shrub
  35. Lean management in hospitals
  36. Artistic research and climate science