How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis. / Hellenbrand, Johannes; Mayer, Richard E.; Opfermann, Maria et al.
In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.11.2019, p. 1147-1164.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hellenbrand J, Mayer RE, Opfermann M, Schmeck A, Leutner D. How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2019 Nov 1;33(6):1147-1164. doi: 10.1002/acp.3559

Bibtex

@article{214329de875a4a27ab36aa5064fa3d54,
title = "How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis",
abstract = "Generative drawing is a learning strategy in which students draw illustrations while reading a text to depict the content of the lesson. In two experiments, students were asked to generate drawings as they read a scientific text or read the same text on influenza with author-provided illustrations (Experiment 1) or to generate drawings or write verbal summaries as they read (Experiment 2). An examination of students' eye movements during learning showed that students who engaged in generative drawing displayed more rereadings of words, higher proportion of fixations on the important words, higher rate of transitions between words and workspace, and higher proportion of transitions between important words and workspace than students given a text lesson with author-generated illustrations (Experiment 1) or students who were asked to write a summary (Experiment 2). These findings contribute new evidence to guide theories for explaining how generative drawing affects learning processes.",
keywords = "eye tracking, generative drawing, generative learning activities, learning processes, multimedia learning, Psychology",
author = "Johannes Hellenbrand and Mayer, {Richard E.} and Maria Opfermann and Annett Schmeck and Detlev Leutner",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3559",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1147--1164",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How generative drawing affects the learning process

T2 - An eye-tracking analysis

AU - Hellenbrand, Johannes

AU - Mayer, Richard E.

AU - Opfermann, Maria

AU - Schmeck, Annett

AU - Leutner, Detlev

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Generative drawing is a learning strategy in which students draw illustrations while reading a text to depict the content of the lesson. In two experiments, students were asked to generate drawings as they read a scientific text or read the same text on influenza with author-provided illustrations (Experiment 1) or to generate drawings or write verbal summaries as they read (Experiment 2). An examination of students' eye movements during learning showed that students who engaged in generative drawing displayed more rereadings of words, higher proportion of fixations on the important words, higher rate of transitions between words and workspace, and higher proportion of transitions between important words and workspace than students given a text lesson with author-generated illustrations (Experiment 1) or students who were asked to write a summary (Experiment 2). These findings contribute new evidence to guide theories for explaining how generative drawing affects learning processes.

AB - Generative drawing is a learning strategy in which students draw illustrations while reading a text to depict the content of the lesson. In two experiments, students were asked to generate drawings as they read a scientific text or read the same text on influenza with author-provided illustrations (Experiment 1) or to generate drawings or write verbal summaries as they read (Experiment 2). An examination of students' eye movements during learning showed that students who engaged in generative drawing displayed more rereadings of words, higher proportion of fixations on the important words, higher rate of transitions between words and workspace, and higher proportion of transitions between important words and workspace than students given a text lesson with author-generated illustrations (Experiment 1) or students who were asked to write a summary (Experiment 2). These findings contribute new evidence to guide theories for explaining how generative drawing affects learning processes.

KW - eye tracking

KW - generative drawing

KW - generative learning activities

KW - learning processes

KW - multimedia learning

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066885346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.3559

DO - 10.1002/acp.3559

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85066885346

VL - 33

SP - 1147

EP - 1164

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 6

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Operational integration of EMIS and ERP systems
  2. A model of a servo piezo mechanical hydraulic actuator and its regulation using repetitive control
  3. Factored MDPs for detecting topics of user sessions
  4. How secondary-school students deal with issues of sustainable development in class*
  5. Programmierung einer DELTA-Roboterzelle nach PackML Standard
  6. ENVISIONING PROTECTED AREAS THROUGH PARTICIPATORY SCENARIO PLANNING: NAVIGATING COVERAGE AND EFFECTIVENESS CHALLENGES AHEAD
  7. Extension of SEIR compartmental models for constructive Lyapunov control of COVID-19 and analysis in terms of practical stability
  8. Combining Model Predictive and Adaptive Control for an Atomic Force Microscope Piezo-Scanner-Cantilever System
  9. A Control of an Electromagnetic Actuator Using Model Predictive Control
  10. Investigating quality raters' performance using interface evaluation methods
  11. Effects of plyometric training on postural control in static and dynamic testing situations
  12. Distributable Modular Software Framework for Manufacturing Systems
  13. Emancipative Values and Non-violent Protest
  14. Public Value: rethinking value creation
  15. Enacting migration through data practices
  16. Learning from Erroneous Examples
  17. Within-individual leaf trait variation increases with phenotypic integration in a subtropical tree diversity experiment
  18. Principals between exploitation and exploration
  19. Leaf trait variation within individuals mediates the relationship between tree species richness and productivity
  20. Embarrassment as a public vs. private emotion and symbolic coping behaviour
  21. Glancing into the Applied Tool Box
  22. Conceptions of problem solving mathematics teaching
  23. Modernizing persistence–bioaccumulation–toxicity (PBT) assessment with high throughput animal-free methods
  24. Different facets of tree sapling diversity influence browsing intensity by deer dependent on spatial scale
  25. The representative turn in EU studies
  26. Effects Of Different Order Processing Strategies On Operating Curves Of Logistic Models
  27. A Comparative Study for Fisheye Image Classification
  28. An intersection test for the cointegrating rank in dependent panel data
  29. Improvements and future challenges for the research infrastructure in the field firm level data
  30. Investigation of compression behavior of Mg-4Zn-2(Nd, Gd)-0.5Zr at 350°C by in situ synchrotron radiation diffraction
  31. Industry 4.0 more than a challenge in modeling, identification, and control for cyber-physical systems