How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis. / Hellenbrand, Johannes; Mayer, Richard E.; Opfermann, Maria et al.
in: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Jahrgang 33, Nr. 6, 01.11.2019, S. 1147-1164.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hellenbrand J, Mayer RE, Opfermann M, Schmeck A, Leutner D. How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2019 Nov 1;33(6):1147-1164. doi: 10.1002/acp.3559

Bibtex

@article{214329de875a4a27ab36aa5064fa3d54,
title = "How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis",
abstract = "Generative drawing is a learning strategy in which students draw illustrations while reading a text to depict the content of the lesson. In two experiments, students were asked to generate drawings as they read a scientific text or read the same text on influenza with author-provided illustrations (Experiment 1) or to generate drawings or write verbal summaries as they read (Experiment 2). An examination of students' eye movements during learning showed that students who engaged in generative drawing displayed more rereadings of words, higher proportion of fixations on the important words, higher rate of transitions between words and workspace, and higher proportion of transitions between important words and workspace than students given a text lesson with author-generated illustrations (Experiment 1) or students who were asked to write a summary (Experiment 2). These findings contribute new evidence to guide theories for explaining how generative drawing affects learning processes.",
keywords = "eye tracking, generative drawing, generative learning activities, learning processes, multimedia learning, Psychology",
author = "Johannes Hellenbrand and Mayer, {Richard E.} and Maria Opfermann and Annett Schmeck and Detlev Leutner",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3559",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1147--1164",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How generative drawing affects the learning process

T2 - An eye-tracking analysis

AU - Hellenbrand, Johannes

AU - Mayer, Richard E.

AU - Opfermann, Maria

AU - Schmeck, Annett

AU - Leutner, Detlev

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Generative drawing is a learning strategy in which students draw illustrations while reading a text to depict the content of the lesson. In two experiments, students were asked to generate drawings as they read a scientific text or read the same text on influenza with author-provided illustrations (Experiment 1) or to generate drawings or write verbal summaries as they read (Experiment 2). An examination of students' eye movements during learning showed that students who engaged in generative drawing displayed more rereadings of words, higher proportion of fixations on the important words, higher rate of transitions between words and workspace, and higher proportion of transitions between important words and workspace than students given a text lesson with author-generated illustrations (Experiment 1) or students who were asked to write a summary (Experiment 2). These findings contribute new evidence to guide theories for explaining how generative drawing affects learning processes.

AB - Generative drawing is a learning strategy in which students draw illustrations while reading a text to depict the content of the lesson. In two experiments, students were asked to generate drawings as they read a scientific text or read the same text on influenza with author-provided illustrations (Experiment 1) or to generate drawings or write verbal summaries as they read (Experiment 2). An examination of students' eye movements during learning showed that students who engaged in generative drawing displayed more rereadings of words, higher proportion of fixations on the important words, higher rate of transitions between words and workspace, and higher proportion of transitions between important words and workspace than students given a text lesson with author-generated illustrations (Experiment 1) or students who were asked to write a summary (Experiment 2). These findings contribute new evidence to guide theories for explaining how generative drawing affects learning processes.

KW - eye tracking

KW - generative drawing

KW - generative learning activities

KW - learning processes

KW - multimedia learning

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066885346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.3559

DO - 10.1002/acp.3559

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85066885346

VL - 33

SP - 1147

EP - 1164

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 6

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Is There a Way Back or Can the Internet Remember its Own History?
  2. Introduction: A strategy for overcoming the definitional struggle
  3. Language Model Transformers as Evaluators for Open-domain Dialogues
  4. Citizen relationship management
  5. A tale of scale: Plot but not neighbourhood tree diversity increases leaf litter ant diversity
  6. A generalized α-level decomposition concept for numerical fuzzy calculus
  7. Calculating the True Profitability of Pollution Prevention
  8. Trust in scientists, risk perception, conspiratorial beliefs, and unrealistic optimism
  9. Mapping Amazon's logistical footprint on the Ruhr
  10. Scientific and local ecological knowledge, shaping perceptions towards protected areas and related ecosystem services
  11. Introduction
  12. Do better pre-migration skills accelerate immigrants’ wage assimilation?
  13. How selective are real wage cuts?
  14. Promoting diversity of thought: bridging knowledge systems for a pluriverse approach to research
  15. Interventionen im Datenraum
  16. What is normal?
  17. rudimentäre Schreibung
  18. Designing an AI Governance Framework
  19. Innovative approaches in mathematical modeling
  20. Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence
  21. What can be learnt from the brazilian cerrado?
  22. Acquisitional pragmatics
  23. The influence of a consequence on the readiness potential preceding a self-initiated motor act
  24. Elevated temperature and varied load response of AS41 at bolted joint
  25. An automated, modular system for organic waste utilization using heterotrophic alga Galdieria sulphuraria
  26. Armed to Kill
  27. Internet of Things-Specific Challenges for Enterprise Architectures
  28. Prologue: Analyzing the Fine Details of Political Commitment
  29. Fehler und Versuch. Parteispenden und ihre Regulierung
  30. Proactivity and Adaptability
  31. Management guidelines to address cultural challenges and facilitate values-based innovation through gamification
  32. Processability of Mg-Gd Powder via Friction Extrusion
  33. Turing-Medien
  34. Walking Text and Writing Space
  35. Activity-based working
  36. Direct and Mn-Controlled Indirect Iron Oxidation by Leptothrix discophora SS-1 and Leptothrix cholodnii