How General is Trust in "Most People" ? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

How General is Trust in "Most People" ? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem. / Delhey, Jan; Newton, Kenneth; Welzel, Christian.
In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 76, No. 5, 01.10.2011, p. 786-807.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Delhey J, Newton K, Welzel C. How General is Trust in "Most People" ? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem. American Sociological Review. 2011 Oct 1;76(5):786-807. doi: 10.1177/0003122411420817

Bibtex

@article{8631b5f5ef9f4c17a78de437e33122d8,
title = "How General is Trust in {"}Most People{"} ?: Solving the Radius of Trust Problem",
abstract = "Generalized trust has become a paramount topic throughout the social sciences, in its own right and as the key civic component of social capital. To date, cross-national research relies on the standard question: {"}Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people?{"} Yet the radius problem-that is, how wide a circle of others respondents imagine as {"}most people{"}-makes comparisons between individuals and countries problematic. Until now, much about the radius problem has been speculation, but data for 51 countries from the latest World Values Survey make it possible to estimate how wide the trust radius actually is. We do this by relating responses to the standard trust question to a new battery of items that measures in-group and out-group trust. In 41 out of 51 countries, {"}most people{"} in the standard question predominantly connotes out-groups. To this extent, it is a valid measure of general trust in others. Nevertheless, the radius of {"}most people{"} varies considerably across countries; it is substantially narrower in Confucian countries and wider in wealthy countries. Some country rankings on trust thus change dramatically when the standard question is replaced by a radius-adjusted trust score. In cross-country regressions, the radius of trust matters for civic attitudes and behaviors because the assumed civic nature of trust depends on a wide radius.",
keywords = "Politics, civicness, general trust, in-group/out-group trust, social capital, trust radius, Gender and Diversity",
author = "Jan Delhey and Kenneth Newton and Christian Welzel",
year = "2011",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0003122411420817",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "786--807",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How General is Trust in "Most People" ?

T2 - Solving the Radius of Trust Problem

AU - Delhey, Jan

AU - Newton, Kenneth

AU - Welzel, Christian

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Generalized trust has become a paramount topic throughout the social sciences, in its own right and as the key civic component of social capital. To date, cross-national research relies on the standard question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people?" Yet the radius problem-that is, how wide a circle of others respondents imagine as "most people"-makes comparisons between individuals and countries problematic. Until now, much about the radius problem has been speculation, but data for 51 countries from the latest World Values Survey make it possible to estimate how wide the trust radius actually is. We do this by relating responses to the standard trust question to a new battery of items that measures in-group and out-group trust. In 41 out of 51 countries, "most people" in the standard question predominantly connotes out-groups. To this extent, it is a valid measure of general trust in others. Nevertheless, the radius of "most people" varies considerably across countries; it is substantially narrower in Confucian countries and wider in wealthy countries. Some country rankings on trust thus change dramatically when the standard question is replaced by a radius-adjusted trust score. In cross-country regressions, the radius of trust matters for civic attitudes and behaviors because the assumed civic nature of trust depends on a wide radius.

AB - Generalized trust has become a paramount topic throughout the social sciences, in its own right and as the key civic component of social capital. To date, cross-national research relies on the standard question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people?" Yet the radius problem-that is, how wide a circle of others respondents imagine as "most people"-makes comparisons between individuals and countries problematic. Until now, much about the radius problem has been speculation, but data for 51 countries from the latest World Values Survey make it possible to estimate how wide the trust radius actually is. We do this by relating responses to the standard trust question to a new battery of items that measures in-group and out-group trust. In 41 out of 51 countries, "most people" in the standard question predominantly connotes out-groups. To this extent, it is a valid measure of general trust in others. Nevertheless, the radius of "most people" varies considerably across countries; it is substantially narrower in Confucian countries and wider in wealthy countries. Some country rankings on trust thus change dramatically when the standard question is replaced by a radius-adjusted trust score. In cross-country regressions, the radius of trust matters for civic attitudes and behaviors because the assumed civic nature of trust depends on a wide radius.

KW - Politics

KW - civicness

KW - general trust

KW - in-group/out-group trust

KW - social capital

KW - trust radius

KW - Gender and Diversity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992258618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003122411420817

DO - 10.1177/0003122411420817

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 76

SP - 786

EP - 807

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 5

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Sacred Channels
  2. Tree genetic diversity increases arthropod diversity in willow short rotation coppice
  3. Shitstorm-Prävention
  4. Grundkonzeption eines produktbezogenen Top-Runner Modells auf der EU-Ebene
  5. "Sustainable University"
  6. Identification of ozonation by-products of 4- and 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole during the treatment of surface water to drinking water
  7. 'Liebe' oder 'Nähe' als Erziehungsmittel
  8. Introduction
  9. Abschied vom Zelluloid?
  10. Pollination of apple variaties across Europe: Dependecy on cross pollination and visitor communities
  11. Der Kampf ums Recht
  12. Interferenzbuchstabe
  13. Nitrogen deposition increases susceptibility to drought - experimental evidence with the perennial grass Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench
  14. Theatralisierung des Alltags
  15. Führt Selbstüberschätzung des CEO zu einer sinkenden Rechnungslegungsqualität und zu negativen Marktreaktionen?
  16. Die Tora-Mäntel der Aschkenasen in Glückstadt
  17. Avant la lettre X
  18. Effect of microstructural inhomogeneity on creep response of Mg-Sn alloys
  19. Appreciation of multilingual teaching activities by secondary school students in Germany: findings from a quasi-experimental intervention study on teaching French
  20. Advancing sustainable chemistry education
  21. Lachen können und eine Sache lieben
  22. Social Enterprise Referents
  23. The Problems of Modern Societies — Epistemic Design around 1970
  24. § 47 Allgemeine Überwachung
  25. Sozialarbeiterinnen als Selbstständige
  26. Inter- und transdisziplinäre Forschungsprojekte als Ansatz für eine transformative Hochschulbildung
  27. Making things happen
  28. Stand der Technik und fortschrittliche Ansätze in der Entsorgung des Flowback
  29. General Ecology
  30. Das Unsichtbare sichtbar machen
  31. Quo vadis, Computer ?
  32. Characterization of the deformation state of magnesium by electrical resistance
  33. Effects of the influence factors in adhesive workpiece clamping with ice
  34. Fundamental Theology
  35. Distance-sensitivity of German exports
  36. 'You are angels': understanding the entanglement of family and enterprise in an early-stage family-run coworking space
  37. Sources and pathways of biocides and their transformation products in urban storm water infrastructure of a 2 ha urban district
  38. Response to Kabisch and Colleagues
  39. Identification of phototransformation products of the antiepileptic drug gabapentin
  40. Sich Platz verschaffen
  41. Netzwerkarbeit in der Berufsbildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung
  42. The Relationship Between Theory and Practice in Vocational Education:
  43. Flows of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Originating from Health Care Practices on a Local, Regional, and Nationwide Level in Germany