1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Group evaluations as self-group distanci...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Group evaluations as self-group distancing : Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups. / Essien, Iniobong; Otten, Sabine; Degner, Juliane.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 6, 10.2020, p. 1108-1124.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Essien, I, Otten, S & Degner, J 2020, 'Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups', European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1108-1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2708

APA

Essien, I., Otten, S., & Degner, J. (2020). Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1108-1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2708

Vancouver

Essien I, Otten S, Degner J. Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2020 Oct;50(6):1108-1124. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2708

Bibtex

@article{97e979748a9a444ead1981d3b3c0194d,
title = "Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups",
abstract = "Outgroup favoritism among members of stigmatized groups can be seen as a form of self-group distancing. We examined how intergroup evaluations in stigmatized groups vary as a function of ingroup typicality. In Studies 1 and 2, Black participants (N = 125,915; N = 766) more strongly preferred light-skinned or White relative to dark-skinned or Black individuals the lighter their own skin tone. In Study 3, overweight participants (N = 147,540) more strongly preferred normal-weight relative to overweight individuals the lower their own body weight. In Study 4, participants with disabilities (N = 35,058) more strongly preferred non-disabled relative to disabled individuals the less visible they judged their own disability. Relationships between ingroup typicality and intergroup evaluations were at least partially mediated by ingroup identification (Studies 2 and 3). A meta-analysis across studies yielded an average effect size of r = .12. Furthermore, higher ingroup typicality was related to both ingroup and outgroup evaluations. We discuss ingroup typicality as an individual constraint to self-group distancing among stigmatized group members and its relation to intergroup evaluations.",
keywords = "ingroup favoritism, ingroup typicality, intergroup evaluations, self-group distancing, social identity, stigmatized groups, Psychology",
author = "Iniobong Essien and Sabine Otten and Juliane Degner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2708",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "1108--1124",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group evaluations as self-group distancing

T2 - Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups

AU - Essien, Iniobong

AU - Otten, Sabine

AU - Degner, Juliane

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - Outgroup favoritism among members of stigmatized groups can be seen as a form of self-group distancing. We examined how intergroup evaluations in stigmatized groups vary as a function of ingroup typicality. In Studies 1 and 2, Black participants (N = 125,915; N = 766) more strongly preferred light-skinned or White relative to dark-skinned or Black individuals the lighter their own skin tone. In Study 3, overweight participants (N = 147,540) more strongly preferred normal-weight relative to overweight individuals the lower their own body weight. In Study 4, participants with disabilities (N = 35,058) more strongly preferred non-disabled relative to disabled individuals the less visible they judged their own disability. Relationships between ingroup typicality and intergroup evaluations were at least partially mediated by ingroup identification (Studies 2 and 3). A meta-analysis across studies yielded an average effect size of r = .12. Furthermore, higher ingroup typicality was related to both ingroup and outgroup evaluations. We discuss ingroup typicality as an individual constraint to self-group distancing among stigmatized group members and its relation to intergroup evaluations.

AB - Outgroup favoritism among members of stigmatized groups can be seen as a form of self-group distancing. We examined how intergroup evaluations in stigmatized groups vary as a function of ingroup typicality. In Studies 1 and 2, Black participants (N = 125,915; N = 766) more strongly preferred light-skinned or White relative to dark-skinned or Black individuals the lighter their own skin tone. In Study 3, overweight participants (N = 147,540) more strongly preferred normal-weight relative to overweight individuals the lower their own body weight. In Study 4, participants with disabilities (N = 35,058) more strongly preferred non-disabled relative to disabled individuals the less visible they judged their own disability. Relationships between ingroup typicality and intergroup evaluations were at least partially mediated by ingroup identification (Studies 2 and 3). A meta-analysis across studies yielded an average effect size of r = .12. Furthermore, higher ingroup typicality was related to both ingroup and outgroup evaluations. We discuss ingroup typicality as an individual constraint to self-group distancing among stigmatized group members and its relation to intergroup evaluations.

KW - ingroup favoritism

KW - ingroup typicality

KW - intergroup evaluations

KW - self-group distancing

KW - social identity

KW - stigmatized groups

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090057536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2708

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2708

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 50

SP - 1108

EP - 1124

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 6

ER -

Related by journal

Effects of diversity versus segregation on automatic approach and avoidance behavior towards own and other ethnic groups

Degner, J., Essien, I. & Reichardt, R., 01.10.2016, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 46, 6, p. 783-791 9 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Country-level and individual-level predictors of men's support for gender equality in 42 countries

Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Bosson, J. K., Jurek, P., Vandello, J. A., Best, D. L., Wlodarczyk, A., Safdar, S., Zawisza, M., Żadkowska, M., Sobiecki, J., Agyemang, C. B., Akbaş, G., Ammirati, S., Anderson, J., Anjum, G., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Ashraf, M., Bakaitytė, A., Bi, C., Becker, M., Bender, M., Bërxulli, D., Bosak, J., Daalmans, S., Dandy, J., de Lemus, S., Dvorianchikov, N., Etchezahar, E., Froehlich, L., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Gomez, Á., Greijdanus, H., Grigoryan, A., Hale, M. L., Hämer, H., Hoorens, V., Hutchings, P. B., Jensen, D. H., Kelmendi, K., Khachatryan, N., Kinahan, M., Kozlowski, D., Lauri, M. A., Li, J., Maitner, A. T., Makashvili, A., Mancini, T., Martiny, S. E., Đorđević, J. M., Moreno-Bella, E., Moscatelli, S., Bryan Moynihan, A., Muller, D., Ochoa, D., Adebayo, S. O., Pacilli, M. G., Palacio, J., Patnaik, S., Pavlopoulos, V., Piterová, I., Puzio, A., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Rentería-Pérez, E., Rousseaux, T., Sainz, M., Salvati, M., Samekin, A., García-Sánchez, E., Schindler, S., Sherbaji, S., Sobhie, R., Sulejmanović, D., Sullivan, K. E., Torre, B., Torres, C. V., Ungaretti, J., Valshtein, T., Van Laar, C., van der Noll, J., Vasiutynskyi, V., Vohra, N., Zapata-Calvente, A. L. & Žukauskienė, R., 01.10.2020, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 6, p. 1276-1291 16 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Andrighetto, L., Autin, F., Babincak, P., Badea, C., Bae, J., Batruch, A., Becker, J. C., Bocian, K., Bodroža, B., Bourguignon, D., Bukowski, M., Butera, F., Butler, S. E., Chryssochoou, X., Conway, P., Crawford, J. T., Croizet, J. C., de Lemus, S., Degner, J., Dragon, P., Durante, F., Easterbrook, M. J., Essien, I., Forgas, J. P., González, R., Graf, S., Halama, P., Han, G., Hong, R. Y., Houdek, P., Igou, E. R., Inbar, Y., Jetten, J., Jimenez Leal, W., Jiménez-Moya, G., Karunagharan, J. K., Kende, A., Korzh, M., Laham, S. M., Lammers, J., Lim, L., Manstead, A. S. R., Međedović, J., Melton, Z. J., Motyl, M., Ntani, S., Owuamalam, C. K., Peker, M., Platow, M. J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, C., Rubin, M., Saab, R., Sankaran, S., Shepherd, L., Sibley, C. G., Sobkow, A., Spruyt, B., Stroebaek, P., Sümer, N., Sweetman, J., Teixeira, C. P., Toma, C., Ujhelyi, A., van der Toorn, J., van Hiel, A., Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Vazquez, A., Vianello, M., Vranka, M., Yzerbyt, V. & Zimmerman, J. L., 01.08.2020, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 5, p. 921-942 22 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Antecedents and consequences of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help toward refugees

Becker, J. C., Ksenofontov, I., Siem, B. & Love, A., 06.2019, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 49, 4, p. 831-838 8 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions

Siem, B. & Barth, M., 08.2019, In: European Journal of Social Psychology. 49, 5, p. 1007-1021 15 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

„Weiß und gebildet?“ Auf dem Weg zu einer divers(er)en Klimaschutzbewegung

Siem, B. & Essien, I., 2023, In: In-Mind Magazin. 4

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Transfer › peer-review

Beyond stereotypes: Prejudice as an important missing force explaining group disparities

Essien, I., Stelter, M., Rohmann, A. & Degner, J., 05.2022, In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 45, 3 p., e74.

Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research

Racial bias in police traffic stops: White residents' county-level prejudice and stereotypes are related to disproportionate stopping of Black drivers

Stelter, M., Essien, I., Sander, C. & Degner, J., 01.04.2022, In: Psychological Science. 33, 4, p. 483-496 14 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Shooter biases and stereotypes among police and civilians

Stelter, M., Essien, I., Rohmann, A., Degner, J. & Kemme, S., 01.02.2023, In: Acta Psychologica. 232, 14 p., 103820.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Stereotype in Kindergärten und Kindertagesstätten: Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Evidenz und Interventionsansätze für pädagogisches Fachpersonal

Froehlich, L., Essien, I. & Martiny, S. E., 2022, Stereotype in der Schule II: Ursachen und Möglichkeiten der Intervention. Glock, S. (ed.). Wiesbaden: Springer, p. 137–170 34 p.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

DOI