Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups. / Essien, Iniobong; Otten, Sabine; Degner, Juliane.
in: European Journal of Social Psychology, Jahrgang 50, Nr. 6, 10.2020, S. 1108-1124.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{97e979748a9a444ead1981d3b3c0194d,
title = "Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups",
abstract = "Outgroup favoritism among members of stigmatized groups can be seen as a form of self-group distancing. We examined how intergroup evaluations in stigmatized groups vary as a function of ingroup typicality. In Studies 1 and 2, Black participants (N = 125,915; N = 766) more strongly preferred light-skinned or White relative to dark-skinned or Black individuals the lighter their own skin tone. In Study 3, overweight participants (N = 147,540) more strongly preferred normal-weight relative to overweight individuals the lower their own body weight. In Study 4, participants with disabilities (N = 35,058) more strongly preferred non-disabled relative to disabled individuals the less visible they judged their own disability. Relationships between ingroup typicality and intergroup evaluations were at least partially mediated by ingroup identification (Studies 2 and 3). A meta-analysis across studies yielded an average effect size of r = .12. Furthermore, higher ingroup typicality was related to both ingroup and outgroup evaluations. We discuss ingroup typicality as an individual constraint to self-group distancing among stigmatized group members and its relation to intergroup evaluations.",
keywords = "ingroup favoritism, ingroup typicality, intergroup evaluations, self-group distancing, social identity, stigmatized groups, Psychology",
author = "Iniobong Essien and Sabine Otten and Juliane Degner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2708",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "1108--1124",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group evaluations as self-group distancing

T2 - Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups

AU - Essien, Iniobong

AU - Otten, Sabine

AU - Degner, Juliane

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - Outgroup favoritism among members of stigmatized groups can be seen as a form of self-group distancing. We examined how intergroup evaluations in stigmatized groups vary as a function of ingroup typicality. In Studies 1 and 2, Black participants (N = 125,915; N = 766) more strongly preferred light-skinned or White relative to dark-skinned or Black individuals the lighter their own skin tone. In Study 3, overweight participants (N = 147,540) more strongly preferred normal-weight relative to overweight individuals the lower their own body weight. In Study 4, participants with disabilities (N = 35,058) more strongly preferred non-disabled relative to disabled individuals the less visible they judged their own disability. Relationships between ingroup typicality and intergroup evaluations were at least partially mediated by ingroup identification (Studies 2 and 3). A meta-analysis across studies yielded an average effect size of r = .12. Furthermore, higher ingroup typicality was related to both ingroup and outgroup evaluations. We discuss ingroup typicality as an individual constraint to self-group distancing among stigmatized group members and its relation to intergroup evaluations.

AB - Outgroup favoritism among members of stigmatized groups can be seen as a form of self-group distancing. We examined how intergroup evaluations in stigmatized groups vary as a function of ingroup typicality. In Studies 1 and 2, Black participants (N = 125,915; N = 766) more strongly preferred light-skinned or White relative to dark-skinned or Black individuals the lighter their own skin tone. In Study 3, overweight participants (N = 147,540) more strongly preferred normal-weight relative to overweight individuals the lower their own body weight. In Study 4, participants with disabilities (N = 35,058) more strongly preferred non-disabled relative to disabled individuals the less visible they judged their own disability. Relationships between ingroup typicality and intergroup evaluations were at least partially mediated by ingroup identification (Studies 2 and 3). A meta-analysis across studies yielded an average effect size of r = .12. Furthermore, higher ingroup typicality was related to both ingroup and outgroup evaluations. We discuss ingroup typicality as an individual constraint to self-group distancing among stigmatized group members and its relation to intergroup evaluations.

KW - ingroup favoritism

KW - ingroup typicality

KW - intergroup evaluations

KW - self-group distancing

KW - social identity

KW - stigmatized groups

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090057536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2708

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2708

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 50

SP - 1108

EP - 1124

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 6

ER -

DOI