1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Die Linke v. Federal Government and Fede...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Die Linke v. Federal Government and Federal Parliament (Counter Daesh)

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Standard

Die Linke v. Federal Government and Federal Parliament (Counter Daesh). / Tams, Christian J.
In: American Journal of International Law, Vol. 114, No. 3, 01.07.2020, p. 463-470.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Harvard

Tams, CJ 2020, 'Die Linke v. Federal Government and Federal Parliament (Counter Daesh)', American Journal of International Law, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.35

APA

Tams, C. J. (2020). Die Linke v. Federal Government and Federal Parliament (Counter Daesh). American Journal of International Law, 114(3), 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.35

Vancouver

Tams CJ. Die Linke v. Federal Government and Federal Parliament (Counter Daesh). American Journal of International Law. 2020 Jul 1;114(3):463-470. doi: 10.1017/ajil.2020.35

Bibtex

@article{da1a0c7a5fa541939cf01747c644807b,
title = "Die Linke v. Federal Government and Federal Parliament (Counter Daesh)",
abstract = "By a September 17, 2019 Order (Order), the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC or Court) rejected challenges to Germany's military involvement in anti-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) operations in Syria. This outcome was expected and was as such insignificant. What is significant is the FCC's reasoning. The Court used the Order to clarify the constitutional roles of parliament and the executive in German foreign affairs. And it included an intriguing pronouncement on the scope of Article 51 of the UN Charter, which adds a fresh perspective to the polarized debates about self-defense against nonstate actors. ",
keywords = "Collective security, Deployment of troops, Fight against ISIS/Daesh, German constitutional law, Parliamentary control, Self-defense against nonstate actors, Law",
author = "Tams, {Christian J.}",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/ajil.2020.35",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "463--470",
journal = "American Journal of International Law",
issn = "0002-9300",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Die Linke v. Federal Government and Federal Parliament (Counter Daesh)

AU - Tams, Christian J.

PY - 2020/7/1

Y1 - 2020/7/1

N2 - By a September 17, 2019 Order (Order), the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC or Court) rejected challenges to Germany's military involvement in anti-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) operations in Syria. This outcome was expected and was as such insignificant. What is significant is the FCC's reasoning. The Court used the Order to clarify the constitutional roles of parliament and the executive in German foreign affairs. And it included an intriguing pronouncement on the scope of Article 51 of the UN Charter, which adds a fresh perspective to the polarized debates about self-defense against nonstate actors.

AB - By a September 17, 2019 Order (Order), the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC or Court) rejected challenges to Germany's military involvement in anti-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) operations in Syria. This outcome was expected and was as such insignificant. What is significant is the FCC's reasoning. The Court used the Order to clarify the constitutional roles of parliament and the executive in German foreign affairs. And it included an intriguing pronouncement on the scope of Article 51 of the UN Charter, which adds a fresh perspective to the polarized debates about self-defense against nonstate actors.

KW - Collective security

KW - Deployment of troops

KW - Fight against ISIS/Daesh

KW - German constitutional law

KW - Parliamentary control

KW - Self-defense against nonstate actors

KW - Law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094174748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3a05f4b6-4eed-3a77-b779-769cf01583b6/

U2 - 10.1017/ajil.2020.35

DO - 10.1017/ajil.2020.35

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85094174748

VL - 114

SP - 463

EP - 470

JO - American Journal of International Law

JF - American Journal of International Law

SN - 0002-9300

IS - 3

ER -

Other publications by the same author(s)

§ 4 The international legal framework governing the TCA

Tams, C. J., 2024, EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: A Handbook. Kübek, G., Tams, C. J. & Terhechte, J. P. (eds.). 1. ed. Oxford: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, p. 42-54 13 p.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter

EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: A Handbook

Kübek, G. (ed.), Tams, C. J. (ed.) & Terhechte, J. (ed.), 2024, 1. ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. 550 p.

Research output: Books and anthologies › Collected editions and anthologies › Research

Editorial

Bäumler, J., Bungenberg, M., Krajewski, M., Rühl, G., Tams, C. J., Terhechte, J. P., Ziegler, A. R. & Binder, C., 2022, In: European Yearbook of International Economic Law. 12, p. v-ix 5 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Other (editorial matter etc.) › Research

Editorial

Bäumler, J., Binder, C., Bungenberg, M., Krajewski, M., Rühl, G., Tams, C. J., Terhechte, J. & Ziegler, A. R., 2022, European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2021 . Bäumler, J., Bungenberg, M., Rühl, G., Binder, C., Krajewski, M., Tams, C. J., Terhechte, J. P. & Ziegler, A. R. (eds.). Springer, p. v-ix 4 p. (European Yearbook of International Economic Law (EUROYEAR); vol. 12).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Other › Research

Encoding the law of State responsibility with courage and resolve: James Crawford and the 2001 Articles on State Responsibility

Paddeu, F. I. & Tams, C. J., 01.06.2022, In: Cambridge International Law Journal. 11, 1, p. 6-23 18 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

DOI