Conflict strength: Measuring the tension between cooperative and competitive incentives in experimental negotiation tasks

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Conflict strength: Measuring the tension between cooperative and competitive incentives in experimental negotiation tasks. / Majer, Johann; Schweinsberg, Martin; Zhang, Hong et al.
In: Collabra: Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 35330, 06.05.2022.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{58e92141f0de4e708fd4a21e4523e2d1,
title = "Conflict strength:: Measuring the tension between cooperative and competitive incentives in experimental negotiation tasks",
abstract = "Conflict management scholars study mixed-motive negotiation situations with cooperative and competitive incentives predominantly through multi-issue negotiation tasks in experimental studies. Intriguingly, experimenters currently lack an objective, generalizable, and continuous measure that precisely quantifies the incentives underlying these negotiation tasks. We present the conflict strength coefficient, which enables scholars to systematically quantify the incentive structures in these multi-issue negotiation tasks. By making the incentive structures accessible and numerically comparable, the conflict strength coefficient provides new insights into the central element of the experimental study of negotiation and conflict management, unmasks differences across existing tasks, facilitates research transparency, knowledge sharing, and open science practices. We demonstrate the coefficient{\textquoteright}s benefits by providing a hands-on example from past research, by reviewing and quantitatively assessing the current literature, and by mapping conflict strength coefficients for the negotiation and conflict management research landscape and its subareas. Our analysis suggests that the conflict strength coefficient can enrich the understanding of cooperative and competitive incentives in the established tasks and directly guide and support an individual scholar{\textquoteright}s process of knowledge creation. The conflict strength coefficient provides a methodological contribution to the experimental study of conflict management and negotiation with immediate benefits for the production of scientific knowledge, the experimental study of real-world phenomena, and theory development.",
keywords = "Psychology, methods, measures, research transparency, open science, Reproducibility, meta-science, negotiation, conflict, cooperation, competition",
author = "Johann Majer and Martin Schweinsberg and Hong Zhang and Roman Tr{\"o}tschel",
note = "Funding Information: The present research is supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG: MA 8577/1-1) with a grant awarded to the first author JM. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1525/collabra.35330",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Collabra: Psychology",
issn = "2474-7394",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict strength:

T2 - Measuring the tension between cooperative and competitive incentives in experimental negotiation tasks

AU - Majer, Johann

AU - Schweinsberg, Martin

AU - Zhang, Hong

AU - Trötschel, Roman

N1 - Funding Information: The present research is supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG: MA 8577/1-1) with a grant awarded to the first author JM. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/5/6

Y1 - 2022/5/6

N2 - Conflict management scholars study mixed-motive negotiation situations with cooperative and competitive incentives predominantly through multi-issue negotiation tasks in experimental studies. Intriguingly, experimenters currently lack an objective, generalizable, and continuous measure that precisely quantifies the incentives underlying these negotiation tasks. We present the conflict strength coefficient, which enables scholars to systematically quantify the incentive structures in these multi-issue negotiation tasks. By making the incentive structures accessible and numerically comparable, the conflict strength coefficient provides new insights into the central element of the experimental study of negotiation and conflict management, unmasks differences across existing tasks, facilitates research transparency, knowledge sharing, and open science practices. We demonstrate the coefficient’s benefits by providing a hands-on example from past research, by reviewing and quantitatively assessing the current literature, and by mapping conflict strength coefficients for the negotiation and conflict management research landscape and its subareas. Our analysis suggests that the conflict strength coefficient can enrich the understanding of cooperative and competitive incentives in the established tasks and directly guide and support an individual scholar’s process of knowledge creation. The conflict strength coefficient provides a methodological contribution to the experimental study of conflict management and negotiation with immediate benefits for the production of scientific knowledge, the experimental study of real-world phenomena, and theory development.

AB - Conflict management scholars study mixed-motive negotiation situations with cooperative and competitive incentives predominantly through multi-issue negotiation tasks in experimental studies. Intriguingly, experimenters currently lack an objective, generalizable, and continuous measure that precisely quantifies the incentives underlying these negotiation tasks. We present the conflict strength coefficient, which enables scholars to systematically quantify the incentive structures in these multi-issue negotiation tasks. By making the incentive structures accessible and numerically comparable, the conflict strength coefficient provides new insights into the central element of the experimental study of negotiation and conflict management, unmasks differences across existing tasks, facilitates research transparency, knowledge sharing, and open science practices. We demonstrate the coefficient’s benefits by providing a hands-on example from past research, by reviewing and quantitatively assessing the current literature, and by mapping conflict strength coefficients for the negotiation and conflict management research landscape and its subareas. Our analysis suggests that the conflict strength coefficient can enrich the understanding of cooperative and competitive incentives in the established tasks and directly guide and support an individual scholar’s process of knowledge creation. The conflict strength coefficient provides a methodological contribution to the experimental study of conflict management and negotiation with immediate benefits for the production of scientific knowledge, the experimental study of real-world phenomena, and theory development.

KW - Psychology

KW - methods

KW - measures

KW - research transparency

KW - open science

KW - Reproducibility

KW - meta-science

KW - negotiation

KW - conflict

KW - cooperation

KW - competition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130493762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/collabra.35330

DO - 10.1525/collabra.35330

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 8

JO - Collabra: Psychology

JF - Collabra: Psychology

SN - 2474-7394

IS - 1

M1 - 35330

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Feldstudie zur Entwicklung der Rechenfertigkeit von Erstklässlern.
  2. Global, lokal, digital
  3. Moralphilosophische Fragen zum "Embryo"
  4. Was tun?
  5. Finance is Society!
  6. Part 14 Control of political donations and expenditure
  7. Corporate Governance Reporting zum Prüfungsausschuss
  8. Wunsch und Technik
  9. Critical Reflections on "Democracy in Crisis'
  10. Moirés, Andreas Fogarasi, Katya Sander, Urtica
  11. Global, lokal, digital
  12. Merkmale des SEMIK-Schwerpunkts "Entwicklung von Unterrichtskonzepten"
  13. Immediation
  14. Developing Carbon Accounting
  15. Halbmedienkompetenz?“
  16. Vergleichsarbeiten als Instrument der datenbasierten Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung in Gymnasien
  17. Robot system for the sustainable mobility assurance in the assistance and care
  18. Zwischen Animismus und Animation – Krieg und (Virtual) Reality bei Harun Farocki
  19. Bewegte Sprache – Ein Leben mit und für Mehrsprachigkeit
  20. Was will der Wagner?
  21. Ebstorfer Weltkarte
  22. Dance Librarian
  23. Gender-Rituale in der Mobilkommunikation von Jugendlichen
  24. Matheprofis im Gespräch - Kleingruppenarbeit im Mathematikunterricht
  25. Das Böse heute
  26. Interoperability of mineral sustainability initiatives
  27. Silence / Signification Degree Zero: Walter Benjamin’s Anti-Aesthetic of the Body
  28. Bildersuche
  29. Appointing to Govern: Party Patronage in Europe
  30. Mediation
  31. Schooling, Identity, and Nationhood: Karen Mother-Tongue-Based Education in the Thai–Burmese Border Region
  32. Menschen und Singvögel
  33. Kollaborationsmöglichkeiten richtig bewerten
  34. Das Management von Stakeholderbeziehungen in der Start-Up Phase: Institutionenökonomische Implikationen
  35. Implementierung einer Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung in den Kindergarten aus organisationaler Perspektive
  36. Review: Maris Köpcke, A Short History of Legal Validity and Invalidity – Foundations of Private and Public Law, Cambridge 2019, Zeitschrift
  37. Prüfung von Nachhaltigkeitsberichten nach der Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)