Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Communicating uncertainties in scientific evidence is important to accurately reflect scientific knowledge, increase public understanding of uncertainty, and to signal transparency and honesty in reporting. While techniques have been developed to facilitate the communication of uncertainty, many have not been empirically tested, compared for communicating different types of uncertainty, or their effects on different cognitive, trust, and behavioral outcomes have not been evaluated. The present study examined how a point estimate, imprecise estimate, conflicting estimates, or a statement about the lack of evidence about treatment effects, influenced participant's responses to communications about medical evidence. For each type of uncertainty, we adapted three display formats to communicate the information: tables, bar graphs, and icon arrays. We compared participant's best estimates of treatment effects, as well as effects on recall, subjective evaluations (understandability and usefuleness), certainty perceptions, perceptions of trustworthiness of the information, and behavioral intentions. We did not find any detrimental effects from communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to a point estimate across any outcome. Furthermore, there were more favorable responses to communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to lack of evidence, where participants estimated the treatment would improve outcomes by 30–50% relative to a placebo. There were no differences across display formats, suggesting that, if well-designed, it may not matter which format is used. Future research on specific display formats or uncertainty types and with larger sample sizes would be needed to detect small effects. Implications for the communication of uncertainty are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume41
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)2220-2239
Number of pages20
ISSN0272-4332
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.12.2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. 11th Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering - CIRP ICME 2017
  2. Supporting Enlightened Public Thought - 2020
  3. Enlightened Mythology.: Thomas Mann and Myth
  4. The Arctic as a messenger for global processes – climate change and pollution 2011
  5. An Integrated Approach of Vehicle-Crew-Scheduling-and-Rostering in Public Bus Transit
  6. International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications 2018
  7. 28th American Conference on Information Systems 2022 - AMCIS 2022
  8. Co-creation in Open Strategy and Entrepreneurship
  9. World Resources Forum - WRF 2011
  10. The Upcycling Effect
  11. Tagung "Umgang mit Heterogenität" - 2013
  12. The use of digital communication media in cross-border knowledge transfer processes: A competitive advantage for multinational companies?
  13. Potential for line-mussel production in the Great Belt (Denmark)
  14. Socio-technical Instruments for Integrated River Basin Management
  15. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting (Zeitschrift)
  16. The botherder's lure and the figure of the pirate: trespassing enclosures and tweaking affordances
  17. Identification and Determination of Selected Pharmaceuticals and Their Dead End Degradation Products in Degradation Testing
  18. Mapping the Field of Contemporary Art
  19. Applied Linguistics (Fachzeitschrift)
  20. ‘Please, Just Make Service Faster’: When Human-likeness in Chatbots Backfires
  21. 1st Organizing Creativity – Transalpine Paper Development Workshop
  22. Impulse Talk: Overview of the development of the sharing economy from different perspectives
  23. HR Division of the Academy of Management