Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Ortwin Renn
  • Manfred Laubichler
  • Klaus Lucas
  • Wolfgang Kröger
  • Jochen Schanze
  • Roland W. Scholz
  • Pia‐johanna Schweizer
Systemic risks are characterized by high complexity, multiple uncertainties, major ambiguities, and transgressive effects on other systems outside of the system of origin. Due to these characteristics, systemic risks are overextending established risk management and create new, unsolved challenges for policymaking in risk assessment and risk governance. Their negative effects are often pervasive, impacting fields beyond the obvious primary areas of harm. This article addresses these challenges of systemic risks from different disciplinary and sectorial perspectives. It highlights the special contributions of these perspectives and approaches and provides a synthesis for an interdisciplinary understanding of systemic risks and effective governance. The main argument is that understanding systemic risks and providing good governance advice relies on an approach that integrates novel modeling tools from complexity sciences with empirical data from observations, experiments, or simulations and evidence-based insights about social and cultural response patterns revealed by quantitative (e.g., surveys) or qualitative (e.g., participatory appraisals) investigations. Systemic risks cannot be easily characterized by single numerical estimations but can be assessed by using multiple indicators and including several dynamic gradients that can be aggregated into diverse but coherent scenarios. Lastly, governance of systemic risks requires interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral cooperation, a close monitoring system, and the engagement of scientists, regulators, and stakeholders to be effective as well as socially acceptable.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume42
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1902-1920
Number of pages19
ISSN0272-4332
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.09.2022

Bibliographical note

The authors would like to acknowledge the support by the Berlin‐Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Germany. The publication is the outcome of the Academy's interdisciplinary initiative “Systemic Risks as Prototypes of Dynamic Structure Generation” chaired by Klaus Lucas and Ortwin Renn. The initiative conducted several workshops from 2017 to 2019. We are thankful to the workshop participants and the anonymous reviewers of who have provided valuable feedback on earlier versions of the publication. In addition, the authors are grateful for the support of the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies in Potsdam, Germany. Risk Analysis

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The global distribution of authorship in economics journals
  2. Plastics in our ocean as transdisciplinary challenge
  3. Characterization of selected microalgae and cyanobacteria as sources of compounds with antioxidant capacity
  4. Case study analysis of laser-assisted Low-Cost Automation assembly
  5. Materialitäten der Kindheit
  6. Non-sterile fermentation of food waste with indigenous consortium and yeast – Effects on microbial community and product spectrum
  7. Portraying myth more convincingly
  8. Nestedness in fragmented landscapes: a case study on birds, arboreal marsupials and lizards
  9. Mechanisms behind elevational plant species richness patterns revealed by a trait-based approach
  10. Joseph Heller
  11. When do customers engage with a company?
  12. Sustainable Development as a Challenge for Undergraduate Students: The Module "Science Bears Responsibility" in the Leuphana Bachelor's Programme
  13. Reconsidering adaptation as translation
  14. Robert Walser lieben
  15. The European Commission’s Expert Groups
  16. The politics of expertise and ignorance in the field of migration management
  17. The effectiveness of interventions during and after residence in women’s shelters
  18. Three-dimensional microstructural analysis of Mg-Al-Zn alloys by synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography
  19. Fluidity, Identity, and Organizationality
  20. The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task-environment-performance relationship
  21. Innovative approaches in mathematical modeling
  22. Ideological Stances in Yoruba Nation Secessionist Discourse in Nigerian Virtual Communities
  23. Building a bridge between school and university
  24. QUANT - Question Answering Benchmark Curator
  25. Students' Time Allocation and School Performance
  26. Sustainable engineering education in research and practice
  27. How health message framing and targets affect distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic
  28. A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management
  29. Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
  30. Impacts of entrepreneur’s error orientation on performance: A cross-culture comparison
  31. Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more
  32. Synchronic and Diachronic Pragmatic Variability
  33. The self-sabotage of conservation
  34. Globalization and the societal consensus of wealth tax cuts
  35. Discrimination at work: Effects on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. An empirical study of the influence of perceived discrimination on work-related behaviours among people with and without a migration background
  36. Influence of Torsion on Precipitation and Hardening Effects during Aging of an Extruded AZ91 Alloy
  37. Vermittlungstheologie II. Dogmatisch
  38. Spielt Charlie Parker in den Wind oder mit ihm?
  39. From the environmental state to the sustainability state? Conceptualization, indicators, and examples