Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats. / McDowell, Michelle; Kause, Astrid.
In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 41, No. 12, 01.12.2021, p. 2220-2239.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

McDowell M, Kause A. Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats. Risk Analysis. 2021 Dec 1;41(12):2220-2239. Epub 2021 Jun 9. doi: 10.1111/risa.13739

Bibtex

@article{e1c6b983e5954843b0e1edfac8c148bd,
title = "Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats",
abstract = "Communicating uncertainties in scientific evidence is important to accurately reflect scientific knowledge, increase public understanding of uncertainty, and to signal transparency and honesty in reporting. While techniques have been developed to facilitate the communication of uncertainty, many have not been empirically tested, compared for communicating different types of uncertainty, or their effects on different cognitive, trust, and behavioral outcomes have not been evaluated. The present study examined how a point estimate, imprecise estimate, conflicting estimates, or a statement about the lack of evidence about treatment effects, influenced participant's responses to communications about medical evidence. For each type of uncertainty, we adapted three display formats to communicate the information: tables, bar graphs, and icon arrays. We compared participant's best estimates of treatment effects, as well as effects on recall, subjective evaluations (understandability and usefuleness), certainty perceptions, perceptions of trustworthiness of the information, and behavioral intentions. We did not find any detrimental effects from communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to a point estimate across any outcome. Furthermore, there were more favorable responses to communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to lack of evidence, where participants estimated the treatment would improve outcomes by 30–50% relative to a placebo. There were no differences across display formats, suggesting that, if well-designed, it may not matter which format is used. Future research on specific display formats or uncertainty types and with larger sample sizes would be needed to detect small effects. Implications for the communication of uncertainty are discussed.",
keywords = "Risk communication, uncertainty, visual displays, Psychology, Sustainability sciences, Communication",
author = "Michelle McDowell and Astrid Kause",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/risa.13739",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "2220--2239",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats

AU - McDowell, Michelle

AU - Kause, Astrid

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis

PY - 2021/12/1

Y1 - 2021/12/1

N2 - Communicating uncertainties in scientific evidence is important to accurately reflect scientific knowledge, increase public understanding of uncertainty, and to signal transparency and honesty in reporting. While techniques have been developed to facilitate the communication of uncertainty, many have not been empirically tested, compared for communicating different types of uncertainty, or their effects on different cognitive, trust, and behavioral outcomes have not been evaluated. The present study examined how a point estimate, imprecise estimate, conflicting estimates, or a statement about the lack of evidence about treatment effects, influenced participant's responses to communications about medical evidence. For each type of uncertainty, we adapted three display formats to communicate the information: tables, bar graphs, and icon arrays. We compared participant's best estimates of treatment effects, as well as effects on recall, subjective evaluations (understandability and usefuleness), certainty perceptions, perceptions of trustworthiness of the information, and behavioral intentions. We did not find any detrimental effects from communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to a point estimate across any outcome. Furthermore, there were more favorable responses to communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to lack of evidence, where participants estimated the treatment would improve outcomes by 30–50% relative to a placebo. There were no differences across display formats, suggesting that, if well-designed, it may not matter which format is used. Future research on specific display formats or uncertainty types and with larger sample sizes would be needed to detect small effects. Implications for the communication of uncertainty are discussed.

AB - Communicating uncertainties in scientific evidence is important to accurately reflect scientific knowledge, increase public understanding of uncertainty, and to signal transparency and honesty in reporting. While techniques have been developed to facilitate the communication of uncertainty, many have not been empirically tested, compared for communicating different types of uncertainty, or their effects on different cognitive, trust, and behavioral outcomes have not been evaluated. The present study examined how a point estimate, imprecise estimate, conflicting estimates, or a statement about the lack of evidence about treatment effects, influenced participant's responses to communications about medical evidence. For each type of uncertainty, we adapted three display formats to communicate the information: tables, bar graphs, and icon arrays. We compared participant's best estimates of treatment effects, as well as effects on recall, subjective evaluations (understandability and usefuleness), certainty perceptions, perceptions of trustworthiness of the information, and behavioral intentions. We did not find any detrimental effects from communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to a point estimate across any outcome. Furthermore, there were more favorable responses to communicating imprecision or conflicting estimates relative to lack of evidence, where participants estimated the treatment would improve outcomes by 30–50% relative to a placebo. There were no differences across display formats, suggesting that, if well-designed, it may not matter which format is used. Future research on specific display formats or uncertainty types and with larger sample sizes would be needed to detect small effects. Implications for the communication of uncertainty are discussed.

KW - Risk communication

KW - uncertainty

KW - visual displays

KW - Psychology

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107593725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/b9decc61-786a-3382-af48-ca13610d5192/

U2 - 10.1111/risa.13739

DO - 10.1111/risa.13739

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34109678

AN - SCOPUS:85107593725

VL - 41

SP - 2220

EP - 2239

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 12

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Navigating pluralism
  2. Embedded, not plugged-in
  3. Transcending the Locality of Grassroots Initiatives
  4. Data quality assessment framework for critical raw materials. The case of cobalt
  5. Qualitative and Quantitative Human Error Analysis in Hazardous Industries
  6. Mathematical Model of Double Row Self-Aligning Ball Bearing
  7. Assembly history modulates vertical root distribution in a grassland experiment
  8. How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research
  9. Concept Maps in der Hochschullehre
  10. Introduction to Kant's Anthropology
  11. Substance Flows Associated with Medical Care - Significance of Different Sources
  12. (Un)Bestimmtheit
  13. Impact of Auditor and Audit Firm Rotation on Accounting and Audit Quality
  14. Fallstudie
  15. An experimental approach to the optimisation of customer information at the point of sale
  16. Lifestyle-TV – Critical Attitudes towards „Banal” Programming
  17. Fallstudie
  18. Methodology for Integrating Biomimetic Beams in Abstracted Topology Optimization Results
  19. Effect of laser peening process parameters and sequences on residual stress profiles
  20. The science-policy interface on ecosystems and people
  21. Influence of Long-Lasting Static Stretching on Maximal Strength, Muscle Thickness and Flexibility
  22. Industrial Application Study and Development of a Control Strategy for an Ice Clamping Device
  23. Biodiversity buffers pollination from changes in environmental conditions
  24. EURODEMO - Improving the uptake of efficient soil and groundwater remediation technologies
  25. Das Schreiben, das Interpretieren, die Tatsachen
  26. Brain Drain
  27. L'agenda 21 locale
  28. International Master’s Programme in Sustainable Development and Management
  29. Critical evaluation of commonly used methods to determine the concordance between sonography and magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study
  30. Embedded Self-Managing Modes of Organizing
  31. Love in Paramyth
  32. Firm size and the use of export intermediaries.
  33. A sensitive microsystem as biosensor for cell growth monitoring and antibiotic testing
  34. Frank Fischer/Herbert Gottweis (Hg.) The Argumentative Turn Revisited.
  35. Schreiben Englisch
  36. Tourismuswissenschaft
  37. Groundwater abstraction for irrigation and its impacts on low flows in a watershed in Northwest Germany
  38. How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research?
  39. Mimikbasierte Emotionserfassung anhand von dynamischen Flächen und Streckenveränderung
  40. The new US horizontal merger guidelines
  41. The global perspective of education for sustainable development
  42. Mildes Luthertum?
  43. Translating European labor relations practices to the United States through global framework agreements?
  44. The impact of growth markets in the downstream sector - the parameters for connectivity and services: Beyond outer space law
  45. Autonomie der Migration