A Proposal for Integrating Theories of Complexity for Better Understanding Global Systemic Risks

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Armin Haas
  • Manfred Laubichler
  • Joffa Applegate
  • Gesine Steudle
  • Carlo C. Jaeger
The global financial crisis of 2008 has shown that the present financial system involves global systemic risks. The dimension of these risks is hard to grasp with the conceptual tools that have been developed to tackle conventional risks like fire or car accidents. While modern societies know quite well how to deal with conventional risks, we have not yet been equally successful at dealing with global systemic risks. For managing this kind of risks, one needs to understand critical features of specific global systems where many human agents interact in ever changing complex networks. Here we apply two specific dimensions of complexity theory for dealing with global systemic risk in an integrated fashion: normal accidents and extended evolution. Both of them have successfully been applied to the analysis of systemic risks. As a paradigmatic example of global systemic risks, we focus on the global financial crisis that began in 2008, and suggest that the future evolution of the financial system could either see a further increase in complexity, or a reversal to a less complex system. We explore and contrast the implications of normal accident theory and extended evolution perspectives and suggest a four-point research strategy informed by complexity theory for better understanding global systemic risks in financial systems.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume42
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1945-1951
Number of pages7
ISSN0272-4332
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.09.2022

Bibliographical note

The authors would like to acknowledge crucial support by the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. The present publication is an outcome of the Academy's initiative “Systemic Risks as Prototypes of Dynamic Structure Generation,” launched by Klaus Lukas and Ortwin Renn, and skillfully administered by Ute Tintemann. This initiative conducted four workshops in the years 2017–2019; we thank the workshop participants for inspiring and fruitful comments and discussions. We also want to thank Ortwin Renn and Pia Schweizer for their steady support as editors of this special issue. Moreover, we want to thank Perry Mehrling, Steffen Murau, Joe Rini, Eckehard Häberle, Shade Shutters, and the members of the systemic risk research group of IASS for their intellectual inspiration, support, and enlightening discussions. We want to thank two anonymous reviewers and express our professional gratitude for their careful reviews. Together, these reviews helped us to streamline our article and sharpen its focus and its line of argument. The responsibility for errors stays, of course, with the authors.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis.

    Research areas

  • Transdisciplinary studies - extended evolution, Global financial crisis, global systemic risks, key currency, normal accidents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The role of reading time complexity and reading speed in text comprehension
  2. A denoising procedure using wavelet packets for instantaneous detection of pantograph oscillations
  3. Design and Control of an Inductive Power Transmission System with AC-AC Converter for a Constant Output Current
  4. Introducing parametric uncertainty into a nonlinear friction model
  5. Understanding storytelling in the context of information systems
  6. Design of controllers applied to autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles using software in the loop
  7. The identification of up-And downstream industries using input-output tables and a firm-level application to minority shareholdings
  8. Relationships between language-related variations in text tasks, reading comprehension, and students’ motivation and emotions: A systematic review
  9. Gaining deep leverage? Reflecting and shaping real-world lab impacts through leverage points
  10. What motivates people to use energy feedback systems? A multiple goal approach to predict long-term usage behaviour in daily life
  11. Methods in Writing Process Research
  12. Introduction
  13. Internet research differs from research on internet users
  14. Accuracy Improvement of Vision System for Mobile Robot Navigation by Finding the Energetic Center of Laser Signal
  15. Performance predictors for graphics processing units applied to dark-silicon-aware design space exploration
  16. Negotiation complexity
  17. Using Long-Duration Static Stretch Training to Counteract Strength and Flexibility Deficits in Moderately Trained Participants
  18. The Effect of Implicit Moral Attitudes on Managerial Decision-Making
  19. Twitter and its usage for dialogic stakeholder communication by MNCs and NGOs
  20. Introduction to Automatic Imitation
  21. Using EEG movement tagging to isolate brain responses coupled to biological movements
  22. Effects Of Different Order Processing Strategies On Operating Curves Of Logistic Models
  23. Towards Computer Simulations of Virtue Ethics
  24. The implications of knowledge hiding at work for recovery after work: A diary study
  25. Analysis of the construction of an autonomous robot to improve its energy efficiency when traveling through irregular terrain