Ambidextrous Leadership and Team Innovation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ambidextrous Leadership and Team Innovation. / Zacher, Hannes; Rosing, Kathrin.
In: Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, 02.03.2015, p. 54-68.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Zacher H, Rosing K. Ambidextrous Leadership and Team Innovation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 2015 Mar 2;36(1):54-68. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141

Bibtex

@article{a4be5106082a42a7a371934f8852e549,
title = "Ambidextrous Leadership and Team Innovation",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the first empirical test of the recently proposed ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation (Rosing et al., 2011). This theory proposes that the interaction between two complementary leadership behaviors – opening and closing – predicts team innovation, such that team innovation is highest when both opening and closing leadership behaviors are high. Design/methodology/approach – Multi-source survey data came from 33 team leaders of architectural and interior design firms and 90 of their employees. Findings – Results supported the interaction hypothesis, even after controlling for leaders{\textquoteright} transformational leadership behavior and general team success. Research limitations/implications – The relatively small sample size and the cross-sectional design are potential limitations of the study. The findings provide initial support for the central hypothesis of the ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation. Practical implications – The results suggest that organizations could train team leaders{\textquoteright} ambidextrous leadership behaviors to increase team innovation. Social implications – Identifying ways to facilitate organizational innovation is important, as it contributes to employment and company growth as well as individual and societal well-being. Originality/value – This multi-source study contributes to the literatures on leadership and innovation in organizations by showing that ambidextrous leadership behaviors predict team innovation above and beyond transformational leadership behavior.",
keywords = "Business psychology, Ambidextrous leadership, Closing, Creativity, Innovation, Opening, Transformational leadership",
author = "Hannes Zacher and Kathrin Rosing",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "54--68",
journal = "Leadership and Organization Development Journal",
issn = "0143-7739",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambidextrous Leadership and Team Innovation

AU - Zacher, Hannes

AU - Rosing, Kathrin

PY - 2015/3/2

Y1 - 2015/3/2

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the first empirical test of the recently proposed ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation (Rosing et al., 2011). This theory proposes that the interaction between two complementary leadership behaviors – opening and closing – predicts team innovation, such that team innovation is highest when both opening and closing leadership behaviors are high. Design/methodology/approach – Multi-source survey data came from 33 team leaders of architectural and interior design firms and 90 of their employees. Findings – Results supported the interaction hypothesis, even after controlling for leaders’ transformational leadership behavior and general team success. Research limitations/implications – The relatively small sample size and the cross-sectional design are potential limitations of the study. The findings provide initial support for the central hypothesis of the ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation. Practical implications – The results suggest that organizations could train team leaders’ ambidextrous leadership behaviors to increase team innovation. Social implications – Identifying ways to facilitate organizational innovation is important, as it contributes to employment and company growth as well as individual and societal well-being. Originality/value – This multi-source study contributes to the literatures on leadership and innovation in organizations by showing that ambidextrous leadership behaviors predict team innovation above and beyond transformational leadership behavior.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the first empirical test of the recently proposed ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation (Rosing et al., 2011). This theory proposes that the interaction between two complementary leadership behaviors – opening and closing – predicts team innovation, such that team innovation is highest when both opening and closing leadership behaviors are high. Design/methodology/approach – Multi-source survey data came from 33 team leaders of architectural and interior design firms and 90 of their employees. Findings – Results supported the interaction hypothesis, even after controlling for leaders’ transformational leadership behavior and general team success. Research limitations/implications – The relatively small sample size and the cross-sectional design are potential limitations of the study. The findings provide initial support for the central hypothesis of the ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation. Practical implications – The results suggest that organizations could train team leaders’ ambidextrous leadership behaviors to increase team innovation. Social implications – Identifying ways to facilitate organizational innovation is important, as it contributes to employment and company growth as well as individual and societal well-being. Originality/value – This multi-source study contributes to the literatures on leadership and innovation in organizations by showing that ambidextrous leadership behaviors predict team innovation above and beyond transformational leadership behavior.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Ambidextrous leadership

KW - Closing

KW - Creativity

KW - Innovation

KW - Opening

KW - Transformational leadership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923325719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141

DO - 10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 36

SP - 54

EP - 68

JO - Leadership and Organization Development Journal

JF - Leadership and Organization Development Journal

SN - 0143-7739

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. W-RENA
  2. The Anthem Companion to Ernst Troeltsch
  3. Personalmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben
  4. Migration und Integration im Bürgerbewusstsein von Schülerinnen und Schülern
  5. Vorwort
  6. Unterschiede im physischen Selbstkonzept bei normalgewichtigen und adipösen Personen
  7. Artikel 221 AEUV [Vertretung der Union in Drittländern]
  8. Werkkommentare
  9. Zwei Welten
  10. Was heißt Medienästhetik?
  11. KOPRA- Kompetenzentwicklung im Praxisjahr
  12. A note on the granular nature of imports in German manufacturing industries
  13. Werden
  14. SPS steuern Assistenzsysteme in der Digitalen Fabrik
  15. Consequences of Classroom Assessment
  16. Optimal investment in multi-species protection
  17. Cities are hotspots for threatened species
  18. Sustainability Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
  19. Sozial induzierter Opportunismus
  20. Resistenza animale: un'introduzione
  21. Environmental and operational sustainability of airports
  22. The communism of capital?
  23. Metamorphosen des Alltags
  24. Book Review: Organizations: A Systems Approach, S. Kühl. Farnham: Gower Publishing, 2013. 195 pp. ISBN 9781472413413.
  25. Women on management board and ESG performance
  26. Raumkonsum als Produktion von Orten
  27. Radical beauty
  28. Bundesländer
  29. Kreativität? Über das Schöpferische in Natur und Kunst
  30. Chosen time headways by angry younger and older drivers
  31. DGFF (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fremdsprachenforschung)
  32. Anselm Strauss: Gefühlsarbeit
  33. RE/viewing Jerusalem
  34. Informationsmanagement in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen
  35. Medienethnographie
  36. Emotionskompetenz als Kernkompetenz für (Sozial-)Pädagogen und für ihre Schüler