Mixed farmers' perception of the ecological-economic performance of diversified farming

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Julia Rosa-Schleich
  • Jacqueline Loos
  • Marco Ferrante
  • Oliver Mußhoff
  • Teja Tscharntke

Diversified Farming (DF) practices are strategies to support biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Despite the potential ecological benefits of DF practices, their acceptance among farmers remains limited. Therefore, understanding farmer's perceptions is essential for effective policy decision-making and applicable agri-environmental policies. We conducted structured face-to-face interviews with 145 farmers in Lower Saxony to estimate the ecological-economic performance of DF practices based on farmers' perceived changes in yield, variable costs, and gross margin of cereal production. Farmers expected diversified crop rotation to increase gross margin (20%), while reduced tillage, direct seeding and flower strips would decrease it (58%, 61% and 13%). Cover crops were expected to provide ecological benefits with only slightly reduced profit (1%). Farm soil fertility was positively related to the perceived gross margin, while farmers' risk attitude and the number of DF practices applied showed no significant influence. Farmers working on mixed farms, i.e., integrating livestock and crops, expected lower variable costs than farmers working on arable farms. Our findings highlight that DF practices can be valued differently, with the greatest benefits seen in improved crop rotation. The acceptance of DF practices that farmers perceive as negative, such as reduced tillage and direct seeding, would require adapted agri-environmental incentives.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108174
JournalEcological Economics
Volume220
Number of pages11
ISSN0921-8009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.06.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023

    Research areas

  • Agroecology, Conservation agriculture, Diversified farming practices, Gross margin, Profitability, Sustainable agriculture
  • Ecosystems Research
  • Biology

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Peter Bringewat

Publications

  1. Religionen im Pluralismus
  2. Weder Herren noch Knechte
  3. Überschriften – der Anfang ist das A und O?!
  4. A systematic multi-step screening of numerous salt hydrates for low temperature thermochemical energy storage
  5. Metabolites and Transformation Products of Pharmaceuticals in the Aquatic Environment as Contaminants of Emerging Concern
  6. Stichtagsprinzip und Ereignisse nach dem Bilanzstichtag
  7. Bankruptcy in Germany
  8. Projekt "Gender Greenstreaming"
  9. Stromzugang im Globalen Süden
  10. IMAGE: Development of a European curriculum for the training of prevention managers
  11. Confliggere cooperando
  12. Ist auch Krankheit "der Sünde Sold"?
  13. Arbeitszufriedenheit im Kontext
  14. Fragwürdige Gründe: Exklusion durch Inklusion?
  15. Bewegung - Bildung - Gesundheit
  16. Transdisciplinarity
  17. Mental health – backbone of the soul
  18. A note on firm age and the margins of imports: First evidence from Germany
  19. Bewegung an Geräten
  20. Exploring artful possibilities: a transdisciplinary research on culture, arts and sustainability
  21. Herausforderungen in der Grundschule digital begegnen
  22. Political Culture Paradigm
  23. Arbeitsbedingungen von Journalisten
  24. [Review] Tracy McDonald e Daniel Vandersommers (a cura di), Zoo Studies. A New Humanities, Montreal, McGill¿Queen¿s University Press, 2019, 345 pp.
  25. Limited knowledge flow among stakeholders of critically endangered renosterveld in South Africa
  26. Careerists or Educational Aspirants? – (Re-)entry of European Lifelong Learners into Higher Education
  27. Die Erwartungslücke im Rahmen der externen Abschlussprüfung
  28. Pitfalls in the Study of Democratization
  29. Biological invasions