Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants. / Temperton, Victoria Martine; Märtin, Lea L A; Röder, Daniela et al.
in: Frontiers in Plant Science, Jahrgang 3, Nr. April, 70, 26.04.2012.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Temperton VM, Märtin LLA, Röder D, Lücke A, Kiehl K. Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2012 Apr 26;3(April):70. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00070

Bibtex

@article{df616da3558a4f2a947149910610b1db,
title = "Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants",
abstract = "δ15N signals in plant and soil material integrate over a number of biogeochemical processes related to nitrogen (N) and therefore provide information on net effects of multiple processes on N dynamics. In general little is known in many grassland restoration projects on soil-plant N dynamics in relation to the restoration treatments. In particular, δ15N signals may be a useful tool to assess whether abiotic restoration treatments have produced the desired result. In this study we used the range of abiotic and biotic conditions provided by a restoration experiment to assess to whether the restoration treatments and/or plant functional identity and legume neighborhood affected plant δ15N signals. The restoration treatments consisted of hay transfer and topsoil removal, thus representing increasing restoration effort, from no restoration measures, through biotic manipulation to major abiotic manipulation. We measured δ15N and %N in six different plant species (two non-legumes and four legumes) across the restoration treatments. We found that restoration treatments were clearly reflected in δ15N of the non-legume species, with very depleted δ15N associated with low soil N, and our results suggest this may be linked to uptake of ammonium (rather than nitrate). The two non-legume species differed considerably in their δ15N signals, which may be related to the two species forming different kinds of mycorrhizal symbioses. Plant δ15N signals could clearly separate legumes from non-legumes, but our results did not allow for an assessment of legume neighborhood effects on non-legume δ15N signals. We discuss our results in the light of what the δ15N signals may be telling us about plant-soil N dynamics and their potential value as an indicator for N dynamics in restoration.",
keywords = "Functional type, Legumes, Plant-soil interactions, Restoration, Stable isotopes, Topsoil removal, Biology, Ecosystems Research, Sustainability Science",
author = "Temperton, {Victoria Martine} and M{\"a}rtin, {Lea L A} and Daniela R{\"o}der and Andreas L{\"u}cke and Kathrin Kiehl",
year = "2012",
month = apr,
day = "26",
doi = "10.3389/fpls.2012.00070",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Frontiers in Plant Science",
issn = "1664-462X",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "April",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants

AU - Temperton, Victoria Martine

AU - Märtin, Lea L A

AU - Röder, Daniela

AU - Lücke, Andreas

AU - Kiehl, Kathrin

PY - 2012/4/26

Y1 - 2012/4/26

N2 - δ15N signals in plant and soil material integrate over a number of biogeochemical processes related to nitrogen (N) and therefore provide information on net effects of multiple processes on N dynamics. In general little is known in many grassland restoration projects on soil-plant N dynamics in relation to the restoration treatments. In particular, δ15N signals may be a useful tool to assess whether abiotic restoration treatments have produced the desired result. In this study we used the range of abiotic and biotic conditions provided by a restoration experiment to assess to whether the restoration treatments and/or plant functional identity and legume neighborhood affected plant δ15N signals. The restoration treatments consisted of hay transfer and topsoil removal, thus representing increasing restoration effort, from no restoration measures, through biotic manipulation to major abiotic manipulation. We measured δ15N and %N in six different plant species (two non-legumes and four legumes) across the restoration treatments. We found that restoration treatments were clearly reflected in δ15N of the non-legume species, with very depleted δ15N associated with low soil N, and our results suggest this may be linked to uptake of ammonium (rather than nitrate). The two non-legume species differed considerably in their δ15N signals, which may be related to the two species forming different kinds of mycorrhizal symbioses. Plant δ15N signals could clearly separate legumes from non-legumes, but our results did not allow for an assessment of legume neighborhood effects on non-legume δ15N signals. We discuss our results in the light of what the δ15N signals may be telling us about plant-soil N dynamics and their potential value as an indicator for N dynamics in restoration.

AB - δ15N signals in plant and soil material integrate over a number of biogeochemical processes related to nitrogen (N) and therefore provide information on net effects of multiple processes on N dynamics. In general little is known in many grassland restoration projects on soil-plant N dynamics in relation to the restoration treatments. In particular, δ15N signals may be a useful tool to assess whether abiotic restoration treatments have produced the desired result. In this study we used the range of abiotic and biotic conditions provided by a restoration experiment to assess to whether the restoration treatments and/or plant functional identity and legume neighborhood affected plant δ15N signals. The restoration treatments consisted of hay transfer and topsoil removal, thus representing increasing restoration effort, from no restoration measures, through biotic manipulation to major abiotic manipulation. We measured δ15N and %N in six different plant species (two non-legumes and four legumes) across the restoration treatments. We found that restoration treatments were clearly reflected in δ15N of the non-legume species, with very depleted δ15N associated with low soil N, and our results suggest this may be linked to uptake of ammonium (rather than nitrate). The two non-legume species differed considerably in their δ15N signals, which may be related to the two species forming different kinds of mycorrhizal symbioses. Plant δ15N signals could clearly separate legumes from non-legumes, but our results did not allow for an assessment of legume neighborhood effects on non-legume δ15N signals. We discuss our results in the light of what the δ15N signals may be telling us about plant-soil N dynamics and their potential value as an indicator for N dynamics in restoration.

KW - Functional type

KW - Legumes

KW - Plant-soil interactions

KW - Restoration

KW - Stable isotopes

KW - Topsoil removal

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896029267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/af49f5ef-2062-3604-a8eb-4bcf1e69fe94/

U2 - 10.3389/fpls.2012.00070

DO - 10.3389/fpls.2012.00070

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 22645597

AN - SCOPUS:84896029267

VL - 3

JO - Frontiers in Plant Science

JF - Frontiers in Plant Science

SN - 1664-462X

IS - April

M1 - 70

ER -

Dokumente

DOI