1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Do guided internet-based interventions r...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung

Standard

Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis. / Karyotaki, Eirini; Ebert, David Daniel; Donkin, Liesje et al.
in: Clinical Psychology Review, Jahrgang 63, 01.07.2018, S. 80-92.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung

Harvard

Karyotaki, E, Ebert, DD, Donkin, L, Riper, H, Twisk, J, Burger, S, Rozental, A, Lange, A, Williams, AD, Zarski, AC, Geraedts, A, van Straten, A, Kleiboer, A, Meyer, B, Ünlü Ince, BB, Buntrock, C, Lehr, D, Snoek, FJ, Andrews, G, Andersson, G, Choi, I, Ruwaard, J, Klein, JP, Newby, JM, Schröder, J, Laferton, JAC, Van Bastelaar, K, Imamura, K, Vernmark, K, Boß, L, Sheeber, LB, Kivi, M, Berking, M, Titov, N, Carlbring, P, Johansson, R, Kenter, R, Perini, S, Moritz, S, Nobis, S, Berger, T, Kaldo, V, Forsell, Y, Lindefors, N, Kraepelien, M, Björkelund, C, Kawakami, N & Cuijpers, P 2018, 'Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis', Clinical Psychology Review, Jg. 63, S. 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.007

APA

Karyotaki, E., Ebert, D. D., Donkin, L., Riper, H., Twisk, J., Burger, S., Rozental, A., Lange, A., Williams, A. D., Zarski, A. C., Geraedts, A., van Straten, A., Kleiboer, A., Meyer, B., Ünlü Ince, B. B., Buntrock, C., Lehr, D., Snoek, F. J., Andrews, G., ... Cuijpers, P. (2018). Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 63, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.007

Vancouver

Karyotaki E, Ebert DD, Donkin L, Riper H, Twisk J, Burger S et al. Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2018 Jul 1;63:80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.007

Bibtex

@article{d929a623f7c141fbbb5ecd258732bb72,
title = "Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression?: An individual participant data meta-analysis",
abstract = "Little is known about clinically relevant changes in guided Internet-based interventions for depression. Moreover, methodological and power limitations preclude the identification of patients{\textquoteright} groups that may benefit more from these interventions. This study aimed to investigate response rates, remission rates, and their moderators in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of guided Internet-based interventions for adult depression to control groups using an individual patient data meta-analysis approach. Literature searches in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library resulted in 13,384 abstracts from database inception to January 1, 2016. Twenty-four RCTs (4889 participants) comparing a guided Internet-based intervention with a control group contributed data to the analysis. Missing data were multiply imputed. To examine treatment outcome on response and remission, mixed-effects models with participants nested within studies were used. Response and remission rates were calculated using the Reliable Change Index. The intervention group obtained significantly higher response rates (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 2.17–2.85) and remission rates compared to controls (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 2.07–2.79). The moderator analysis indicated that older participants (OR = 1.01) and native-born participants (1.66) were more likely to respond to treatment compared to younger participants and ethnic minorities respectively. Age (OR = 1.01) and ethnicity (1.73) also moderated the effects of treatment on remission.Moreover, adults with more severe depressive symptoms at baseline were more likely to remit after receiving internet-based treatment (OR = 1.19). Guided Internet-based interventions lead to substantial positive treatment effects on treatment response and remission at post-treatment. Thus, such interventions may complement existing services for depression and potentially reduce the gap between the need and provision of evidence-based treatments.",
keywords = "Psychology, Depression , Internet-based guided self-help, Meta-analysis , Psychotherapy",
author = "Eirini Karyotaki and Ebert, {David Daniel} and Liesje Donkin and Heleen Riper and Jos Twisk and Simone Burger and Alexander Rozental and Alfred Lange and Williams, {Alishia D.} and Zarski, {Anna Carlotta} and Anna Geraedts and {van Straten}, Annemieke and Annet Kleiboer and Bj{\"o}rn Meyer and {{\"U}nl{\"u} Ince}, {Bur{\c c}in B.} and Claudia Buntrock and Dirk Lehr and Snoek, {Frank J.} and Gavin Andrews and Gerhard Andersson and Isabella Choi and Jeroen Ruwaard and Klein, {Jan Philipp} and Newby, {Jill M.} and Johanna Schr{\"o}der and Laferton, {Johannes A.C.} and {Van Bastelaar}, Kim and Kotaro Imamura and Kristofer Vernmark and Leif Bo{\ss} and Sheeber, {Lisa B.} and Marie Kivi and Matthias Berking and Nickolai Titov and Per Carlbring and Robert Johansson and Robin Kenter and Sarah Perini and Steffen Moritz and Stephanie Nobis and Thomas Berger and Viktor Kaldo and Yvonne Forsell and Nils Lindefors and Martin Kraepelien and Cecilia Bj{\"o}rkelund and Norito Kawakami and Pim Cuijpers",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.007",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "80--92",
journal = "Clinical Psychology Review",
issn = "0272-7358",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression?

T2 - An individual participant data meta-analysis

AU - Karyotaki, Eirini

AU - Ebert, David Daniel

AU - Donkin, Liesje

AU - Riper, Heleen

AU - Twisk, Jos

AU - Burger, Simone

AU - Rozental, Alexander

AU - Lange, Alfred

AU - Williams, Alishia D.

AU - Zarski, Anna Carlotta

AU - Geraedts, Anna

AU - van Straten, Annemieke

AU - Kleiboer, Annet

AU - Meyer, Björn

AU - Ünlü Ince, Burçin B.

AU - Buntrock, Claudia

AU - Lehr, Dirk

AU - Snoek, Frank J.

AU - Andrews, Gavin

AU - Andersson, Gerhard

AU - Choi, Isabella

AU - Ruwaard, Jeroen

AU - Klein, Jan Philipp

AU - Newby, Jill M.

AU - Schröder, Johanna

AU - Laferton, Johannes A.C.

AU - Van Bastelaar, Kim

AU - Imamura, Kotaro

AU - Vernmark, Kristofer

AU - Boß, Leif

AU - Sheeber, Lisa B.

AU - Kivi, Marie

AU - Berking, Matthias

AU - Titov, Nickolai

AU - Carlbring, Per

AU - Johansson, Robert

AU - Kenter, Robin

AU - Perini, Sarah

AU - Moritz, Steffen

AU - Nobis, Stephanie

AU - Berger, Thomas

AU - Kaldo, Viktor

AU - Forsell, Yvonne

AU - Lindefors, Nils

AU - Kraepelien, Martin

AU - Björkelund, Cecilia

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Little is known about clinically relevant changes in guided Internet-based interventions for depression. Moreover, methodological and power limitations preclude the identification of patients’ groups that may benefit more from these interventions. This study aimed to investigate response rates, remission rates, and their moderators in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of guided Internet-based interventions for adult depression to control groups using an individual patient data meta-analysis approach. Literature searches in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library resulted in 13,384 abstracts from database inception to January 1, 2016. Twenty-four RCTs (4889 participants) comparing a guided Internet-based intervention with a control group contributed data to the analysis. Missing data were multiply imputed. To examine treatment outcome on response and remission, mixed-effects models with participants nested within studies were used. Response and remission rates were calculated using the Reliable Change Index. The intervention group obtained significantly higher response rates (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 2.17–2.85) and remission rates compared to controls (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 2.07–2.79). The moderator analysis indicated that older participants (OR = 1.01) and native-born participants (1.66) were more likely to respond to treatment compared to younger participants and ethnic minorities respectively. Age (OR = 1.01) and ethnicity (1.73) also moderated the effects of treatment on remission.Moreover, adults with more severe depressive symptoms at baseline were more likely to remit after receiving internet-based treatment (OR = 1.19). Guided Internet-based interventions lead to substantial positive treatment effects on treatment response and remission at post-treatment. Thus, such interventions may complement existing services for depression and potentially reduce the gap between the need and provision of evidence-based treatments.

AB - Little is known about clinically relevant changes in guided Internet-based interventions for depression. Moreover, methodological and power limitations preclude the identification of patients’ groups that may benefit more from these interventions. This study aimed to investigate response rates, remission rates, and their moderators in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of guided Internet-based interventions for adult depression to control groups using an individual patient data meta-analysis approach. Literature searches in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library resulted in 13,384 abstracts from database inception to January 1, 2016. Twenty-four RCTs (4889 participants) comparing a guided Internet-based intervention with a control group contributed data to the analysis. Missing data were multiply imputed. To examine treatment outcome on response and remission, mixed-effects models with participants nested within studies were used. Response and remission rates were calculated using the Reliable Change Index. The intervention group obtained significantly higher response rates (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 2.17–2.85) and remission rates compared to controls (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 2.07–2.79). The moderator analysis indicated that older participants (OR = 1.01) and native-born participants (1.66) were more likely to respond to treatment compared to younger participants and ethnic minorities respectively. Age (OR = 1.01) and ethnicity (1.73) also moderated the effects of treatment on remission.Moreover, adults with more severe depressive symptoms at baseline were more likely to remit after receiving internet-based treatment (OR = 1.19). Guided Internet-based interventions lead to substantial positive treatment effects on treatment response and remission at post-treatment. Thus, such interventions may complement existing services for depression and potentially reduce the gap between the need and provision of evidence-based treatments.

KW - Psychology

KW - Depression

KW - Internet-based guided self-help

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Psychotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048853348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6b1cf937-8118-3622-b597-524d6bcd9e08/

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.007

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 29940401

AN - SCOPUS:85048853348

VL - 63

SP - 80

EP - 92

JO - Clinical Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Psychology Review

SN - 0272-7358

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis

Cuijpers, P., Sijbrandij, M., Koole, S. L., Huibers, M., Berking, M. & Andersson, G., 03.2014, in: Clinical Psychology Review. 34, 2, S. 130-140 11 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis

Cuijpers, P., Driessen, E., Hollon, S. D., van Oppen, P., Barth, J. & Andersson, G., 01.06.2012, in: Clinical Psychology Review. 32, 4, S. 280-291 12 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Are web-based stress management interventions effective as an indirect treatment for depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials

Harrer, M., Nixon, P., Sprenger, A. A., Heber, E., Boß, L., Heckendorf, H., Buntrock, C., Ebert, D. D. & Lehr, D., 13.02.2024, in: BMJ mental health. 27, 1, 8 S., e300846.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

A Universal Digital Stress Management Intervention for Employees: Randomized Controlled Trial with Health-Economic Evaluation

Freund, J., Smit, F., Lehr, D., Zarski, A. C., Berking, M., Riper, H., Funk, B., Ebert, D. D. & Buntrock, C., 22.10.2024, in: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 26, 13 S., e48481.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia reduces insomnia in nurses suffering from shift work disorder: A randomised-controlled pilot trial

Ell, J., Brückner, H. A., Johann, A. F., Steinmetz, L., Güth, L. J., Feige, B., Järnefelt, H., Vallières, A., Frase, L., Domschke, K., Riemann, D., Lehr, D. & Spiegelhalder, K., 23.02.2024, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: Journal of Sleep Research. 14 S., e14193.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Digitale Kontaktnachverfolgung bei Infektionskrankheiten: Projektstudie ZIL-Kontakt

Drews, P., Funk, B., Heger, J., Lehr, D., Zimmer, M. P. & Lemmer, K., 2024, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg.

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und Berichte › Projektberichte › Transfer

Does outcome expectancy predict outcomes in online depression prevention? Secondary analysis of randomised-controlled trials

Thielecke, J., Kuper, P., Ebert, D., Cuijpers, P., Smit, F., Riper, H., Lehr, D. & Buntrock, C., 02.2024, in: Health Expectations. 27, 1, 12 S., e13951.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI