How context affects transdisciplinary research: insights from Asia, Africa and Latin America

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Flurina Schneider
  • Onintsoa Ravaka Andriamihaja
  • R. Ntsiva N. Andriatsitohaina
  • Aung Myin Tun
  • Kiteme Boniface
  • Johanna Jacobi
  • Enrico Celio
  • Clara Léonie Diebold
  • Laby Patrick
  • Phokham Latthachack
  • Jorge Claudio Llopis
  • Lara Lundsgaard-Hansen
  • Peter Messerli
  • Stellah Mukhovi
  • Nwenwe Tun
  • Zo Hasina Rabemananjara
  • Bruno Salomon Ramamonjisoa
  • Sithong Thongmanivong
  • Thoumthone Vongvisouk
  • Daovorn Thongphanh
  • Win Myint
  • Julie Gwendolin Zaehringer

Transdisciplinary research (TDR) has been developed to generate knowledge that effectively fosters the capabilities of various societal actors to realize sustainability transformations. The development of TDR theories, principles, and methods has been largely governed by researchers from the global North and has reflected their contextual conditions. To enable more context-sensitive TDR framing, we sought to identify which contextual characteristics affect the design and implementation of TDR in six case studies in Asia, Latin America, and Africa, and what this means for TDR as a scientific approach. To this end, we distinguished four TDR process elements and identified several associated context dimensions that appeared to influence them. Our analysis showed that contextual characteristics prevalent in many Southern research sites—such as highly volatile socio-political situations and relatively weak support infrastructure—can make TDR a challenging endeavour. However, we also observed a high degree of variation in the contextual characteristics of our sites in the global South, including regarding group deliberation, research freedom, and dominant perceptions of the appropriate relationship between science, society, and policy. We argue that TDR in these contexts requires pragmatic adaptations as well as more fundamental reflection on underlying epistemological concepts around what it means to conduct “good science”, as certain contextual characteristics may influence core epistemological values of TDR.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSustainability Science
Volume17
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)2331-2345
Number of pages15
ISSN1862-4065
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.11.2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).
We acknowledge the support of the Swiss Programme for Research on Global Issues for Development (r4d programme), funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) (Grant no. 152167). JCL was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant P2BEP2_191790. We wish to thank all the participants who contributed to our study, including local authorities, village leaders, smallholders, companies, and NGO/CSO representatives. We also wish to thank Stefanie Burkhart for research assistance and Anu Lannen for editing.

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability
  2. Die Exponate in der Ausstellung Les Immatériaux
  3. Kommunikation, Partizipation und digitale Medien
  4. Das Umweltinformationsgesetz Nordrhein-Westfalen
  5. Wie managen deutsche Unternehmen Nachhaltigkeit?
  6. Local food sovereignty for global food security?
  7. Offene Rituale in der Gruppenarbeit mit Kindern
  8. Psychische Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter
  9. Teaching and Learning in Sustainability Science
  10. Valorization of faba bean (Vicia faba) by-products
  11. “Self-centered, self-promoting, and self-legitimizing”
  12. Culture and the arts in sustainable development
  13. The Changing German Corporate Governance System
  14. Das Burnout-Phänomen am Beispiel des Lehrerberufs.
  15. International Corporate Sustainability Barometer
  16. Comment on "The global tree restoration potential"
  17. A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services
  18. Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation
  19. Regulierung von Stimmrechtsberatern nach ARUG II
  20. Verhaltensprävention, ein unverzichtbarer Schritt
  21. Ziele von Erziehungs- und Bildungspartnerschaften
  22. Sind ausbildende Handwerksbetriebe erfolgreicher?
  23. Action Regulation Across the Adult Lifespan (ARAL)
  24. Draußenschule: Bäume, Sträucher & Hecken entdecken
  25. Strategies in Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  26. Blockchains - Eigentumsfragen, Betrug und Diebstahl
  27. Transdisziplinäre Nähe oder soziologische Distanz?
  28. Thinking beyond Western commercial honeybee hives
  29. A Multivariate Method for Dynamic System Analysis
  30. Emotionale Kompetenz bei Kindern und Jugendlichen