1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Can cross-group contact predict advantag...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized. / Becker, Julia C.; Wright, Stephen C.; Siem, Birte.
in: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 1 Special Issue, 03.2022, S. 123-139.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Becker, JC, Wright, SC & Siem, B 2022, 'Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized', Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, Jg. 29, Nr. 1 Special Issue, S. 123-139. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.9

APA

Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C., & Siem, B. (2022). Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 29(1 Special Issue), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.9

Vancouver

Becker JC, Wright SC, Siem B. Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 2022 Mär;29(1 Special Issue):123-139. doi: 10.4473/TPM29.1.9

Bibtex

@article{dfdd911088ef4462ba2e9905df90d9f4,
title = "Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member{\textquoteright}s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized",
abstract = "Positive cross-group contact with disadvantaged group members can reduce prejudice, and, under certain conditions, increase solidarity-based action intentions among advantaged group members. In the present work, we distinguish between positive contact (friendly, cooperative) versus politicized contact (where group-based injustice is discussed) as well as between benevolent helping offered to the disadvantaged group versus costly solidarity-based actions. We predict that positive contact is related to benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact is related to willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based activism. In two studies (N = 257, N = 329), results support these hypotheses: for nonmigrants in Germany and the United Kingdom, positive contact with migrants, mediated by empathy, positive emotions, and movement identification, was a better predictor of benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact with migrants, mediated by anger and/or movement identification was a better predictor of endorsement of costly solidarity-based activism.",
keywords = "Psychology, positive contact, cross-group contact, costly solidarity-based action, politicized contact",
author = "Becker, {Julia C.} and Wright, {Stephen C.} and Birte Siem",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
doi = "10.4473/TPM29.1.9",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "123--139",
journal = "Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology",
issn = "1972-6325",
publisher = "Cises srl",
number = "1 Special Issue",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized

AU - Becker, Julia C.

AU - Wright, Stephen C.

AU - Siem, Birte

PY - 2022/3

Y1 - 2022/3

N2 - Positive cross-group contact with disadvantaged group members can reduce prejudice, and, under certain conditions, increase solidarity-based action intentions among advantaged group members. In the present work, we distinguish between positive contact (friendly, cooperative) versus politicized contact (where group-based injustice is discussed) as well as between benevolent helping offered to the disadvantaged group versus costly solidarity-based actions. We predict that positive contact is related to benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact is related to willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based activism. In two studies (N = 257, N = 329), results support these hypotheses: for nonmigrants in Germany and the United Kingdom, positive contact with migrants, mediated by empathy, positive emotions, and movement identification, was a better predictor of benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact with migrants, mediated by anger and/or movement identification was a better predictor of endorsement of costly solidarity-based activism.

AB - Positive cross-group contact with disadvantaged group members can reduce prejudice, and, under certain conditions, increase solidarity-based action intentions among advantaged group members. In the present work, we distinguish between positive contact (friendly, cooperative) versus politicized contact (where group-based injustice is discussed) as well as between benevolent helping offered to the disadvantaged group versus costly solidarity-based actions. We predict that positive contact is related to benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact is related to willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based activism. In two studies (N = 257, N = 329), results support these hypotheses: for nonmigrants in Germany and the United Kingdom, positive contact with migrants, mediated by empathy, positive emotions, and movement identification, was a better predictor of benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact with migrants, mediated by anger and/or movement identification was a better predictor of endorsement of costly solidarity-based activism.

KW - Psychology

KW - positive contact

KW - cross-group contact

KW - costly solidarity-based action

KW - politicized contact

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127374209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4473/TPM29.1.9

DO - 10.4473/TPM29.1.9

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85127374209

VL - 29

SP - 123

EP - 139

JO - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology

JF - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology

SN - 1972-6325

IS - 1 Special Issue

ER -

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Space-focused stereotypes and their potential role in group-based disparities in social work services

Essien, I. & Siem, B., 24.04.2025, in: Social Work & Society. 22, 2, S. 1-17 17 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

"White and educated?" Toward a (More) Diverse Climate Movement

Siem, B. & Essien, I., 2025, (Angenommen/Im Druck) in: In-Mind Magazin.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Transfer › begutachtet

Deconstructing and reconstructing diversity in client-provider-relationships of social work

Alberth, L., Kollender, E., Karber, A., Sandermann, P. & Siem, B., 24.04.2024, in: Social Work & Society. 22, 2, S. 1-8

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Key experiences of volunteers in Refugee Aid

Landmann, H., Siem, B., Fuchs, B. & Rohmann, A., 27.07.2023, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies. 16 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions

Gender Audits Forecasting Collaboration, Schaerer, M., Plessis, C. D., Nguyen, M. H. B., Aert, R. C. M. V., Tiokhin, L., Lakens, D., Clemente, E. G., Pfeiffer, T., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Clark, C. J. & Siem, B., 01.11.2023, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 179, 26 S., 104280.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. RiB-Kit (RFID-in-a-Box)
  2. Managers’ incentives and disincentives to engage with integrated reporting or why managers might not adopt integrated reporting
  3. Schulpraxis als Lerngelegenheit?
  4. Empirische Arbeit
  5. Modellierung und Implementierung von Geschäftsprozessen in verteilten Systemen
  6. Medienklangräume
  7. Wir sind drin. Zur Gegenwart digitaler Kulturen
  8. Biogeographical patterns in the diet of the wildcat, Felis silvestris Schreber, in Eurasia: Factors affecting the trophic diversity
  9. Energiegenossenschaften im Kontext einer sozial - ökologischen Transformation der Ökonomie
  10. Studierende können lernen, sich selbst zum Lernen zu motivieren
  11. Infrastructures of Extraction in the Smart City Zones, Finance, and Platforms in New Town Kolkata
  12. Sexualitäten, Geschlechter und Identitäten
  13. Carnivores’ contributions to people in Europe
  14. Openness in Cross-Cultural Work Settings
  15. The fantasy of the organizational One
  16. Sustainable Management compensation and ESG performance
  17. The Americas: Evo's Bolivia: Continuity and Change, C. Farthing Linda & H. Kohl Benjamin . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2014. 272pp
  18. Recycling of organic residues to produce insulation composites
  19. A study on the hot deformation behavior of cast Mg-4Sn-2Ca (TX42) alloy
  20. Rolle
  21. Sprachkompetenz - ein übersehenes Risiko?
  22. The EU as an interorganizational influencer?
  23. Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter des general intellect
  24. Methodische Behandlung interner Materialkreisläufe in der Materialflusskostenrechnung
  25. Successful climate protection via rapid coal phaseout in Germany and North Rhine-Westphalia
  26. Kraftquelle: Kleine Erfolge
  27. Toleranzedikt des Fetischismus
  28. Comparison on Hot Tearing Behavior of Binary Mg–Al, Mg–Y, Mg–Gd, Mg–Zn, and Mg–Ca Alloys
  29. Article 68 CISG
  30. Träume