1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Can cross-group contact predict advantag...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized. / Becker, Julia C.; Wright, Stephen C.; Siem, Birte.
in: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 1 Special Issue, 03.2022, S. 123-139.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Becker, JC, Wright, SC & Siem, B 2022, 'Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized', Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, Jg. 29, Nr. 1 Special Issue, S. 123-139. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.9

APA

Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C., & Siem, B. (2022). Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 29(1 Special Issue), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.9

Vancouver

Becker JC, Wright SC, Siem B. Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 2022 Mär;29(1 Special Issue):123-139. doi: 10.4473/TPM29.1.9

Bibtex

@article{dfdd911088ef4462ba2e9905df90d9f4,
title = "Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member{\textquoteright}s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized",
abstract = "Positive cross-group contact with disadvantaged group members can reduce prejudice, and, under certain conditions, increase solidarity-based action intentions among advantaged group members. In the present work, we distinguish between positive contact (friendly, cooperative) versus politicized contact (where group-based injustice is discussed) as well as between benevolent helping offered to the disadvantaged group versus costly solidarity-based actions. We predict that positive contact is related to benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact is related to willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based activism. In two studies (N = 257, N = 329), results support these hypotheses: for nonmigrants in Germany and the United Kingdom, positive contact with migrants, mediated by empathy, positive emotions, and movement identification, was a better predictor of benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact with migrants, mediated by anger and/or movement identification was a better predictor of endorsement of costly solidarity-based activism.",
keywords = "Psychology, positive contact, cross-group contact, costly solidarity-based action, politicized contact",
author = "Becker, {Julia C.} and Wright, {Stephen C.} and Birte Siem",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
doi = "10.4473/TPM29.1.9",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "123--139",
journal = "Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology",
issn = "1972-6325",
publisher = "Cises srl",
number = "1 Special Issue",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can cross-group contact predict advantaged group member’s willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based actions? Yes, if the contact is politicized

AU - Becker, Julia C.

AU - Wright, Stephen C.

AU - Siem, Birte

PY - 2022/3

Y1 - 2022/3

N2 - Positive cross-group contact with disadvantaged group members can reduce prejudice, and, under certain conditions, increase solidarity-based action intentions among advantaged group members. In the present work, we distinguish between positive contact (friendly, cooperative) versus politicized contact (where group-based injustice is discussed) as well as between benevolent helping offered to the disadvantaged group versus costly solidarity-based actions. We predict that positive contact is related to benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact is related to willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based activism. In two studies (N = 257, N = 329), results support these hypotheses: for nonmigrants in Germany and the United Kingdom, positive contact with migrants, mediated by empathy, positive emotions, and movement identification, was a better predictor of benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact with migrants, mediated by anger and/or movement identification was a better predictor of endorsement of costly solidarity-based activism.

AB - Positive cross-group contact with disadvantaged group members can reduce prejudice, and, under certain conditions, increase solidarity-based action intentions among advantaged group members. In the present work, we distinguish between positive contact (friendly, cooperative) versus politicized contact (where group-based injustice is discussed) as well as between benevolent helping offered to the disadvantaged group versus costly solidarity-based actions. We predict that positive contact is related to benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact is related to willingness to engage in costly solidarity-based activism. In two studies (N = 257, N = 329), results support these hypotheses: for nonmigrants in Germany and the United Kingdom, positive contact with migrants, mediated by empathy, positive emotions, and movement identification, was a better predictor of benevolent helping, whereas politicized contact with migrants, mediated by anger and/or movement identification was a better predictor of endorsement of costly solidarity-based activism.

KW - Psychology

KW - positive contact

KW - cross-group contact

KW - costly solidarity-based action

KW - politicized contact

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127374209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4473/TPM29.1.9

DO - 10.4473/TPM29.1.9

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85127374209

VL - 29

SP - 123

EP - 139

JO - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology

JF - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology

SN - 1972-6325

IS - 1 Special Issue

ER -

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Space-focused stereotypes and their potential role in group-based disparities in social work services

Essien, I. & Siem, B., 24.04.2025, in: Social Work & Society. 22, 2, S. 1-17 17 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

"White and educated?" Toward a (More) Diverse Climate Movement

Siem, B. & Essien, I., 2025, (Angenommen/Im Druck) in: In-Mind Magazin.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Transfer › begutachtet

Deconstructing and reconstructing diversity in client-provider-relationships of social work

Alberth, L., Kollender, E., Karber, A., Sandermann, P. & Siem, B., 24.04.2024, in: Social Work & Society. 22, 2, S. 1-8

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Key experiences of volunteers in Refugee Aid

Landmann, H., Siem, B., Fuchs, B. & Rohmann, A., 27.07.2023, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies. 16 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions

Gender Audits Forecasting Collaboration, Schaerer, M., Plessis, C. D., Nguyen, M. H. B., Aert, R. C. M. V., Tiokhin, L., Lakens, D., Clemente, E. G., Pfeiffer, T., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Clark, C. J. & Siem, B., 01.11.2023, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 179, 26 S., 104280.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Martin Winands

Publikationen

  1. After Occupy
  2. Potential supply and actual use of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas and their surroundings
  3. Delineating boundaries of social-ecological systems for landscape planning
  4. BYOD - Start in die nächste Generation
  5. Selbstöffnung und interpersonaler Input in der psychodynamischen Gruppenpsychotherapie – Eine explorative Studie
  6. Well done (for someone of your gender)! Experimental evidence of teachers’ stereotype-based shifting standards for test grading and elaborated feedback
  7. Strukturelle Kopplungen.
  8. The Form of Becoming
  9. In situ compressive investigations on the effects of solid solution Gd on the texture and lattice strain evolution of Mg
  10. Patterns of organizational (sub)culture and their influence on organizational effectiveness
  11. Fenton process on single and mixture components of phenothiazine pharmaceuticals
  12. Promoting Prevention Success at the Bargaining Table
  13. Public Urban Space Matters!
  14. Understanding and explaining populist radical right parties’ commitment to animal welfare in Western Europe
  15. Cultural Consumption Analysis: Beyond Structure and Agency
  16. Urbane Konfliktzonen
  17. Perverse Bienen
  18. Expected climate change consequences and their role in explaining individual risk judgments.
  19. Wie kann man Problemlösekompetenz in der Lehrerbildung fördern?
  20. Schreibfähigkeit
  21. Die Entwicklung des „Steuerstaates“
  22. Bin ich mein Gehirn?
  23. Can knowledge of priority effects improve outcomes of ecological restoration?
  24. Monster und Freaks
  25. Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in der öffentlichen Verwaltung
  26. Initial fate assessment of teratogenic drug trimipramine and its photo-transformation products - Role of pH, concentration and temperature
  27. Computer als Klangmedium
  28. Die Rhetorik von Computerspielen
  29. Ästhetik des Digitalen
  30. Klimapolitik
  31. Bildersuche