Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. / Genschow, Oliver; Brass, Marcel.
Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility. Hrsg. / Thomas Nadelhoffer; Andrew Monroe. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. S. 13-26 (Advances in Experimental Philosophy).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Genschow, O & Brass, M 2022, Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. in T Nadelhoffer & A Monroe (Hrsg.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility. Advances in Experimental Philosophy, Bloomsbury Academic, London, S. 13-26. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

APA

Genschow, O., & Brass, M. (2022). Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. In T. Nadelhoffer, & A. Monroe (Hrsg.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility (S. 13-26). (Advances in Experimental Philosophy). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

Vancouver

Genschow O, Brass M. Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. in Nadelhoffer T, Monroe A, Hrsg., Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility. London,: Bloomsbury Academic. 2022. S. 13-26. (Advances in Experimental Philosophy). doi: 10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

Bibtex

@inbook{5964769df477424182626d106201c124,
title = "Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility",
abstract = "Oliver Genschow Marcel Brass Free will is a cornerstone of our society and relates to nearly everything we care about. The most prominent example in this respect may be our legal system in which punishment strongly depends on the degree to which a person acted “freely” (e. g. , Newman & Weitzer, 1956) . Thus, not surprisingly, across cultures (Sarkissian et al. , 2010) and ages (Nichols, 2004) , most people believe that they have free will (see also Baumeister et al. , 2009; Nahmias et al. , 2005) . At the same time, there is a long-standing philosophical debate about whether free will actually exists (e. g. , Dennett, 2015; Van Inwagen, 1983) . In the last few decades, prominent voices in cognitive neuroscience and psychology have entered this debate by claiming that free will is nothing more than an illusion (e. g. , Crick, 1994; Harris, 2012; Wegner,... ",
keywords = "Psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Marcel Brass",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-3501-8808-2",
series = "Advances in Experimental Philosophy",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Academic",
pages = "13--26",
editor = "Thomas Nadelhoffer and Andrew Monroe",
booktitle = "Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Brass, Marcel

PY - 2022/1/1

Y1 - 2022/1/1

N2 - Oliver Genschow Marcel Brass Free will is a cornerstone of our society and relates to nearly everything we care about. The most prominent example in this respect may be our legal system in which punishment strongly depends on the degree to which a person acted “freely” (e. g. , Newman & Weitzer, 1956) . Thus, not surprisingly, across cultures (Sarkissian et al. , 2010) and ages (Nichols, 2004) , most people believe that they have free will (see also Baumeister et al. , 2009; Nahmias et al. , 2005) . At the same time, there is a long-standing philosophical debate about whether free will actually exists (e. g. , Dennett, 2015; Van Inwagen, 1983) . In the last few decades, prominent voices in cognitive neuroscience and psychology have entered this debate by claiming that free will is nothing more than an illusion (e. g. , Crick, 1994; Harris, 2012; Wegner,...

AB - Oliver Genschow Marcel Brass Free will is a cornerstone of our society and relates to nearly everything we care about. The most prominent example in this respect may be our legal system in which punishment strongly depends on the degree to which a person acted “freely” (e. g. , Newman & Weitzer, 1956) . Thus, not surprisingly, across cultures (Sarkissian et al. , 2010) and ages (Nichols, 2004) , most people believe that they have free will (see also Baumeister et al. , 2009; Nahmias et al. , 2005) . At the same time, there is a long-standing philosophical debate about whether free will actually exists (e. g. , Dennett, 2015; Van Inwagen, 1983) . In the last few decades, prominent voices in cognitive neuroscience and psychology have entered this debate by claiming that free will is nothing more than an illusion (e. g. , Crick, 1994; Harris, 2012; Wegner,...

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146537130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

DO - 10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-3501-8808-2

T3 - Advances in Experimental Philosophy

SP - 13

EP - 26

BT - Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility

A2 - Nadelhoffer, Thomas

A2 - Monroe, Andrew

PB - Bloomsbury Academic

CY - London,

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Understanding EU-NATO Cooperation
  2. Materials Banking and Resource Repletion, Role of Buildings, and Materials Passports
  3. Technische Reproduzierbarkeit
  4. Debt for Brands
  5. Der Zentrale Runde Tisch der DDR: Wortprotokoll und Dokumente
  6. Grenzen von „Serious Games for Health“
  7. Intra-industry Adjustment to Import Competition
  8. Widerstand
  9. Lehrerqualität zwischen Kompetenz und Ethos
  10. The New European Public Country-by-Country-Reporting Requirement
  11. Losses and gains in translation
  12. De Publieksbijdrage
  13. Medienerziehung in Kindertagesstätten
  14. Anthropologie der Praxis
  15. Emerging Contaminants versus Micro-pollutants
  16. On Gender Statistics in the Art Field and Leading Positions in the International Sphere
  17. Introduction to the special issue:
  18. Analogue Nostalgia: Examining Critiques of Social Media
  19. Becoming Intimately Mobile
  20. Mit Hartz IV zum Aufbruch ins Erwerbsleben?
  21. A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review
  22. Liability rule failures? Evidence from german court decisions.
  23. Evaluating one-shot tournament predictions
  24. Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production
  25. Supporting wild pollinators in a temperate agricultural landscape
  26. Usually hated, sometimes loved:
  27. Erratum zu
  28. AI and urban governance: from the perils of smart cities to Amazon Inc. urbanism
  29. § 292 Haftung bei Herausgabepflicht
  30. Impact of Germany's recent space policy and progress towards a national legislation
  31. How do professional designers engage with sustainability?
  32. Charlotte Moth