Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. / Genschow, Oliver; Brass, Marcel.

Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility. Hrsg. / Thomas Nadelhoffer; Andrew Monroe. London, : Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. S. 13-26 (Advances in Experimental Philosophy).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Genschow, O & Brass, M 2022, Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. in T Nadelhoffer & A Monroe (Hrsg.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility. Advances in Experimental Philosophy, Bloomsbury Academic, London, S. 13-26. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

APA

Genschow, O., & Brass, M. (2022). Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. in T. Nadelhoffer, & A. Monroe (Hrsg.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility (S. 13-26). (Advances in Experimental Philosophy). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

Vancouver

Genschow O, Brass M. Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility. in Nadelhoffer T, Monroe A, Hrsg., Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility. London,: Bloomsbury Academic. 2022. S. 13-26. (Advances in Experimental Philosophy). doi: 10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

Bibtex

@inbook{5964769df477424182626d106201c124,
title = "Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility",
abstract = "Oliver Genschow Marcel Brass Free will is a cornerstone of our society and relates to nearly everything we care about. The most prominent example in this respect may be our legal system in which punishment strongly depends on the degree to which a person acted “freely” (e. g. , Newman & Weitzer, 1956) . Thus, not surprisingly, across cultures (Sarkissian et al. , 2010) and ages (Nichols, 2004) , most people believe that they have free will (see also Baumeister et al. , 2009; Nahmias et al. , 2005) . At the same time, there is a long-standing philosophical debate about whether free will actually exists (e. g. , Dennett, 2015; Van Inwagen, 1983) . In the last few decades, prominent voices in cognitive neuroscience and psychology have entered this debate by claiming that free will is nothing more than an illusion (e. g. , Crick, 1994; Harris, 2012; Wegner,... ",
keywords = "Psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Marcel Brass",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-3501-8808-2",
series = "Advances in Experimental Philosophy",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Academic",
pages = "13--26",
editor = "Thomas Nadelhoffer and Andrew Monroe",
booktitle = "Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Belief in Free Will Relates to Attributions of Intentionality and Judgments of Responsibility

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Brass, Marcel

PY - 2022/1/1

Y1 - 2022/1/1

N2 - Oliver Genschow Marcel Brass Free will is a cornerstone of our society and relates to nearly everything we care about. The most prominent example in this respect may be our legal system in which punishment strongly depends on the degree to which a person acted “freely” (e. g. , Newman & Weitzer, 1956) . Thus, not surprisingly, across cultures (Sarkissian et al. , 2010) and ages (Nichols, 2004) , most people believe that they have free will (see also Baumeister et al. , 2009; Nahmias et al. , 2005) . At the same time, there is a long-standing philosophical debate about whether free will actually exists (e. g. , Dennett, 2015; Van Inwagen, 1983) . In the last few decades, prominent voices in cognitive neuroscience and psychology have entered this debate by claiming that free will is nothing more than an illusion (e. g. , Crick, 1994; Harris, 2012; Wegner,...

AB - Oliver Genschow Marcel Brass Free will is a cornerstone of our society and relates to nearly everything we care about. The most prominent example in this respect may be our legal system in which punishment strongly depends on the degree to which a person acted “freely” (e. g. , Newman & Weitzer, 1956) . Thus, not surprisingly, across cultures (Sarkissian et al. , 2010) and ages (Nichols, 2004) , most people believe that they have free will (see also Baumeister et al. , 2009; Nahmias et al. , 2005) . At the same time, there is a long-standing philosophical debate about whether free will actually exists (e. g. , Dennett, 2015; Van Inwagen, 1983) . In the last few decades, prominent voices in cognitive neuroscience and psychology have entered this debate by claiming that free will is nothing more than an illusion (e. g. , Crick, 1994; Harris, 2012; Wegner,...

KW - Psychology

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1e8d0fe3-a749-3d82-82c2-a256287dacc3/

U2 - 10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

DO - 10.5040/9781350188112.ch-001

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-3501-8808-2

T3 - Advances in Experimental Philosophy

SP - 13

EP - 26

BT - Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Free Will and Responsibility

A2 - Nadelhoffer, Thomas

A2 - Monroe, Andrew

PB - Bloomsbury Academic

CY - London,

ER -

DOI