A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research: Reply to Mori

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenAndere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.)Forschung

Standard

A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research: Reply to Mori. / Oliver, Tom H.; Heard, Matthew S.; Isaac, Nick J.B. et al.
in: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 2, 02.2016, S. 89-92.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenAndere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.)Forschung

Harvard

Oliver, TH, Heard, MS, Isaac, NJB, Roy, DB, Procter, D, Eigenbrod, F, Freckleton, R, Hector, A, Orme, CDL, Petchey, OL, Proença, V, Raffaelli, D, Blake Suttle, K, Mace, GM, Martín-López, B, Woodcock, BA & Bullock, JM 2016, 'A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research: Reply to Mori', Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Jg. 31, Nr. 2, S. 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008

APA

Oliver, T. H., Heard, M. S., Isaac, N. J. B., Roy, D. B., Procter, D., Eigenbrod, F., Freckleton, R., Hector, A., Orme, C. D. L., Petchey, O. L., Proença, V., Raffaelli, D., Blake Suttle, K., Mace, G. M., Martín-López, B., Woodcock, B. A., & Bullock, J. M. (2016). A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research: Reply to Mori. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31(2), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008

Vancouver

Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJB, Roy DB, Procter D, Eigenbrod F et al. A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research: Reply to Mori. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2016 Feb;31(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008

Bibtex

@article{9b4667e94f7d469aa3629f0cd1c2b5ff,
title = "A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research: Reply to Mori",
abstract = "A recent paper by Mori [1] states the need for a unification of studies of {\textquoteleft}engineering{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}ecological{\textquoteright} frameworks of resilience. Engineering resilience focuses on the capacity of a system to recover to equilibrium following some kind of perturbation, while ecological resilience (ER) explicitly recognizes multiple stable states and the capacity for systems to resist {\textquoteleft}regime shifts{\textquoteright} between alternative states. We find Mori's argument somewhat surprising given the number of recent biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B-EF) studies that incorporate aspects of both resistance and recovery (e.g., see references in [2,3]).",
keywords = "Sociology, Gender and Diversity, Sustainability Science",
author = "Oliver, {Tom H.} and Heard, {Matthew S.} and Isaac, {Nick J.B.} and Roy, {David B.} and Deborah Procter and Felix Eigenbrod and Rob Freckleton and Andy Hector and Orme, {C. David L.} and Petchey, {Owen L.} and V{\^a}nia Proen{\c c}a and David Raffaelli and {Blake Suttle}, K. and Mace, {Georgina M.} and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Woodcock, {Ben A.} and Bullock, {James M.}",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "89--92",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research

T2 - Reply to Mori

AU - Oliver, Tom H.

AU - Heard, Matthew S.

AU - Isaac, Nick J.B.

AU - Roy, David B.

AU - Procter, Deborah

AU - Eigenbrod, Felix

AU - Freckleton, Rob

AU - Hector, Andy

AU - Orme, C. David L.

AU - Petchey, Owen L.

AU - Proença, Vânia

AU - Raffaelli, David

AU - Blake Suttle, K.

AU - Mace, Georgina M.

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Woodcock, Ben A.

AU - Bullock, James M.

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - A recent paper by Mori [1] states the need for a unification of studies of ‘engineering’ and ‘ecological’ frameworks of resilience. Engineering resilience focuses on the capacity of a system to recover to equilibrium following some kind of perturbation, while ecological resilience (ER) explicitly recognizes multiple stable states and the capacity for systems to resist ‘regime shifts’ between alternative states. We find Mori's argument somewhat surprising given the number of recent biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B-EF) studies that incorporate aspects of both resistance and recovery (e.g., see references in [2,3]).

AB - A recent paper by Mori [1] states the need for a unification of studies of ‘engineering’ and ‘ecological’ frameworks of resilience. Engineering resilience focuses on the capacity of a system to recover to equilibrium following some kind of perturbation, while ecological resilience (ER) explicitly recognizes multiple stable states and the capacity for systems to resist ‘regime shifts’ between alternative states. We find Mori's argument somewhat surprising given the number of recent biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B-EF) studies that incorporate aspects of both resistance and recovery (e.g., see references in [2,3]).

KW - Sociology

KW - Gender and Diversity

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954290383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/bd9884b5-afe6-3fb1-a940-6387420808ea/

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008

M3 - Other (editorial matter etc.)

C2 - 26774554

AN - SCOPUS:84954290383

VL - 31

SP - 89

EP - 92

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 2

ER -

DOI