A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research: Reply to Mori
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Andere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.) › Forschung
Standard
A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research : Reply to Mori. / Oliver, Tom H.; Heard, Matthew S.; Isaac, Nick J.B. et al.
in: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 2, 02.2016, S. 89-92.Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Andere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.) › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A Synthesis is Emerging between Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function and Ecological Resilience Research
T2 - Reply to Mori
AU - Oliver, Tom H.
AU - Heard, Matthew S.
AU - Isaac, Nick J.B.
AU - Roy, David B.
AU - Procter, Deborah
AU - Eigenbrod, Felix
AU - Freckleton, Rob
AU - Hector, Andy
AU - Orme, C. David L.
AU - Petchey, Owen L.
AU - Proença, Vânia
AU - Raffaelli, David
AU - Blake Suttle, K.
AU - Mace, Georgina M.
AU - Martín-López, Berta
AU - Woodcock, Ben A.
AU - Bullock, James M.
PY - 2016/2
Y1 - 2016/2
N2 - A recent paper by Mori [1] states the need for a unification of studies of ‘engineering’ and ‘ecological’ frameworks of resilience. Engineering resilience focuses on the capacity of a system to recover to equilibrium following some kind of perturbation, while ecological resilience (ER) explicitly recognizes multiple stable states and the capacity for systems to resist ‘regime shifts’ between alternative states. We find Mori's argument somewhat surprising given the number of recent biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B-EF) studies that incorporate aspects of both resistance and recovery (e.g., see references in [2,3]).
AB - A recent paper by Mori [1] states the need for a unification of studies of ‘engineering’ and ‘ecological’ frameworks of resilience. Engineering resilience focuses on the capacity of a system to recover to equilibrium following some kind of perturbation, while ecological resilience (ER) explicitly recognizes multiple stable states and the capacity for systems to resist ‘regime shifts’ between alternative states. We find Mori's argument somewhat surprising given the number of recent biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B-EF) studies that incorporate aspects of both resistance and recovery (e.g., see references in [2,3]).
KW - Sociology
KW - Gender and Diversity
KW - Sustainability Science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954290383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008
DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.008
M3 - Other (editorial matter etc.)
C2 - 26774554
AN - SCOPUS:84954290383
VL - 31
SP - 89
EP - 92
JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
SN - 0169-5347
IS - 2
ER -