More than Yield: Ecosystem Services of Traditional versus Modern Crop Varieties Revisited

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

More than Yield: Ecosystem Services of Traditional versus Modern Crop Varieties Revisited . / Ficiciyan, Anoush; Loos, Jacqueline; Sievers-Glotzbach, Stefanie et al.
In: Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2834, 09.08.2018.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Ficiciyan A, Loos J, Sievers-Glotzbach S, Tscharntke T. More than Yield: Ecosystem Services of Traditional versus Modern Crop Varieties Revisited . Sustainability. 2018 Aug 9;10(8):2834. doi: 10.3390/su10082834

Bibtex

@article{37e36f02e5cc46808c1037848dffcdb2,
title = "More than Yield: Ecosystem Services of Traditional versus Modern Crop Varieties Revisited ",
abstract = "Agricultural intensification with modern plant breeding focuses on few high-yielding crops and varieties. The loss of traditional crop species and variety diversity contributes to the current decline of provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services, as reported in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Access to local and adapted varieties is pivotal for resilient agroecosystems, in particular under current global change. We reviewed the scientific literature to understand the role of different crop varieties for ecosystem services, comparing the performance and perception of traditional landraces versus modern varieties and ask the following questions: 1. Do landraces and modern varieties differ in terms of provisioning and regulating ecosystem services? 2. When and why do farmers prefer cultural ecosystem services of landraces over high-yielding varieties? Based on 41 publications, our results document that modern varieties are preferred over landraces because of their typically higher provisioning services such as crop yield. However, landraces often guarantee higher provisioning services under non-optimal farming conditions. Landraces can show high resilience under harsh environmental conditions and are a trusted source achieving stable crop yield (e.g., under droughts stress). Regulating services such as resistance against pests and diseases appear to often become lost during breeding for high-yielding, modern varieties. Furthermore, small-scale farmers typically prefer local landraces due to regional cultural features such as family traditions and cooking characteristics for special dishes. In conclusion, both landraces and modern varieties have merit depending on the farmers{\textquoteright} priorities and the social-ecological context. In any case, maintaining and restoring the huge diversity of landrace varieties is necessary for sustaining current and future needs.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, agrobiodiversity, ecosystem services, Food sovereignty, seed commons, variety diversity, protection laws, landraces, agrobiodiversity, ecosystem services, food sovereignty, seed commons, variety diversity, protection laws, landraces",
author = "Anoush Ficiciyan and Jacqueline Loos and Stefanie Sievers-Glotzbach and Teja Tscharntke",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 by the authors.",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
day = "9",
doi = "10.3390/su10082834",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - More than Yield

T2 - Ecosystem Services of Traditional versus Modern Crop Varieties Revisited

AU - Ficiciyan, Anoush

AU - Loos, Jacqueline

AU - Sievers-Glotzbach, Stefanie

AU - Tscharntke, Teja

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 by the authors.

PY - 2018/8/9

Y1 - 2018/8/9

N2 - Agricultural intensification with modern plant breeding focuses on few high-yielding crops and varieties. The loss of traditional crop species and variety diversity contributes to the current decline of provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services, as reported in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Access to local and adapted varieties is pivotal for resilient agroecosystems, in particular under current global change. We reviewed the scientific literature to understand the role of different crop varieties for ecosystem services, comparing the performance and perception of traditional landraces versus modern varieties and ask the following questions: 1. Do landraces and modern varieties differ in terms of provisioning and regulating ecosystem services? 2. When and why do farmers prefer cultural ecosystem services of landraces over high-yielding varieties? Based on 41 publications, our results document that modern varieties are preferred over landraces because of their typically higher provisioning services such as crop yield. However, landraces often guarantee higher provisioning services under non-optimal farming conditions. Landraces can show high resilience under harsh environmental conditions and are a trusted source achieving stable crop yield (e.g., under droughts stress). Regulating services such as resistance against pests and diseases appear to often become lost during breeding for high-yielding, modern varieties. Furthermore, small-scale farmers typically prefer local landraces due to regional cultural features such as family traditions and cooking characteristics for special dishes. In conclusion, both landraces and modern varieties have merit depending on the farmers’ priorities and the social-ecological context. In any case, maintaining and restoring the huge diversity of landrace varieties is necessary for sustaining current and future needs.

AB - Agricultural intensification with modern plant breeding focuses on few high-yielding crops and varieties. The loss of traditional crop species and variety diversity contributes to the current decline of provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services, as reported in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Access to local and adapted varieties is pivotal for resilient agroecosystems, in particular under current global change. We reviewed the scientific literature to understand the role of different crop varieties for ecosystem services, comparing the performance and perception of traditional landraces versus modern varieties and ask the following questions: 1. Do landraces and modern varieties differ in terms of provisioning and regulating ecosystem services? 2. When and why do farmers prefer cultural ecosystem services of landraces over high-yielding varieties? Based on 41 publications, our results document that modern varieties are preferred over landraces because of their typically higher provisioning services such as crop yield. However, landraces often guarantee higher provisioning services under non-optimal farming conditions. Landraces can show high resilience under harsh environmental conditions and are a trusted source achieving stable crop yield (e.g., under droughts stress). Regulating services such as resistance against pests and diseases appear to often become lost during breeding for high-yielding, modern varieties. Furthermore, small-scale farmers typically prefer local landraces due to regional cultural features such as family traditions and cooking characteristics for special dishes. In conclusion, both landraces and modern varieties have merit depending on the farmers’ priorities and the social-ecological context. In any case, maintaining and restoring the huge diversity of landrace varieties is necessary for sustaining current and future needs.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - agrobiodiversity

KW - ecosystem services

KW - Food sovereignty

KW - seed commons

KW - variety diversity

KW - protection laws

KW - landraces

KW - agrobiodiversity

KW - ecosystem services

KW - food sovereignty

KW - seed commons

KW - variety diversity

KW - protection laws

KW - landraces

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054932431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/04a29f26-6ff4-3641-8425-0df0631070d0/

U2 - 10.3390/su10082834

DO - 10.3390/su10082834

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 8

M1 - 2834

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Polarization of Time and Income
  2. Efficient supplies to assembly areas from storage stages
  3. Behavioural patterns of nocturnal carabid beetles determined by direct observations under red-light conditions
  4. Remotely sensed effectiveness assessments of protected areas lack a common framework
  5. Zukünfte des Computers
  6. Geodetic rays and fibers in periodic graphs
  7. Computer als Medium (Hyperkult VI)
  8. Studiengang "Master in Auditing" an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
  9. Reality Mining
  10. Way out of the Supply Crises through Risk Minimization - Metrological Comparison of two Polypropylene Materials and Examination with Six Sigma Methods
  11. Comparison of different methods for the measurement of ammonia volatilization after urea application in Henan Province, China
  12. Theories of democratization
  13. Transport in dynamical astronomy and multibody problems
  14. Primed Goals and Primed Actions
  15. Adaptation strategies for reducing vulnerability to future environmental change
  16. Credit Constraints and Margins of Import
  17. Its only cannibalism if we’re equals”
  18. Advanced ice-clamping control in the context of Industry 4.0
  19. From the environmental state to the sustainability state? Conceptualization, indicators, and examples
  20. Typisierung des Umweltmanagements von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Greenteams mittels der Methode der Clusteranalyse
  21. Expectations of Health Tourists in Germany - Illusions and Reality.
  22. The technology-mindset interactions
  23. Charity and finance in the university
  24. Rebound effects
  25. Ob man etwas tun kann oder nicht, ist eine rein mechanische oder materielle Frage
  26. Living on the slopes: entrepreneurial preparedness in a context under continuous threat
  27. Nachhaltigkeitsinformatik
  28. Neue deutsche Härte
  29. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
  30. Public Value
  31. Der Sandbox Innovation Process: Wie Vielfalt in Open-Innovation-Communities genutzt werden

Press / Media

  1. Neapolitanische Moderne