Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Authors

This article summarizes why political culture studies have been hesitant to analyze the aggregate effect of mass beliefs on democracy. It determines that this has much to do with the widespread assumption that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can be inferred from individual-level findings. It also illustrates that this assumption actually represents an ‘individualistic fallacy’. It considers an argument that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can only be analyzed at the aggregate level, because democracy only exists at this level. The article ends with a report of the findings from recent studies, which show that mass beliefs have indeed an aggregate effect on the emergence and survival of democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics
EditorsCarles Boix, Robert E. Goodin
Number of pages20
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date02.09.2009
Pages297-316
ISBN (print)978-0199566020, 019956602X
ISBN (electronic)9780191577482
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02.09.2009
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Several Contributors 2007. All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • Politics
  • Gender and Diversity
  • Aggregate level, Democracy, Individual-level findings, Individualistic fallacy, Mass beliefs, Political culture studies