Learning to collaborate while collaborating: advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Learning to collaborate while collaborating: advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research. / Freeth, Rebecca; Caniglia, Guido.
In: Sustainability Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 247-261.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{16df9a132de24db684ceeb3e7f963250,
title = "Learning to collaborate while collaborating: advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research",
abstract = "Interdisciplinary collaboration has become mainstream practice for sustainability researchers. However, interdisciplinary research teams encounter numerous challenges for which they may find themselves under-prepared. In this article, we challenge the often-held assumption that researchers already know how to collaborate when entering interdisciplinary research teams and argue that, if we want to enhance interdisciplinary sustainability research, we need to take collaboration and its challenges seriously. First, we suggest thinking about interdisciplinary research collaborations as spaces that comprise epistemic, social, symbolic, spatial, and temporal dimensions and that produce different degrees of comfort and discomfort for researchers. Thinking about collaborations in this way supports a more systematic understanding of collaborative challenges. Second, we make a proposal for learning to collaborate while collaborating, so as to tackle challenges of interdisciplinary research. Drawing on a literature review and on experiences in the project Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation, we argue for advancing collaborative interdisciplinary research for sustainability by creating and engaging in collaborations in ways that prioritize learning to collaborate. We outline a strategy for learning to collaborate while collaborating, which implies: (1) creating conditions for learning to take place, which includes paying attention to discomfort as a trigger for learning and (2) engaging in collaborations in ways that strengthen researchers{\textquoteright} collaborative capacities by cultivating particular orientations, knowledge and skills. The fundamental inquiry is whether and how learning to collaborate has a role in more fully realizing the inspiring potentials and ambitious goals of interdisciplinary research for sustainability.",
keywords = "Collaborative capacities, Collaborative teams, Comfort and discomfort, Epistemic living spaces, Learning, Sustainability science, Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Rebecca Freeth and Guido Caniglia",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11625-019-00701-z",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "247--261",
journal = "Sustainability Science",
issn = "1862-4065",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning to collaborate while collaborating

T2 - advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research

AU - Freeth, Rebecca

AU - Caniglia, Guido

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Interdisciplinary collaboration has become mainstream practice for sustainability researchers. However, interdisciplinary research teams encounter numerous challenges for which they may find themselves under-prepared. In this article, we challenge the often-held assumption that researchers already know how to collaborate when entering interdisciplinary research teams and argue that, if we want to enhance interdisciplinary sustainability research, we need to take collaboration and its challenges seriously. First, we suggest thinking about interdisciplinary research collaborations as spaces that comprise epistemic, social, symbolic, spatial, and temporal dimensions and that produce different degrees of comfort and discomfort for researchers. Thinking about collaborations in this way supports a more systematic understanding of collaborative challenges. Second, we make a proposal for learning to collaborate while collaborating, so as to tackle challenges of interdisciplinary research. Drawing on a literature review and on experiences in the project Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation, we argue for advancing collaborative interdisciplinary research for sustainability by creating and engaging in collaborations in ways that prioritize learning to collaborate. We outline a strategy for learning to collaborate while collaborating, which implies: (1) creating conditions for learning to take place, which includes paying attention to discomfort as a trigger for learning and (2) engaging in collaborations in ways that strengthen researchers’ collaborative capacities by cultivating particular orientations, knowledge and skills. The fundamental inquiry is whether and how learning to collaborate has a role in more fully realizing the inspiring potentials and ambitious goals of interdisciplinary research for sustainability.

AB - Interdisciplinary collaboration has become mainstream practice for sustainability researchers. However, interdisciplinary research teams encounter numerous challenges for which they may find themselves under-prepared. In this article, we challenge the often-held assumption that researchers already know how to collaborate when entering interdisciplinary research teams and argue that, if we want to enhance interdisciplinary sustainability research, we need to take collaboration and its challenges seriously. First, we suggest thinking about interdisciplinary research collaborations as spaces that comprise epistemic, social, symbolic, spatial, and temporal dimensions and that produce different degrees of comfort and discomfort for researchers. Thinking about collaborations in this way supports a more systematic understanding of collaborative challenges. Second, we make a proposal for learning to collaborate while collaborating, so as to tackle challenges of interdisciplinary research. Drawing on a literature review and on experiences in the project Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation, we argue for advancing collaborative interdisciplinary research for sustainability by creating and engaging in collaborations in ways that prioritize learning to collaborate. We outline a strategy for learning to collaborate while collaborating, which implies: (1) creating conditions for learning to take place, which includes paying attention to discomfort as a trigger for learning and (2) engaging in collaborations in ways that strengthen researchers’ collaborative capacities by cultivating particular orientations, knowledge and skills. The fundamental inquiry is whether and how learning to collaborate has a role in more fully realizing the inspiring potentials and ambitious goals of interdisciplinary research for sustainability.

KW - Collaborative capacities

KW - Collaborative teams

KW - Comfort and discomfort

KW - Epistemic living spaces

KW - Learning

KW - Sustainability science

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066246717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11625-019-00701-z

DO - 10.1007/s11625-019-00701-z

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85066246717

VL - 15

SP - 247

EP - 261

JO - Sustainability Science

JF - Sustainability Science

SN - 1862-4065

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Non-fatal burden of disease due to mental disorders in the Netherlands
  2. Comfortable Time Headways under Different Visibility Conditions
  3. Biological Computer Laboratory
  4. Towards a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer
  5. Article 13
  6. Bridging scenario planning and backcasting
  7. Reconfigurable Control System for Plants with Variable Structure
  8. Daniel Fiott (ed.), The csdp in 2020: The EU’s legacy and ambition in security and defence
  9. A directional modification of the Levkovitch-Svendsen cross-hardening model based on the stress deviator
  10. The impact of partially missing communities on the reliability of centrality measures
  11. Effect of laser peening process parameters and sequences on residual stress profiles
  12. Exemplary versus statistical evidence?
  13. Subsistence and substitutability in consumer preferences
  14. Das relationale Apriori Wiens / Das städtische Apriori des Relationalismus
  15. Machine Art in the Twentieth Century
  16. Schreibt Ihr Unternehmen auch "grüne" Zahlen?
  17. Tschick
  18. Legal Parameters of Space Tourism
  19. Digital Games and Fan-Discourse
  20. Joint calibration of Machine Vision subsystems for robuster surrounding 3D perception
  21. Ge-/Beschriebenes Gesicht
  22. The Pricing of Default-free Interest Rate Cap, Floor, and Collar Agreements
  23. Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators
  24. Microstructure by design
  25. Welcome to the Glitch and Make Some Noise: Understanding Media through Audio Hacking
  26. On Molecular Complexity Indices.
  27. How Big Does Big Data Need to Be?
  28. Modelling and simulation of dynamic microstructure evolution of aluminium alloys during thermomechanically coupled extrusion process
  29. On the Power of an Open Scientific Approach to Actions