Gender differences on general knowledge tests: Are they due to Differential Item Functioning?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Gender differences on general knowledge tests: Are they due to Differential Item Functioning? / Steinmayr, Ricarda; Bergold, Sebastian; Margraf-Stiksrud, Jutta et al.
In: Intelligence, Vol. 50, 01.05.2015, p. 164 - 174.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Steinmayr R, Bergold S, Margraf-Stiksrud J, Freund PA. Gender differences on general knowledge tests: Are they due to Differential Item Functioning? Intelligence. 2015 May 1;50:164 - 174. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.001

Bibtex

@article{9201ac35c49d4c6c88176b24df7a9ae9,
title = "Gender differences on general knowledge tests: Are they due to Differential Item Functioning?",
abstract = "Gender differences on knowledge tests favoring men are among the most stable gender differences found in cognitive ability measures. Even though several attempts have been made to explain this finding, most studies have not sufficiently considered methodological aspects such as Differential Item Functioning (DIF). The present study investigated whether a German general knowledge test would show gender differences and whether these gender differences could be explained by DIF. To this end, we administered a knowledge test to a sample of N = 977 German high-school students. We observed a large gender difference in the total score of the general knowledge test (|d| = 0.78). On the basis of a nonparametric DIF-detection approach, we found that 40 of the 84 items showed a substantial amount of DIF. Eliminating those items from the overall knowledge test score reduced the observed gender difference to |d| = 0.32. Results are discussed with regard to gender differences on knowledge tests in general and methodological considerations.",
keywords = "Psychology, Differential Item Functioning, Gender differences, Intelligence, Knowledge",
author = "Ricarda Steinmayr and Sebastian Bergold and Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud and Freund, {Philipp Alexander}",
year = "2015",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.001",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "164 -- 174",
journal = "Intelligence",
issn = "0160-2896",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences on general knowledge tests

T2 - Are they due to Differential Item Functioning?

AU - Steinmayr, Ricarda

AU - Bergold, Sebastian

AU - Margraf-Stiksrud, Jutta

AU - Freund, Philipp Alexander

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Gender differences on knowledge tests favoring men are among the most stable gender differences found in cognitive ability measures. Even though several attempts have been made to explain this finding, most studies have not sufficiently considered methodological aspects such as Differential Item Functioning (DIF). The present study investigated whether a German general knowledge test would show gender differences and whether these gender differences could be explained by DIF. To this end, we administered a knowledge test to a sample of N = 977 German high-school students. We observed a large gender difference in the total score of the general knowledge test (|d| = 0.78). On the basis of a nonparametric DIF-detection approach, we found that 40 of the 84 items showed a substantial amount of DIF. Eliminating those items from the overall knowledge test score reduced the observed gender difference to |d| = 0.32. Results are discussed with regard to gender differences on knowledge tests in general and methodological considerations.

AB - Gender differences on knowledge tests favoring men are among the most stable gender differences found in cognitive ability measures. Even though several attempts have been made to explain this finding, most studies have not sufficiently considered methodological aspects such as Differential Item Functioning (DIF). The present study investigated whether a German general knowledge test would show gender differences and whether these gender differences could be explained by DIF. To this end, we administered a knowledge test to a sample of N = 977 German high-school students. We observed a large gender difference in the total score of the general knowledge test (|d| = 0.78). On the basis of a nonparametric DIF-detection approach, we found that 40 of the 84 items showed a substantial amount of DIF. Eliminating those items from the overall knowledge test score reduced the observed gender difference to |d| = 0.32. Results are discussed with regard to gender differences on knowledge tests in general and methodological considerations.

KW - Psychology

KW - Differential Item Functioning

KW - Gender differences

KW - Intelligence

KW - Knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928348278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.001

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 50

SP - 164

EP - 174

JO - Intelligence

JF - Intelligence

SN - 0160-2896

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Joshua Simon

Publications

  1. General strategies to increase the repeatability in non-target screening by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry
  2. Happy just because. A cross-cultural study on subjective wellbeing in three Indigenous societies
  3. Selbstbestimmung und Classroom-Management
  4. Delegitimisation through Evaluation: Discursive Appraisal of the National Grazing Reserve Bill in Online Media Discourse
  5. Between world models and model worlds
  6. Geistessterben
  7. Miscellaneous Articles
  8. A plea for realistic pessimism
  9. What’s Hot: Machine Learning for the Quantified Self
  10. Integrative Management of Sustainability Performance, Measurement and Reporting
  11. Multiscale process simulation of residual stress fields of laser beam welded precipitation hardened AA6082
  12. Field measurement of ammonia emissions after nitrogen fertilization-A comparison between micrometeorological and chamber methods
  13. How to evaluate effects of pesticides in terrestrial ecosystems
  14. Binnendifferenzierung in der Schulpraxis
  15. Heat and light
  16. Sustainable Entrepreneurship – Creating Environmental Solutions
  17. Engaging creatively with tension in collaborative research
  18. VIPs in der Lesesozialisation ?
  19. Too precise to pursue
  20. An in vitro test for corrosion and cytocompatibility of two magnesium alloys
  21. Incremental contribution of pollination and other ecosystem services to agricultural productivity
  22. Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence
  23. Characterization of the Basic Types of Lunar Highland Breccias by Quantitative Textural Analysis
  24. Scenes of Empowerment: Virtual Racial Diversity and Digital Divides
  25. The justice dimension of sustainability
  26. Efficacy of an internet-based self-help intervention to reduce co-occurring alcohol misuse and depression symptoms in adults
  27. Einleitung
  28. Sozialwirtschaft
  29. To the unknown reader: Constructing absent readership in the eighteenth-century novel: Fielding, Sterne and Richardson
  30. Governing Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture - Taking Stock of an Emerging Field of Research
  31. Cycling at varying load
  32. The tip of the iceberg: laptop music and the information-technological transformation of music