Errors in Working with Office Computers: A First Validation of a Taxonomy for Observed Errors in a Field Setting

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Errors in Working with Office Computers: A First Validation of a Taxonomy for Observed Errors in a Field Setting. / Zapf, Dieter; Frese, Michael.
In: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, No. 4, 01.10.1992, p. 311-339.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c4cc1835d396406dbc42f585587f945c,
title = "Errors in Working with Office Computers: A First Validation of a Taxonomy for Observed Errors in a Field Setting",
abstract = "An action-oriented taxonomy of errors in human-computer interaction in the office differentiated four classes: functionality problems, usability problems, interaction problems, and inefficient behavior. Functionality problems were differentiated in how they affect the action process. Usability problems were differentiated according to levels of action regulation and steps in the action process. For example, conscious strategies were differentiated from automatic ones. To examine the taxonomy's construct validation, several hypotheses regarding error-handling time, need for external support, complexity at work, and novices versus experts were tested in a field study of 198. {\textcopyright} 1992, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Dieter Zapf and Michael Frese",
year = "1992",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10447319209526046",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "311--339",
journal = "International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction",
issn = "1044-7318",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Errors in Working with Office Computers

T2 - A First Validation of a Taxonomy for Observed Errors in a Field Setting

AU - Zapf, Dieter

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 1992/10/1

Y1 - 1992/10/1

N2 - An action-oriented taxonomy of errors in human-computer interaction in the office differentiated four classes: functionality problems, usability problems, interaction problems, and inefficient behavior. Functionality problems were differentiated in how they affect the action process. Usability problems were differentiated according to levels of action regulation and steps in the action process. For example, conscious strategies were differentiated from automatic ones. To examine the taxonomy's construct validation, several hypotheses regarding error-handling time, need for external support, complexity at work, and novices versus experts were tested in a field study of 198. © 1992, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

AB - An action-oriented taxonomy of errors in human-computer interaction in the office differentiated four classes: functionality problems, usability problems, interaction problems, and inefficient behavior. Functionality problems were differentiated in how they affect the action process. Usability problems were differentiated according to levels of action regulation and steps in the action process. For example, conscious strategies were differentiated from automatic ones. To examine the taxonomy's construct validation, several hypotheses regarding error-handling time, need for external support, complexity at work, and novices versus experts were tested in a field study of 198. © 1992, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21144483768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9bde47bd-44a5-344b-bf01-aa2af7c00bc2/

U2 - 10.1080/10447319209526046

DO - 10.1080/10447319209526046

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:21144483768

VL - 4

SP - 311

EP - 339

JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

SN - 1044-7318

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Erratum to "Generic functions of railway stations-A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria" [Transp. Policy 18 (2010) 446-455]
  2. Evaluation of a Four-Week Online Resilience Training Program for Multiple Sclerosis Patients
  3. Learning-related emotions in multimedia learning
  4. Creating Value from in-Vehicle Data
  5. Instruments for co-operative planning in spatial management concerned with flooding issues
  6. Separable models for interconnected production-inventory systems
  7. I&EC 18-Small particle size magnesium in one-pot Grignard-Zerewitinoff reactions: Kinetics of and practical application to reductive dechlorination of persistent organic pollutants
  8. Challenges for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science in transitioning social-ecological systems
  9. No Concept of form within Sight Can System Theory help us?
  10. Agile Portfolio Management Patterns
  11. Influence of Equal-Channel Angular Pressing on the Microstructure and Texture of Mg-Zn-Y-Zr-RE Alloy Sheets
  12. Visual Frames – Framing Visuals
  13. Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression?
  14. Educational reconstruction as model for the theory-based design of student-centered learning environments in electrical engineering courses
  15. Automatic feature selection for anomaly detection
  16. Understanding Records. A Field Guide to Recording Practice
  17. Dealing with inclusion–teachers’ assessment of internal and external resources
  18. Clustering design science research based on the nature of the designed artifact
  19. Reconciling conservation and development in protected areas of the Global South