The recent double paradigm shift in restoration ecology
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Authors
The fields of ecology and ecological restoration possess an enormous potential for cross-fertilization of ideas and information. Ecology could play a major role in informing practical restoration, whereas restoration projects, often situated in quite extreme environments, provide an excellent opportunity to test ecological theories. Efforts to base restoration on more of a scientific foundation, however, have recently started gathering momentum, following the call for such a link by Tony Bradshaw in 1987. On another level, as we gather more experience and information from restoration projects, it is becoming equally clear that often neglected socioeconomic and political aspects of restoration should not be forgotten in the overall approach to restoration. The two paradigm shifts in ecological restoration, toward more scientific foundation and better inclusion of socioeconomic limits and opportunities, locate restoration firmly in the transdisciplinary arena, with all the concomitant challenges and opportunities. In this sense, ecological restoration could be compared to the medical profession, where both a sound knowledge of science and human nature are a prerequisite for success in healing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Restoration Ecology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 344-347 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISSN | 1061-2971 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.06.2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
- Arts, Ecological restoration, Paradigm shift, Science
- Biology
- Ecosystems Research