Environmental justice and care: critical emancipatory contributions to sustainability discourse

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Environmental justice and care: critical emancipatory contributions to sustainability discourse. / Gottschlich, Daniela; Bellina, Leonie.
In: Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 941-953.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6a5f1af2ed1e489e85d7b7fade08aa48,
title = "Environmental justice and care: critical emancipatory contributions to sustainability discourse",
abstract = "Sustainability has become a powerful discourse, guiding the efforts of various stakeholders to find strategies for dealing with current and future social-ecological crises. To overcome the latter, we argue that sustainability discourse needs to be based on a critical-emancipatory conceptualization. Therefore, we engage two such approaches—environmental justice approaches informed by a plural understanding of justice and feminist political economy ones focusing on care—and their analytical potential for productive critique of normative assumptions in the dominant sustainability discourse. Both of these approaches highlight aspects of sustainability that are particularly relevant today. First, although sustainable development was conceptualized from the outset based upon a twofold notion of justice (intra- and intergenerational), the integration of justice in the dominant sustainability discourse and praxis often manifests merely as a normative aspiration. Meanwhile, the environmental justice and care approaches offer conceptualizations of justice that can act as a powerful lever and as transformation-strategy. Second, the dominant sustainability discourse largely remains within a neoliberal economic framework that continues to promote economic growth as the means to reach prosperity while neglecting the bases of every economy: care work and nature. Its focus lies solely on paid work and the market economy. By integrating (a) social and ecological {\textquoteleft}reproductivity{\textquoteright} (unpaid care and subsistence work as well as nature) and (b) democratic processes for just distribution of environmental burdens and benefits, as well as participatory equity in relevant decision making, feminist political economy and environmental justice approaches offer substantial strategies towards building humane, just and caring societies.",
keywords = "Environmental justice, Feminist economics, Sustainability to come, Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Daniela Gottschlich and Leonie Bellina",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-016-9761-9",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "941--953",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental justice and care

T2 - critical emancipatory contributions to sustainability discourse

AU - Gottschlich, Daniela

AU - Bellina, Leonie

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Sustainability has become a powerful discourse, guiding the efforts of various stakeholders to find strategies for dealing with current and future social-ecological crises. To overcome the latter, we argue that sustainability discourse needs to be based on a critical-emancipatory conceptualization. Therefore, we engage two such approaches—environmental justice approaches informed by a plural understanding of justice and feminist political economy ones focusing on care—and their analytical potential for productive critique of normative assumptions in the dominant sustainability discourse. Both of these approaches highlight aspects of sustainability that are particularly relevant today. First, although sustainable development was conceptualized from the outset based upon a twofold notion of justice (intra- and intergenerational), the integration of justice in the dominant sustainability discourse and praxis often manifests merely as a normative aspiration. Meanwhile, the environmental justice and care approaches offer conceptualizations of justice that can act as a powerful lever and as transformation-strategy. Second, the dominant sustainability discourse largely remains within a neoliberal economic framework that continues to promote economic growth as the means to reach prosperity while neglecting the bases of every economy: care work and nature. Its focus lies solely on paid work and the market economy. By integrating (a) social and ecological ‘reproductivity’ (unpaid care and subsistence work as well as nature) and (b) democratic processes for just distribution of environmental burdens and benefits, as well as participatory equity in relevant decision making, feminist political economy and environmental justice approaches offer substantial strategies towards building humane, just and caring societies.

AB - Sustainability has become a powerful discourse, guiding the efforts of various stakeholders to find strategies for dealing with current and future social-ecological crises. To overcome the latter, we argue that sustainability discourse needs to be based on a critical-emancipatory conceptualization. Therefore, we engage two such approaches—environmental justice approaches informed by a plural understanding of justice and feminist political economy ones focusing on care—and their analytical potential for productive critique of normative assumptions in the dominant sustainability discourse. Both of these approaches highlight aspects of sustainability that are particularly relevant today. First, although sustainable development was conceptualized from the outset based upon a twofold notion of justice (intra- and intergenerational), the integration of justice in the dominant sustainability discourse and praxis often manifests merely as a normative aspiration. Meanwhile, the environmental justice and care approaches offer conceptualizations of justice that can act as a powerful lever and as transformation-strategy. Second, the dominant sustainability discourse largely remains within a neoliberal economic framework that continues to promote economic growth as the means to reach prosperity while neglecting the bases of every economy: care work and nature. Its focus lies solely on paid work and the market economy. By integrating (a) social and ecological ‘reproductivity’ (unpaid care and subsistence work as well as nature) and (b) democratic processes for just distribution of environmental burdens and benefits, as well as participatory equity in relevant decision making, feminist political economy and environmental justice approaches offer substantial strategies towards building humane, just and caring societies.

KW - Environmental justice

KW - Feminist economics

KW - Sustainability to come

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002078880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-016-9761-9

DO - 10.1007/s10460-016-9761-9

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85002078880

VL - 34

SP - 941

EP - 953

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Simulation of the fate of Boscalid and its transformation product 4-Chlorobenzoic acid in a vineyard-terraces catchment
  2. Contextualising coastal management and adaptation
  3. Ein Angebot, das wir nicht ausschlagen können
  4. Träume
  5. Linking Public Participation to Adaptive Management
  6. Impact and Importance of Heterocyclics in Remediation
  7. "Wer sieht was?" und "Wer berührt wen?"
  8. Das Prinzip
  9. Niche segregation in microhabitat use of three sympatric Cyrtodactylus in the Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Central Vietnam
  10. Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer
  11. Cohaerins A and B, azaphilones from the fungus Hypoxylon cohaerens, and comparison of HPLC-based metabolite profiles in Hypoxylon sect. Annulata
  12. Executive Prerogatives in the Legislative Process and Democratic Stability
  13. Von Ausschluss zu Ausschluss
  14. German Language Teaching and Learning in Tanzania
  15. Do Populists Govern Differently? The Management of the Italian M5S-League Coalition in Comparative Perspective
  16. Building with Jelly, or, Concrete as the Concretion of the Abstract
  17. Business innovation symposium "At what Price? IP-Related Thoughts on New Business Models for Space Information"
  18. Development of a cycling anger scale
  19. The current challenges of liability for loss of satellite based services
  20. Design principles for advancing higher education sustainability learning through transformative research
  21. Individuelle oder kollektive Unternehmensführung?
  22. Collective intentionality in entrepreneurship-as-practice
  23. Managerhaftung und persönliche Verantwortung