Applying European Competition Law to International Organisations – The Case of OPEC: The Case of OPEC
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research
Standard
European Yearbook of International Economic Law: 2010. ed. / Christoph Hermann; Jörg Philipp Terhechte. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer Verlag, 2010. p. 179-204 (European Yearbook of International Economic Law; Vol. 1).
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Applying European Competition Law to International Organisations – The Case of OPEC
T2 - The Case of OPEC
AU - Terhechte, Jörg
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2010, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - International economic law seeks to provide rules for international business activities. Nowadays, these activities have to be seen in the light of globalization and the emerging integration of product and service markets all around the world. Questions concerning International economic law are often delicate to handle, given the multiplicity of domestic and international rules that are potentially applicable to concrete cases. The difficulty of identifying appropriate rules and the relation of different legal regimes is, of course, a result of globalization. Complex cases often involve rules of International law (e.g. WTO provisions), rules of regional integration agreements such as NAFTA or MERCOSUR and domestic legislation. These different legal regimes can potentially collide because a guiding meta system is lacking at the moment. Is for example the supranational European competition law applicable to international organizations which might embody a cartel (e.g. to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries – OPEC)? Just this question demonstrates the problems one could have if different legal regimes collided.
AB - International economic law seeks to provide rules for international business activities. Nowadays, these activities have to be seen in the light of globalization and the emerging integration of product and service markets all around the world. Questions concerning International economic law are often delicate to handle, given the multiplicity of domestic and international rules that are potentially applicable to concrete cases. The difficulty of identifying appropriate rules and the relation of different legal regimes is, of course, a result of globalization. Complex cases often involve rules of International law (e.g. WTO provisions), rules of regional integration agreements such as NAFTA or MERCOSUR and domestic legislation. These different legal regimes can potentially collide because a guiding meta system is lacking at the moment. Is for example the supranational European competition law applicable to international organizations which might embody a cartel (e.g. to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries – OPEC)? Just this question demonstrates the problems one could have if different legal regimes collided.
KW - Law
KW - Member State
KW - Common Market
KW - Private Enforcement
KW - European Competition
KW - Sovereign Immunity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145722920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/11db397a-f6a6-3fd9-b92d-61580a75b035/
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-540-78883-6_8
DO - 10.1007/978-3-540-78883-6_8
M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies
SN - 978-3-540-78882-9
T3 - European Yearbook of International Economic Law
SP - 179
EP - 204
BT - European Yearbook of International Economic Law
A2 - Hermann, Christoph
A2 - Terhechte, Jörg Philipp
PB - Springer Verlag
CY - Berlin/Heidelberg/New York
ER -