Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 6, 983, 07.06.2017.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance
AU - Kirschke, Sabrina
AU - Newig, Jens
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 by the authors.
PY - 2017/6/7
Y1 - 2017/6/7
N2 - Governance for complex problem solving has been increasingly discussed in environmental sustainability research. Above all, researchers continuously observe that sustainability problems are complex or “wicked”, and suggest participatory models to address these problems in practice. In order to add to this debate, this study suggests a more differentiated theoretical approach to define governance for complex environmental problem solving than in previous studies. The approach consists of two vital steps: First, we operationalize complexity and define management strategies for solving environmental sustainability problems based on findings from psychology research. Second, we identify governance strategies that facilitate these management strategies. Linking those strategies suggests that the role of diverse institutions, actors, and interactions differs for five key dimensions of complexity: goals, variables, dynamics, interconnections, and informational uncertainty. The results strengthen systematic analyses of environmental sustainability problems in both theory and practice.
AB - Governance for complex problem solving has been increasingly discussed in environmental sustainability research. Above all, researchers continuously observe that sustainability problems are complex or “wicked”, and suggest participatory models to address these problems in practice. In order to add to this debate, this study suggests a more differentiated theoretical approach to define governance for complex environmental problem solving than in previous studies. The approach consists of two vital steps: First, we operationalize complexity and define management strategies for solving environmental sustainability problems based on findings from psychology research. Second, we identify governance strategies that facilitate these management strategies. Linking those strategies suggests that the role of diverse institutions, actors, and interactions differs for five key dimensions of complexity: goals, variables, dynamics, interconnections, and informational uncertainty. The results strengthen systematic analyses of environmental sustainability problems in both theory and practice.
KW - Sustainability Science
KW - complex problems
KW - complex problem solving
KW - governance
KW - Integrated Water Resources Management
KW - Water Framework Directive
KW - wicked problems
UR - http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/983
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020283177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/su9060983
DO - 10.3390/su9060983
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 9
JO - Sustainability
JF - Sustainability
SN - 2071-1050
IS - 6
M1 - 983
ER -