A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. / Mazei, Jens; Hüffmeier, Joachim; Freund, Philipp Alexander et al.
In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 141, No. 1, 01.2015, p. 85-104.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Mazei, J, Hüffmeier, J, Freund, PA, Stuhlmacher, AF, Bilke, L & Hertel, G 2015, 'A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators', Psychological Bulletin, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038184

APA

Vancouver

Mazei J, Hüffmeier J, Freund PA, Stuhlmacher AF, Bilke L, Hertel G. A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. Psychological Bulletin. 2015 Jan;141(1):85-104. doi: 10.1037/a0038184

Bibtex

@article{195c03562b8c495bb21b9b7fbd84c6da,
title = "A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators",
abstract = "This meta-analysis investigates gender differences in economic negotiation outcomes. As suggested by role congruity theory, we assume that the behaviors that increase economic negotiation outcomes are more congruent with the male as compared with the female gender role, thereby presenting challenges for women's negotiation performance and reducing their outcomes. Importantly, this main effect is predicted to be moderated by person-based, situation-based, and task-based influences that make effective negotiation behavior more congruent with the female gender role, which should in turn reduce or even reverse gender differences in negotiation outcomes. Using a multilevel modeling approach, this meta-analysis includes 123 effect sizes (overall N = 10,888, including undergraduate and graduate students as well as businesspeople). Studies were included when they enabled the calculation of an effect size reflecting gender differences in achieved economic negotiation outcomes. As predicted, men achieved better economic outcomes than women on average, but gender differences strongly depended on the context: Moderator analysis revealed that gender differences favoring men were reduced when negotiators had negotiation experience, when they received information about the bargaining range, and when they negotiated on behalf of another individual. Moreover, gender differences were reversed under conditions of the lowest predicted role incongruity for women. In conclusion, gender differences in negotiations are contextually bound and can be subject to change. Future research is needed that investigates the underlying mechanisms of new moderators revealed in the current research (e.g., experience). Implications for theoretical explanations of gender differences in negotiation outcomes, for gender inequalities in the workplace, and for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Psychology, Economic outcomes, Gender, Meta-analysis, Negotiation, Sex",
author = "Jens Mazei and Joachim H{\"u}ffmeier and Freund, {Philipp Alexander} and Stuhlmacher, {Alice F.} and Lena Bilke and Guido Hertel",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1037/a0038184",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "85--104",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators

AU - Mazei, Jens

AU - Hüffmeier, Joachim

AU - Freund, Philipp Alexander

AU - Stuhlmacher, Alice F.

AU - Bilke, Lena

AU - Hertel, Guido

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - This meta-analysis investigates gender differences in economic negotiation outcomes. As suggested by role congruity theory, we assume that the behaviors that increase economic negotiation outcomes are more congruent with the male as compared with the female gender role, thereby presenting challenges for women's negotiation performance and reducing their outcomes. Importantly, this main effect is predicted to be moderated by person-based, situation-based, and task-based influences that make effective negotiation behavior more congruent with the female gender role, which should in turn reduce or even reverse gender differences in negotiation outcomes. Using a multilevel modeling approach, this meta-analysis includes 123 effect sizes (overall N = 10,888, including undergraduate and graduate students as well as businesspeople). Studies were included when they enabled the calculation of an effect size reflecting gender differences in achieved economic negotiation outcomes. As predicted, men achieved better economic outcomes than women on average, but gender differences strongly depended on the context: Moderator analysis revealed that gender differences favoring men were reduced when negotiators had negotiation experience, when they received information about the bargaining range, and when they negotiated on behalf of another individual. Moreover, gender differences were reversed under conditions of the lowest predicted role incongruity for women. In conclusion, gender differences in negotiations are contextually bound and can be subject to change. Future research is needed that investigates the underlying mechanisms of new moderators revealed in the current research (e.g., experience). Implications for theoretical explanations of gender differences in negotiation outcomes, for gender inequalities in the workplace, and for future research are discussed.

AB - This meta-analysis investigates gender differences in economic negotiation outcomes. As suggested by role congruity theory, we assume that the behaviors that increase economic negotiation outcomes are more congruent with the male as compared with the female gender role, thereby presenting challenges for women's negotiation performance and reducing their outcomes. Importantly, this main effect is predicted to be moderated by person-based, situation-based, and task-based influences that make effective negotiation behavior more congruent with the female gender role, which should in turn reduce or even reverse gender differences in negotiation outcomes. Using a multilevel modeling approach, this meta-analysis includes 123 effect sizes (overall N = 10,888, including undergraduate and graduate students as well as businesspeople). Studies were included when they enabled the calculation of an effect size reflecting gender differences in achieved economic negotiation outcomes. As predicted, men achieved better economic outcomes than women on average, but gender differences strongly depended on the context: Moderator analysis revealed that gender differences favoring men were reduced when negotiators had negotiation experience, when they received information about the bargaining range, and when they negotiated on behalf of another individual. Moreover, gender differences were reversed under conditions of the lowest predicted role incongruity for women. In conclusion, gender differences in negotiations are contextually bound and can be subject to change. Future research is needed that investigates the underlying mechanisms of new moderators revealed in the current research (e.g., experience). Implications for theoretical explanations of gender differences in negotiation outcomes, for gender inequalities in the workplace, and for future research are discussed.

KW - Psychology

KW - Economic outcomes

KW - Gender

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Negotiation

KW - Sex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925610539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0038184

DO - 10.1037/a0038184

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 25420223

VL - 141

SP - 85

EP - 104

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 1

ER -

DOI