What do citizens in tax havens think? The EU blacklist and public opinion in Switzerland
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Journal of European Integration, 13.02.2025.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - What do citizens in tax havens think? The EU blacklist and public opinion in Switzerland
AU - Roland, Aanor
AU - Arel-Bundock, Vincent
AU - Crasnic, Loriana
AU - Römgens, Indra
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025/2/13
Y1 - 2025/2/13
N2 - Blacklisting is a widely used yet controversial instrument aimed at encouraging tax havens to alter their domestic policies, particularly in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis. International organizations such as the OECD and the EU have published tax haven blacklists, but these have been criticized for their limited effectiveness as policy tools. This paper examines the political rationale behind the EU’s blacklist, by focusing on the potential role of public opinion as a driver of policy change. Specifically, we ask whether the threat of blacklisting – through naming-and-shaming or economic sanctions – can shape public attitudes toward tax reform in low-tax jurisdictions. To do this, we conduct an original survey experiment in Switzerland, and show that both a ‘naming-and-shaming’ and an ‘economic threat’ treatment significantly increase public support for tax reform, though estimated effect sizes are modest. These results provide insight into the potential of international instruments like blacklists to mobilize public opinion in support of policy change.
AB - Blacklisting is a widely used yet controversial instrument aimed at encouraging tax havens to alter their domestic policies, particularly in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis. International organizations such as the OECD and the EU have published tax haven blacklists, but these have been criticized for their limited effectiveness as policy tools. This paper examines the political rationale behind the EU’s blacklist, by focusing on the potential role of public opinion as a driver of policy change. Specifically, we ask whether the threat of blacklisting – through naming-and-shaming or economic sanctions – can shape public attitudes toward tax reform in low-tax jurisdictions. To do this, we conduct an original survey experiment in Switzerland, and show that both a ‘naming-and-shaming’ and an ‘economic threat’ treatment significantly increase public support for tax reform, though estimated effect sizes are modest. These results provide insight into the potential of international instruments like blacklists to mobilize public opinion in support of policy change.
KW - Politics
KW - üublic opinion
KW - tax havens
KW - blacklist
KW - politicization
KW - european union
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218814896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07036337.2025.2460772
DO - 10.1080/07036337.2025.2460772
M3 - Journal articles
JO - Journal of European Integration
JF - Journal of European Integration
SN - 0703-6337
ER -