Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Visualizers versus verbalizers : Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study. / Koć-Januchta, Marta; Höffler, Tim; Thoma, Gun Brit et al.

in: Computers in Human Behavior, Jahrgang 68, 01.03.2017, S. 170-179.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Koć-Januchta M, Höffler T, Thoma GB, Prechtl H, Leutner D. Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017 Mär 1;68:170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028

Bibtex

@article{d6021e74b3a8485fadef0c41b4c4d799,
title = "Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study",
abstract = "This study was conducted in order to examine the differences between visualizers and verbalizers in the way they gaze at pictures and texts while learning. Using a collection of questionnaires, college students were classified according to their visual or verbal cognitive style and were asked to learn about two different, in terms of subject and type of knowledge, topics by means of text-picture combinations. Eye-tracking was used to investigate their gaze behavior. The results show that visualizers spent significantly more time inspecting pictures than verbalizers, while verbalizers spent more time inspecting texts. Results also suggest that both visualizers{\textquoteright} and verbalizers{\textquoteright} way of learning is active but mostly within areas providing the source of information in line with their cognitive style (pictures or text). Verbalizers tended to enter non-informative, irrelevant areas of pictures sooner than visualizers. The comparison of learning outcomes showed that the group of visualizers achieved better results than the group of verbalizers on a comprehension test.",
keywords = "Cognitive style, Eye-tracking, Multimedia learning, Verbalizer, Visualizer, Psychology",
author = "Marta Ko{\'c}-Januchta and Tim H{\"o}ffler and Thoma, {Gun Brit} and Helmut Prechtl and Detlev Leutner",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "170--179",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visualizers versus verbalizers

T2 - Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study

AU - Koć-Januchta, Marta

AU - Höffler, Tim

AU - Thoma, Gun Brit

AU - Prechtl, Helmut

AU - Leutner, Detlev

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - This study was conducted in order to examine the differences between visualizers and verbalizers in the way they gaze at pictures and texts while learning. Using a collection of questionnaires, college students were classified according to their visual or verbal cognitive style and were asked to learn about two different, in terms of subject and type of knowledge, topics by means of text-picture combinations. Eye-tracking was used to investigate their gaze behavior. The results show that visualizers spent significantly more time inspecting pictures than verbalizers, while verbalizers spent more time inspecting texts. Results also suggest that both visualizers’ and verbalizers’ way of learning is active but mostly within areas providing the source of information in line with their cognitive style (pictures or text). Verbalizers tended to enter non-informative, irrelevant areas of pictures sooner than visualizers. The comparison of learning outcomes showed that the group of visualizers achieved better results than the group of verbalizers on a comprehension test.

AB - This study was conducted in order to examine the differences between visualizers and verbalizers in the way they gaze at pictures and texts while learning. Using a collection of questionnaires, college students were classified according to their visual or verbal cognitive style and were asked to learn about two different, in terms of subject and type of knowledge, topics by means of text-picture combinations. Eye-tracking was used to investigate their gaze behavior. The results show that visualizers spent significantly more time inspecting pictures than verbalizers, while verbalizers spent more time inspecting texts. Results also suggest that both visualizers’ and verbalizers’ way of learning is active but mostly within areas providing the source of information in line with their cognitive style (pictures or text). Verbalizers tended to enter non-informative, irrelevant areas of pictures sooner than visualizers. The comparison of learning outcomes showed that the group of visualizers achieved better results than the group of verbalizers on a comprehension test.

KW - Cognitive style

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Multimedia learning

KW - Verbalizer

KW - Visualizer

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997530256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84997530256

VL - 68

SP - 170

EP - 179

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

ER -

DOI