Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Computers in Human Behavior, Jahrgang 68, 01.03.2017, S. 170-179.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Visualizers versus verbalizers
T2 - Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study
AU - Koć-Januchta, Marta
AU - Höffler, Tim
AU - Thoma, Gun Brit
AU - Prechtl, Helmut
AU - Leutner, Detlev
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - This study was conducted in order to examine the differences between visualizers and verbalizers in the way they gaze at pictures and texts while learning. Using a collection of questionnaires, college students were classified according to their visual or verbal cognitive style and were asked to learn about two different, in terms of subject and type of knowledge, topics by means of text-picture combinations. Eye-tracking was used to investigate their gaze behavior. The results show that visualizers spent significantly more time inspecting pictures than verbalizers, while verbalizers spent more time inspecting texts. Results also suggest that both visualizers’ and verbalizers’ way of learning is active but mostly within areas providing the source of information in line with their cognitive style (pictures or text). Verbalizers tended to enter non-informative, irrelevant areas of pictures sooner than visualizers. The comparison of learning outcomes showed that the group of visualizers achieved better results than the group of verbalizers on a comprehension test.
AB - This study was conducted in order to examine the differences between visualizers and verbalizers in the way they gaze at pictures and texts while learning. Using a collection of questionnaires, college students were classified according to their visual or verbal cognitive style and were asked to learn about two different, in terms of subject and type of knowledge, topics by means of text-picture combinations. Eye-tracking was used to investigate their gaze behavior. The results show that visualizers spent significantly more time inspecting pictures than verbalizers, while verbalizers spent more time inspecting texts. Results also suggest that both visualizers’ and verbalizers’ way of learning is active but mostly within areas providing the source of information in line with their cognitive style (pictures or text). Verbalizers tended to enter non-informative, irrelevant areas of pictures sooner than visualizers. The comparison of learning outcomes showed that the group of visualizers achieved better results than the group of verbalizers on a comprehension test.
KW - Cognitive style
KW - Eye-tracking
KW - Multimedia learning
KW - Verbalizer
KW - Visualizer
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997530256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028
DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84997530256
VL - 68
SP - 170
EP - 179
JO - Computers in Human Behavior
JF - Computers in Human Behavior
SN - 0747-5632
ER -