The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success: An Action Theory Approach

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success: An Action Theory Approach. / Frese, Michael.
The Psychology of Entrepreneurship . Hrsg. / J. Robert Baum; Michael Frese; Robert A. Baron . 1. Aufl. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007. S. 151-188 (The organizational frontiers series).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Frese, M 2007, The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success: An Action Theory Approach. in JR Baum, M Frese & RA Baron (Hrsg.), The Psychology of Entrepreneurship . 1. Aufl., The organizational frontiers series, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, S. 151-188. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750989

APA

Frese, M. (2007). The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success: An Action Theory Approach. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Hrsg.), The Psychology of Entrepreneurship (1. Aufl., S. 151-188). (The organizational frontiers series). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750989

Vancouver

Frese M. The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success: An Action Theory Approach. in Baum JR, Frese M, Baron RA, Hrsg., The Psychology of Entrepreneurship . 1. Aufl. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2007. S. 151-188. (The organizational frontiers series). doi: 10.4324/9781315750989

Bibtex

@inbook{961cd9968b65458e94b5241cd952786a,
title = "The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success: An Action Theory Approach",
abstract = "This chapter starts with a strong assumption: Entrepreneurs{\textquoteright} actions are important and should be a starting point for theorizing in entrepreneurship (cf. also McMullen & Shepherd, 2006). I am well aware that not all entrepreneurship theorists share this assumption. Most importantly, ecological theories have left out actions from their theories (Aldrich, 1999). This is surprising for an evolutionary approach because entrepreneurial actions are as important to entrepreneurial outcomes as sexual behavior is to procreation and, therefore, survival of genes and population of genes (Dawkins, 1976). Whether or not an organization occupies a successful niche or whether or not it introduced an innovation is the result of actions and not a purely accidental process. Starting one{\textquoteright}s business in a market niche and defending the niche is an active process and not passive adaptation. Such an active approach is slowly accepted in entrepreneurship research, as scholars take more seriously that there can be effective and non-effective actions vis-{\`a}-vis the market (McMullen & Shepherd, 2006; Sarasvathy, 2001). Most actions are geared towards the environment and take into account environmental conditions. However, the most important feature of entrepreneurial action is not that it is well adjusted to environmental conditions (this is true of behavior that reacts to environmental stimuli and is guided by the stimuli) but that it changes the environment.",
keywords = "Business psychology, Entrepreneurship",
author = "Michael Frese",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.4324/9781315750989",
language = "English",
isbn = "0-8058-5062-7",
series = "The organizational frontiers series",
publisher = "Lawrence Erlbaum Associates",
pages = "151--188",
editor = "Baum, {J. Robert} and Michael Frese and {Baron }, {Robert A. }",
booktitle = "The Psychology of Entrepreneurship",
address = "United States",
edition = "1.",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success

T2 - An Action Theory Approach

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This chapter starts with a strong assumption: Entrepreneurs’ actions are important and should be a starting point for theorizing in entrepreneurship (cf. also McMullen & Shepherd, 2006). I am well aware that not all entrepreneurship theorists share this assumption. Most importantly, ecological theories have left out actions from their theories (Aldrich, 1999). This is surprising for an evolutionary approach because entrepreneurial actions are as important to entrepreneurial outcomes as sexual behavior is to procreation and, therefore, survival of genes and population of genes (Dawkins, 1976). Whether or not an organization occupies a successful niche or whether or not it introduced an innovation is the result of actions and not a purely accidental process. Starting one’s business in a market niche and defending the niche is an active process and not passive adaptation. Such an active approach is slowly accepted in entrepreneurship research, as scholars take more seriously that there can be effective and non-effective actions vis-à-vis the market (McMullen & Shepherd, 2006; Sarasvathy, 2001). Most actions are geared towards the environment and take into account environmental conditions. However, the most important feature of entrepreneurial action is not that it is well adjusted to environmental conditions (this is true of behavior that reacts to environmental stimuli and is guided by the stimuli) but that it changes the environment.

AB - This chapter starts with a strong assumption: Entrepreneurs’ actions are important and should be a starting point for theorizing in entrepreneurship (cf. also McMullen & Shepherd, 2006). I am well aware that not all entrepreneurship theorists share this assumption. Most importantly, ecological theories have left out actions from their theories (Aldrich, 1999). This is surprising for an evolutionary approach because entrepreneurial actions are as important to entrepreneurial outcomes as sexual behavior is to procreation and, therefore, survival of genes and population of genes (Dawkins, 1976). Whether or not an organization occupies a successful niche or whether or not it introduced an innovation is the result of actions and not a purely accidental process. Starting one’s business in a market niche and defending the niche is an active process and not passive adaptation. Such an active approach is slowly accepted in entrepreneurship research, as scholars take more seriously that there can be effective and non-effective actions vis-à-vis the market (McMullen & Shepherd, 2006; Sarasvathy, 2001). Most actions are geared towards the environment and take into account environmental conditions. However, the most important feature of entrepreneurial action is not that it is well adjusted to environmental conditions (this is true of behavior that reacts to environmental stimuli and is guided by the stimuli) but that it changes the environment.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120495294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2ad11169-ca2a-32e0-a915-e10ebfec02d8/

U2 - 10.4324/9781315750989

DO - 10.4324/9781315750989

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0-8058-5062-7

SN - 9780805850628

T3 - The organizational frontiers series

SP - 151

EP - 188

BT - The Psychology of Entrepreneurship

A2 - Baum, J. Robert

A2 - Frese, Michael

A2 - Baron , Robert A.

PB - Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

CY - Mahwah

ER -

Links

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Nutzung und Einfluss von Bildschirmspielen bei Kindern
  2. Modellierung von kompetenzen im bereich der bildung
  3. Regelspiele im inklusiven Sportunterricht - Eine reflektierte Fallbeschreibung förderlicher Strukturen für den Förderschwerpunkt geistige Entwicklung - Praxisbeispiel
  4. Personalpolitik in Buchverlagen
  5. Blaupause für den globalen Klimaschutz
  6. International Trade and Firm Performance
  7. Vorbemerkung zum Spiel
  8. Arbeitgeberverhalten in der Wirtschaftskrise
  9. Konsultationseinrichtungen
  10. Youth Agency in Peacebuilding
  11. Regionalisierung der Energieversorgung und Förderung von Energiespeichern
  12. Teilhabe - Teil sein - Anteil nehmen
  13. Auswirkungen der Aufgabenverteilung in Führungsteams im Lichte organisationstheoretischer Erkenntnisse
  14. Effekte von mündlichen versus schriftlichen Antwortformaten bei der performanznahen Messung von Deutsch-als-Zweitsprache (DaZ)-Kompetenz
  15. Die Entwicklung des Kündigungsschutzes von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart (mit einer vergleichenden Darstellung)
  16. Buechtemann, Christoph F. (ed.): Employment Security and Labor Market Behavior. Interdisciplinary Approaches and International Evidence, Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, 1993.512 pp. $68.00. ISBN 0-87546-188-3.
  17. Erziehungswissenschaftliche Alternativen im Pädagogikunterricht
  18. Evaluation der Kraftfähigkeiten der oberen Extremität paralympischer Rollstuhlathleten
  19. Kirche – Diakonie – und …?: Ein spannungsreiches Verhältnis im Wandel.
  20. Evaluation of a Training Concept in Therapy of Postural Instability in Parkinson`s Disease.
  21. Die Entwicklung von Vorstellungen zu Klimawandel und Naturkatastrophen in der Öffentlichkeit - konzeptionelle und methodische Überlegungen
  22. Vom "Model Sartre" zum kollektiven Intellektuellen
  23. Michael von Hinden: Persönlichkeitsverletzungen im Internet – das anwendbare Recht, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 1999
  24. Organisationsaufstellung als Beratungskonzept für Gründerpersonen
  25. Ziele und Durchführung der Untersuchung
  26. Einblicke in die physische Geographie Niedersachsens
  27. Die Zukunft der deutschen öffentlichen Apotheken
  28. Infodemic Preparedness and COVID-19
  29. Bildungspläne im Elementarbereich. Ein Beitrag zur Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung? Eine Untersuchung im Rahmen der UN-Dekade "Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung"
  30. In Erwartung von 10 Jahren Bologna Reform an europäischen Hochschulen: Chance oder Gefahr?
  31. The Lumpiness of German Exports and Imports of Goods
  32. Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios
  33. Von der Leidenschaft, Bilder zu zeigen, die man so noch nicht gesehen hat
  34. Soumaya Mestiri im Gespräch über ihr Buch "Décoloniser le féminisme"
  35. Indirekte und moderierte Effekte von schriftlicher Rückmeldung auf Leistung und Motivation.

Presse / Medien

  1. Populäre Kultur und Medien