Performance of process-based models for simulation of grain N in crop rotations across Europe

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

  • Xiaogang Yin
  • Kurt Christian Kersebaum
  • Chris Kollas
  • Kiril Manevski
  • Sanmohan Baby
  • Nicolas Beaudoin
  • Isik Öztürk
  • Thomas Gaiser
  • Lianhai Wu
  • Munir Hoffmann
  • Monia Charfeddine
  • Tobias Conradt
  • Julie Constantin
  • Frank Ewert
  • Iñaki Garcia de Cortazar-Atauri
  • Luisa Giglio
  • Petr Hlavinka
  • Holger Hoffmann
  • Marie Launay
  • Gaëtan Louarn
  • Remy Manderscheid
  • Bruno Mary
  • Wilfried Mirschel
  • Claas Nendel
  • Taru Palosuo
  • Dominique Ripoche-Wachter
  • Reimund P. Rötter
  • Françoise Ruget
  • Behzad Sharif
  • Mirek Trnka
  • Domenico Ventrella
  • Hans Joachim Weigel
  • Jørgen E. Olesen

The accurate estimation of crop grain nitrogen (N; N in grain yield) is crucial for optimizing agricultural N management, especially in crop rotations. In the present study, 12 process-based models were applied to simulate the grain N of i) seven crops in rotations, ii) across various pedo-climatic and agro-management conditions in Europe, iii) under both continuous simulation and single year simulation, and for iv) two calibration levels, namely minimal and detailed calibration. Generally, the results showed that the accuracy of the simulations in predicting grain N increased under detailed calibration. The models performed better in predicting the grain N of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) compared to spring oat (Avena sativa L.), winter rye (Secale cereale L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.) and winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). These differences are linked to the intensity of parameterization with better parameterized crops showing lower prediction errors. The model performance was influenced by N fertilization and irrigation treatments, and a majority of the predictions were more accurate under low N and rainfed treatments. Moreover, the multi-model mean provided better predictions of grain N compared to any individual model. In regard to the Individual models, DAISY, FASSET, HERMES, MONICA and STICS are suitable for predicting grain N of the main crops in typical European crop rotations, which all performed well in both continuous simulation and single year simulation. Our results show that both the model initialization and the cover crop effects in crop rotations should be considered in order to achieve good performance of continuous simulation. Furthermore, the choice of either continuous simulation or single year simulation should be guided by the simulation objectives (e.g. grain yield, grain N content or N dynamics), the crop sequence (inclusion of legumes) and treatments (rate and type of N fertilizer) included in crop rotations and the model formalism.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftAgricultural Systems
Jahrgang154
Seiten (von - bis)63-77
Anzahl der Seiten15
ISSN0308-521X
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.06.2017

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa
  2. Reframing the technosphere
  3. Robust Decoupling Control of Contact Forces in Robotic Manipulation
  4. Creative spaces in computer science
  5. Media Review
  6. Integration of risk-oriented environmental management information systems and resource planning systems
  7. Comparison of modeling approaches based on the microstructure of thermally sprayed coatings
  8. Coupling ordination techniques and GAM to spatially predict vegetation assemblages along a climatic gradient in an ENSO-affected region of extremely high climate variability
  9. Competition between honey bees and wild bees and the role of nesting resources in a nature reserve
  10. SoilTemp: A global database of near-surface temperature
  11. Efficiency and usability of industrial laser assistance systems in composite preforming
  12. Editorial
  13. Corrigendum to ‘Likelihood‐based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels’
(Larsson R., J. Lyhagen and M. Löthgren, Econometrics Journal, 4, 2001, 109–142)
  14. Bryophytes and organic layers control uptake of airborne nitrogen in low-N environments
  15. Influence of rhizobacterial volatiles on the root system architecture and the production and allocation of biomass in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon (L.) P. Beauv
  16. Ambient Assited Energy Management
  17. Foliar Endophytic Fungal Communities Are Driven by Leaf Traits—Evidence From a Temperate Tree Diversity Experiment
  18. Productivity and size of the export market
  19. The interaction of ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior
  20. Preferences and predictors for ecologically responsible behavior of vacationers
  21. Introduction to the Psychology of Entrepreneurship
  22. Pathways for Transformatio
  23. Results from the project 'Acceptance of CO2 capture and storage
  24. Kafka pfeift auf den Ursprung des Kunstwerkes.
  25. Global assessment of the non-equilibrium theory of rangelands
  26. Understanding cultural variation in cognition one child at a time
  27. What matters for work engagement?