Is the joke on you? The impact of sexist humour and gender dynamics on interpersonal work outcomes

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Is the joke on you? The impact of sexist humour and gender dynamics on interpersonal work outcomes. / Bouckaert, Yara; Vofrei, Louisa; Jonczyk, Nina et al.
in: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Jahrgang 34, Nr. 1, 01.2025, S. 144-159.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bouckaert Y, Vofrei L, Jonczyk N, Mertens A, Soliman M, Venz L et al. Is the joke on you? The impact of sexist humour and gender dynamics on interpersonal work outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2025 Jan;34(1):144-159. Epub 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2024.2429850

Bibtex

@article{d9d95244a8ab457d8b72badc59e64870,
title = "Is the joke on you? The impact of sexist humour and gender dynamics on interpersonal work outcomes",
abstract = "(Workplace) humour can have positive effects on interpersonal (workplace) relationships. However, sexist humour–a form of subtle discrimination that communicates disparagement or degradation at the expense of (mainly) women in a humorous manner–might be highly detrimental in various ways. Despite sexist humour being pervasive in the workplace, little is known about when, how, and why sexist humour impacts the recipients and their work relationship with the initiator. With two pre-registered studies, theoretically based on affective events theory and social identity theory, this research advances knowledge on the interpersonal effects and gender dynamics of sexist humour at work. In the experimental Study 1, 255 participants rated an actor telling a (non-)sexist joke. In the field Study 2, 170 participants recalled a (non-)sexist humour event they encountered at work. Both studies produced converging results: Recipients of sexist humour were less willing to collaborate with the humour initiator and perceived them as less competent; this was psychologically explained by elevated negative affect. These detrimental effects particularly emerged when a man (vs. woman) initiated sexist humour toward a woman (vs. man).",
keywords = "gender, interpersonal work relationships, negative affect, Sexist workplace humour, Management studies",
author = "Yara Bouckaert and Louisa Vofrei and Nina Jonczyk and Annika Mertens and Meikel Soliman and Laura Venz and Loschelder, {David D.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2025",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1080/1359432X.2024.2429850",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "144--159",
journal = "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology",
issn = "1359-432X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the joke on you? The impact of sexist humour and gender dynamics on interpersonal work outcomes

AU - Bouckaert, Yara

AU - Vofrei, Louisa

AU - Jonczyk, Nina

AU - Mertens, Annika

AU - Soliman, Meikel

AU - Venz, Laura

AU - Loschelder, David D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2025/1

Y1 - 2025/1

N2 - (Workplace) humour can have positive effects on interpersonal (workplace) relationships. However, sexist humour–a form of subtle discrimination that communicates disparagement or degradation at the expense of (mainly) women in a humorous manner–might be highly detrimental in various ways. Despite sexist humour being pervasive in the workplace, little is known about when, how, and why sexist humour impacts the recipients and their work relationship with the initiator. With two pre-registered studies, theoretically based on affective events theory and social identity theory, this research advances knowledge on the interpersonal effects and gender dynamics of sexist humour at work. In the experimental Study 1, 255 participants rated an actor telling a (non-)sexist joke. In the field Study 2, 170 participants recalled a (non-)sexist humour event they encountered at work. Both studies produced converging results: Recipients of sexist humour were less willing to collaborate with the humour initiator and perceived them as less competent; this was psychologically explained by elevated negative affect. These detrimental effects particularly emerged when a man (vs. woman) initiated sexist humour toward a woman (vs. man).

AB - (Workplace) humour can have positive effects on interpersonal (workplace) relationships. However, sexist humour–a form of subtle discrimination that communicates disparagement or degradation at the expense of (mainly) women in a humorous manner–might be highly detrimental in various ways. Despite sexist humour being pervasive in the workplace, little is known about when, how, and why sexist humour impacts the recipients and their work relationship with the initiator. With two pre-registered studies, theoretically based on affective events theory and social identity theory, this research advances knowledge on the interpersonal effects and gender dynamics of sexist humour at work. In the experimental Study 1, 255 participants rated an actor telling a (non-)sexist joke. In the field Study 2, 170 participants recalled a (non-)sexist humour event they encountered at work. Both studies produced converging results: Recipients of sexist humour were less willing to collaborate with the humour initiator and perceived them as less competent; this was psychologically explained by elevated negative affect. These detrimental effects particularly emerged when a man (vs. woman) initiated sexist humour toward a woman (vs. man).

KW - gender

KW - interpersonal work relationships

KW - negative affect

KW - Sexist workplace humour

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209997765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1359432X.2024.2429850

DO - 10.1080/1359432X.2024.2429850

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85209997765

VL - 34

SP - 144

EP - 159

JO - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

JF - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

SN - 1359-432X

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Engaging citizens in sustainability research
  2. Gesundheitsförderung und Schule
  3. Yemen's Solar Revolution
  4. Ansätze zu einer komparatistischen Kinder- und Jugendliteraturforschung
  5. Archival research on sustainability-related executive compensation.
  6. Räume der Beobachtung von Kindern
  7. Verkehrswissenschaftliche Arbeiten 12
  8. Das Drama im Leben der Institutionen
  9. Evaluation of a Training Concept in Therapy of Postural Instability in Parkinson`s Disease.
  10. Ein Kontingenzansatz zu Planung und Erfolg von Kleinunternehmen
  11. Deutsch Englisch Schülerleistungen International (DESI)
  12. From the Household of the Soul to the Economy of Money
  13. Rezension zu: Otto, Hans-Uwe / Polutta, Andreas / Ziegler, Holger (Hg.): Evidence-based Practice – Modernising the Knowledge Base of Social Work?. Opladen: Barbara Budrich 2009
  14. Transdisciplinarity
  15. Stützlehrer als neuer pädagogischer Profi in der Beruflichen Bildung.
  16. Artikel 26 EUV [Ziele und allgemeine Leitlinien]
  17. Einfluss kontrollierten Brennens auf die Nährstoffdynamik von Sand- und Moorheiden
  18. Gender-Aspekte bei der Einführung und Akkreditierung gestufter Studiengänge
  19. Sammelrezension: Ökonomien des Sozialen im Web 2.0
  20. Die Kunstreligion
  21. The Animal 'Other' in J.M. Coetzee's "Disgrace" and "The Lives of Animals"
  22. Entrepreneurship-Education
  23. Wasted money, wasted time?
  24. Biografie und Lebenswelt von Jungarbeitern.
  25. § 8 Strafrechtliche und strafprozessuale Prinzipien
  26. Artikel 43 EUV [Missionen der GSVPl]
  27. Praxisphasen im Lehramtsstudium mit Schwerpunkt auf der Einbindung neu zugewanderter Schülerinnen und Schüler
  28. Verbundvorteile für den Börsengang der Deutschen Bahn ausreichend berücksichtigt?
  29. Die unbewusste Karte des Gemüts
  30. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Gene Therapy
  31. Wettbewerbsrecht, Deutschland
  32. Arbeitsschutz in der ambulanten Pflege
  33. Führung von Silver Workern
  34. Jugendliche im Web 2.0: Risiken und Chancen
  35. Hospizdienste und palliative Pflege
  36. Einfachheit im (kinder)literaturtheoretischen Diskurs