Dimensional models for the perception of rectangles

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Dimensional models for the perception of rectangles. / Borg, Ingwer; Leutner, Detlev.
in: Perception & Psychophysics, Jahrgang 34, Nr. 3, 01.05.1983, S. 257-267.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Borg I, Leutner D. Dimensional models for the perception of rectangles. Perception & Psychophysics. 1983 Mai 1;34(3):257-267. doi: 10.3758/BF03202954

Bibtex

@article{46244b34c24548b097f5c358f5ac6d00,
title = "Dimensional models for the perception of rectangles",
abstract = "Krantz and Tversky (1975), Takane (1981), Wender (1971), and others have suggested that it is impossible to explain similarity judgments for rectangles by a simple dimensional model of the Minkowski distance type, because the psychologically compelling dimensions are not independent and interact. For reasons never made explicit, the relevant dimensions were assumed to be area and shape, rather than width and height. Reanalyses show, however, that the latter dimensions, appropriately scaled, eliminate interaction effects. To test these conclusions empirically, an experiment was carried out with two sets of rectangles. Each set was a complete 4×4 design, one in width × height coordinates, and one in area × shape coordinates. For each stimulus set, 21 subjects judged the dissimilarities of all pairs of rectangles twice. All subjects were reliable. Apart from one extreme subject in each group, all data lead to very similar MDS solutions. These solutions correspond closely to the predictions, that is, they can be well approximated with physical width and height coordinates rescaled such that the units decrease increasingly as one moves away from the origin. No interaction effects are found, but some indications for a more complicated composition rule are observed. {\textcopyright} 1983 Psychonomic Society, Inc.",
keywords = "Psychology, Form Perception, Humans, Judgment, Models, Psychological",
author = "Ingwer Borg and Detlev Leutner",
note = "This work was supported by Grant Bo S97/S from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG.",
year = "1983",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03202954",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "257--267",
journal = "Perception & Psychophysics",
issn = "0031-5117",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dimensional models for the perception of rectangles

AU - Borg, Ingwer

AU - Leutner, Detlev

N1 - This work was supported by Grant Bo S97/S from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG.

PY - 1983/5/1

Y1 - 1983/5/1

N2 - Krantz and Tversky (1975), Takane (1981), Wender (1971), and others have suggested that it is impossible to explain similarity judgments for rectangles by a simple dimensional model of the Minkowski distance type, because the psychologically compelling dimensions are not independent and interact. For reasons never made explicit, the relevant dimensions were assumed to be area and shape, rather than width and height. Reanalyses show, however, that the latter dimensions, appropriately scaled, eliminate interaction effects. To test these conclusions empirically, an experiment was carried out with two sets of rectangles. Each set was a complete 4×4 design, one in width × height coordinates, and one in area × shape coordinates. For each stimulus set, 21 subjects judged the dissimilarities of all pairs of rectangles twice. All subjects were reliable. Apart from one extreme subject in each group, all data lead to very similar MDS solutions. These solutions correspond closely to the predictions, that is, they can be well approximated with physical width and height coordinates rescaled such that the units decrease increasingly as one moves away from the origin. No interaction effects are found, but some indications for a more complicated composition rule are observed. © 1983 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

AB - Krantz and Tversky (1975), Takane (1981), Wender (1971), and others have suggested that it is impossible to explain similarity judgments for rectangles by a simple dimensional model of the Minkowski distance type, because the psychologically compelling dimensions are not independent and interact. For reasons never made explicit, the relevant dimensions were assumed to be area and shape, rather than width and height. Reanalyses show, however, that the latter dimensions, appropriately scaled, eliminate interaction effects. To test these conclusions empirically, an experiment was carried out with two sets of rectangles. Each set was a complete 4×4 design, one in width × height coordinates, and one in area × shape coordinates. For each stimulus set, 21 subjects judged the dissimilarities of all pairs of rectangles twice. All subjects were reliable. Apart from one extreme subject in each group, all data lead to very similar MDS solutions. These solutions correspond closely to the predictions, that is, they can be well approximated with physical width and height coordinates rescaled such that the units decrease increasingly as one moves away from the origin. No interaction effects are found, but some indications for a more complicated composition rule are observed. © 1983 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

KW - Psychology

KW - Form Perception

KW - Humans

KW - Judgment

KW - Models, Psychological

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020818685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a66bb8ff-25fa-30f8-8ea8-e2b0a0827217/

U2 - 10.3758/BF03202954

DO - 10.3758/BF03202954

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 6646968

AN - SCOPUS:0020818685

VL - 34

SP - 257

EP - 267

JO - Perception & Psychophysics

JF - Perception & Psychophysics

SN - 0031-5117

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Influence of 8-weeks of supervised static stretching or resistance training of pectoral major muscles on maximal strength, muscle thickness and range of motion
  2. Inquiry-learning
  3. Double perspective taking processes of primary children - adoption and application of a psychological instrument
  4. Heterogeneity and Diversity
  5. Sitzen in den Übergängen oder Richtlinien quo vadis?
  6. An Imperfect Union?
  7. Elektroaltgeräte
  8. A Elbphilharmonie em discussão: vozes críticas desde Hamburgo. Um breve insight sobre o atual debate local
  9. Paradoxe Kritik
  10. How to Integrate Refugees Into the Workforce - Different Opportunities for (Social) Entrepreneurship
  11. European and national law in history and future
  12. Rainfall and temperature variation does not explain arid species diversity in outback Australia
  13. Decision Support System
  14. Cadavre Exquisit
  15. Between the Front Lines
  16. Totgesagte leben länger
  17. Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerkooperation an Gemeinschaftsschulen
  18. Tourist perceptions of summer weather in Scandinavia
  19. Freie Pizzawahl für Informatiker und Wirtschaftsinformatiker
  20. Are web-based stress management interventions effective as an indirect treatment for depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials
  21. "Sorry Miss, I completely forgot about it"
  22. Orienting Orientalism, or How to Map Cyberspace
  23. Prototypische Lehr-Lern-Bausteine
  24. Perspective as Practice. Renaissance Cultures of Optics, (About the development of optics and perspective between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries) (TECHNE 1) Dupré, Sven (ed.): Brepols, Turnhout 2019