Influence of 8-weeks of supervised static stretching or resistance training of pectoral major muscles on maximal strength, muscle thickness and range of motion

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Tim Wohlann
  • Konstantin Warneke
  • Vincent Kalder
  • David G. Behm
  • Tobias Schmidt
  • Stephan Schiemann

Objectives: Current research suggests static stretch-induced maximal strength increases and muscle hypertrophy with potential to substitute resistance-training routines. However, most studies investigated the plantar flexors. This study explored the effects of a static stretching program on maximal strength, hypertrophy and flexibility of the pectoralis major and compared the effects with those of traditional resistance training. Methods: Eighty-one (81) active participants were allocated to either a static stretching, strength-training or control group. Pectoralis stretching was applied 15 min/day, 4 days per week for 8 weeks, while resistance training trained 3 days per week, 5 × 12 repetitions. Results: There was an increase in all parameters (strength: p < 0.001, ƞ 2 = 0.313, muscle thickness: p < 0.001, ƞ 2 = 0.157–0.264, flexibility: p < 0.001, ƞ 2 = 0.316) and a time*group interaction (strength: p = 0.001, ƞ 2 = 0.154, muscle thickness: p = 0.008–0.001, ƞ 2 = 0.117–0.173, flexibility: p < 0.001, ƞ 2 = 0.267). Post-hoc testing showed no difference between both intervention groups regarding maximal strength and muscle thickness (p = 0.905–0.983, d = 0.036–0.087), while flexibility increased in the stretching group (p = 0.001, d = 0.789). Conclusion: Stretching showed increases in maximal strength and hypertrophy, which were comparable with commonly used resistance training. Based on current literature, the influence of mechanical tension as the underlying mechanism is discussed. Furthermore, as equipment and comparatively long stretching durations are requested to induce meaningful strength increases in recreationally active participants, practical application seems limited to special circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume124
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1885-1893
Number of pages9
ISSN1439-6319
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 06.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. To separate or not to separate: what is necessary and enough for a green and sustainable extraction of bioactive compounds from Brazilian citrus waste
  2. For Whom Does It Work? Moderators of Outcome on the Effect of a Transdiagnostic Internet-Based Maintenance Treatment After Inpatient Psychotherapy
  3. The impact of digital innovation on path-dependent decision-making
  4. Der Sandbox Innovation Process: Wie Vielfalt in Open-Innovation-Communities genutzt werden
  5. Mathematische Modellierung eines Raumes zur Nutzung in einem dynamischen Cyber-Physischen System
  6. Decentering the argumentative turn
  7. Numerical investigation of laser beam-welded AA2198 joints under different artificial ageing conditions
  8. Legal Parameters of Space Tourism
  9. A milp for installation scheduling of offshore wind farms
  10. Das Schreiben, das Interpretieren, die Tatsachen
  11. Notting Hill Gate 4 Basic
  12. The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves
  13. Bimodal Enterprise Architecture Management
  14. Investigation of the dynamic grain structure evolution during hot extrusion of En AW-6082
  15. A short review on diffusion coefficients in magnesium alloys and related applications
  16. Biblical texts and theologizing with children
  17. Sustainable Redevelopment of Real Estate Properties and Its Social Impact
  18. Definitions and Measures of Party Institutionalization in New Personal Politics
  19. Bist du high, bist du dabei!
  20. Joh 20,30f.
  21. Joint production and responsibility in ecological economics
  22. Das digitale Bild gibt es nicht