Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects. / Jahn, Stephanie; Newig, Jens; Lang, Daniel J. et al.
in: Sustainable Development, Jahrgang 30, Nr. 2, 01.04.2022, S. 343-357.Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects
AU - Jahn, Stephanie
AU - Newig, Jens
AU - Lang, Daniel J.
AU - Kahle, Judith
AU - Bergmann, Matthias
N1 - Special Issue:Academics for sustainable development; exploring consequences and dilemmas of transdisciplinary research approaches
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - The discourse revolving around “new modes of knowledge production”—particularly in sustainability-oriented research—seems to suggest a duality of transdisciplinary versus non-transdisciplinary research. Yet, in reality, a spectrum of transdisciplinary research modes may be expected. This article offers an empirically grounded distinction of five research modes, based on a cluster analysis of 59 completed sustainability-oriented research projects. Projects in one cluster approximate a transdisciplinary ideal type, while another cluster combines almost purely practice-oriented projects. Among the three remaining clusters with varying degrees of practitioner interaction, one cluster assembles projects with strictly academic research, while realizing substantial societal impact. Furthermore, our analyses indicate that the choice of research mode strongly depends on the funding context, with mission-oriented funding encouraging more collaborative modes. Overall, clusters with more practitioner interaction display stronger societal outputs and impacts at the cost of academic outputs and impacts. Beyond the demarcation of transdisciplinary research modes in sustainability science, our empirical analysis revealed three important tensions related to the theory and practice of this research approach: the duality of science and society (and scholars and practitioners); imbalances in the involvement and influence of different societal actor groups; and tensions between societal and academic outputs and impacts.
AB - The discourse revolving around “new modes of knowledge production”—particularly in sustainability-oriented research—seems to suggest a duality of transdisciplinary versus non-transdisciplinary research. Yet, in reality, a spectrum of transdisciplinary research modes may be expected. This article offers an empirically grounded distinction of five research modes, based on a cluster analysis of 59 completed sustainability-oriented research projects. Projects in one cluster approximate a transdisciplinary ideal type, while another cluster combines almost purely practice-oriented projects. Among the three remaining clusters with varying degrees of practitioner interaction, one cluster assembles projects with strictly academic research, while realizing substantial societal impact. Furthermore, our analyses indicate that the choice of research mode strongly depends on the funding context, with mission-oriented funding encouraging more collaborative modes. Overall, clusters with more practitioner interaction display stronger societal outputs and impacts at the cost of academic outputs and impacts. Beyond the demarcation of transdisciplinary research modes in sustainability science, our empirical analysis revealed three important tensions related to the theory and practice of this research approach: the duality of science and society (and scholars and practitioners); imbalances in the involvement and influence of different societal actor groups; and tensions between societal and academic outputs and impacts.
KW - modes of research
KW - research evaluation
KW - societal impact
KW - transdisciplinarity
KW - Transdisciplinary studies
KW - Sustainability Governance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120048785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/97ff1ccd-ef6a-33b9-a70a-99c9d346ed05/
U2 - 10.1002/sd.2278
DO - 10.1002/sd.2278
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85120048785
VL - 30
SP - 343
EP - 357
JO - Sustainable Development
JF - Sustainable Development
SN - 0968-0802
IS - 2
ER -