Cost-effective Biodiversity Conservation: Procurement Auctions and Payment-by-Results

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Cost-effective Biodiversity Conservation: Procurement Auctions and Payment-by-Results. / Groth, Markus.
in: EuroChoices, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 2, 04.08.2011, S. 32-37.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d1e7cf9b51cf4f3087122081a481a783,
title = "Cost-effective Biodiversity Conservation: Procurement Auctions and Payment-by-Results",
abstract = "Managed grasslands contribute in a number of ways to the biodiversity of European agricultural landscapes and provide a wide range of ecosystem services that are also of socio‐economic value. Against the background of a rapid biodiversity loss in agricultural landscapes, increasing attention is being paid to farming practices that enhance ecosystem services. Therefore developing cost‐effective conservation payment schemes is the main challenge facing present European agri‐environmental policy. This article deals with the design, implementation and results of a case‐study payment scheme in Steinburg county in Germany that compares payment‐by‐results conservation procurement auctions with a fixed flat‐rate payment‐by‐results approach as a means of improving the cost‐effectiveness of conservation schemes for grassland plant biodiversity. The empirical work indicates cost‐effectiveness gains of auctioning – compared to current fixed flat‐rate payment schemes – of up to 50 per cent. These findings along with the relatively high number of successful participants indicate that this specific approach will probably be an improvement over current action‐orientated fixed flat‐rate payments. This is mainly because low‐cost producers gain smaller information rents and the conservation agency will – with a given budget – be able to close contracts with (some) high‐cost farmers due to cost‐effectiveness gains provided by low‐cost landowners.",
keywords = "Economics",
author = "Markus Groth",
year = "2011",
month = aug,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1746-692X.2011.00190.x",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "32--37",
journal = "EuroChoices",
issn = "1478-0917",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effective Biodiversity Conservation

T2 - Procurement Auctions and Payment-by-Results

AU - Groth, Markus

PY - 2011/8/4

Y1 - 2011/8/4

N2 - Managed grasslands contribute in a number of ways to the biodiversity of European agricultural landscapes and provide a wide range of ecosystem services that are also of socio‐economic value. Against the background of a rapid biodiversity loss in agricultural landscapes, increasing attention is being paid to farming practices that enhance ecosystem services. Therefore developing cost‐effective conservation payment schemes is the main challenge facing present European agri‐environmental policy. This article deals with the design, implementation and results of a case‐study payment scheme in Steinburg county in Germany that compares payment‐by‐results conservation procurement auctions with a fixed flat‐rate payment‐by‐results approach as a means of improving the cost‐effectiveness of conservation schemes for grassland plant biodiversity. The empirical work indicates cost‐effectiveness gains of auctioning – compared to current fixed flat‐rate payment schemes – of up to 50 per cent. These findings along with the relatively high number of successful participants indicate that this specific approach will probably be an improvement over current action‐orientated fixed flat‐rate payments. This is mainly because low‐cost producers gain smaller information rents and the conservation agency will – with a given budget – be able to close contracts with (some) high‐cost farmers due to cost‐effectiveness gains provided by low‐cost landowners.

AB - Managed grasslands contribute in a number of ways to the biodiversity of European agricultural landscapes and provide a wide range of ecosystem services that are also of socio‐economic value. Against the background of a rapid biodiversity loss in agricultural landscapes, increasing attention is being paid to farming practices that enhance ecosystem services. Therefore developing cost‐effective conservation payment schemes is the main challenge facing present European agri‐environmental policy. This article deals with the design, implementation and results of a case‐study payment scheme in Steinburg county in Germany that compares payment‐by‐results conservation procurement auctions with a fixed flat‐rate payment‐by‐results approach as a means of improving the cost‐effectiveness of conservation schemes for grassland plant biodiversity. The empirical work indicates cost‐effectiveness gains of auctioning – compared to current fixed flat‐rate payment schemes – of up to 50 per cent. These findings along with the relatively high number of successful participants indicate that this specific approach will probably be an improvement over current action‐orientated fixed flat‐rate payments. This is mainly because low‐cost producers gain smaller information rents and the conservation agency will – with a given budget – be able to close contracts with (some) high‐cost farmers due to cost‐effectiveness gains provided by low‐cost landowners.

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961093806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2011.00190.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2011.00190.x

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 10

SP - 32

EP - 37

JO - EuroChoices

JF - EuroChoices

SN - 1478-0917

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Kompetenzentwicklung von Lehramtsstudierenden in verlängerten Praxisphasen
  2. Active Cityship in the planning process for the future plan "More Altona"
  3. The Influence of Personality on Students‘ Career Decisiveness – A Comparison between Chinese and German Economics and Management Student
  4. Sprechsport
  5. Das Wesen totaler Herrschaft
  6. Consequence evaluations and moral concerns about climate change
  7. Remote sensing of bush encroachment on commercial cattle farms in semi-arid rangelands in Namibia
  8. Edutainment in sustainability
  9. Microeconomic Consequences of Exemptions from Value Added Taxation – The Case of Deutsche Post
  10. Wirtschaftsrecht an Fachhochschulen
  11. Are the Rural Electrification Efforts in the Ecuadorian Amazon Sustainable?
  12. Spin-off Gründungen in der Wohlfahrtspflege
  13. Long-term stream invertebrate community alterations induced by the insecticide thiacloprid
  14. Kybernetische Biopolitik
  15. Teacher’s ethnic teasing
  16. Energiekrise, Finanzkrise, Klimakrise
  17. The Sustainability Balanced Scorcard and venture capital ownership
  18. Kindertheologie und schulische Alltagspraxis
  19. Jesus Christus
  20. Greek cities in crisis
  21. Zukunftsprojekte finanzieren
  22. Konzept zur Neuabgrenzung und Ausweitung des Naturparks Lüneburger Heide
  23. Transdisziplinäre Forschung
  24. White-Indian Relations
  25. The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity—Methods and Policy Applications, Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, Peter Nijkamp, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2003), 165 pp., ISBN: 1-84376 270-6
  26. Mit psychischer Gesundheit zur guten Ganztagsschule
  27. Interdisciplinary Review of Medium-deep Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage in North Germany
  28. Über Hinterbühnen und Fauxpas
  29. § 844 Ersatzansprüche Dritter bei Tötung