Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Computers in Human Behavior, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 2, 01.03.2003, S. 221-243.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities
AU - Plass, Jan L.
AU - Chun, Dorothy M.
AU - Mayer, Richard E.
AU - Leutner, Detlev
PY - 2003/3/1
Y1 - 2003/3/1
N2 - When do multiple representations of information in second-language learning help and when do they hinder learning? English-speaking college students (N = 152), enrolled in a second-year German course, read a 762-word German story presented by a multimedia computer program. Students received no annotations, verbal annotations, visual annotations, or both for 35 key words in the story. Recall of word translations was worse for low-verbal and low-spatial ability students than for high-verbal and high-spatial ability students, respectively, when they received visual annotations for vocabulary words, but did not differ when they received verbal annotations. Text comprehension was worst for all learners when they received visual annotations. Results are consistent with a generative theory of multimedia learning and with cognitive load theory which assume that multimedia learning processes are executed under the constraints of limited working memory.
AB - When do multiple representations of information in second-language learning help and when do they hinder learning? English-speaking college students (N = 152), enrolled in a second-year German course, read a 762-word German story presented by a multimedia computer program. Students received no annotations, verbal annotations, visual annotations, or both for 35 key words in the story. Recall of word translations was worse for low-verbal and low-spatial ability students than for high-verbal and high-spatial ability students, respectively, when they received visual annotations for vocabulary words, but did not differ when they received verbal annotations. Text comprehension was worst for all learners when they received visual annotations. Results are consistent with a generative theory of multimedia learning and with cognitive load theory which assume that multimedia learning processes are executed under the constraints of limited working memory.
KW - Cognitive load
KW - Individual differences
KW - Multimedia learning
KW - Second language acquisition
KW - Spatial ability
KW - Verbal ability
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037352947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8
DO - 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:0037352947
VL - 19
SP - 221
EP - 243
JO - Computers in Human Behavior
JF - Computers in Human Behavior
SN - 0747-5632
IS - 2
ER -