Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system: A systematic review

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system: A systematic review. / Miller, Thomas; Reihlen, Markus.
in: Patient Education and Counseling, Jahrgang 110, 107652, 01.05.2023.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{96f2681a55424118af966059d026562b,
title = "Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Patient involvement has become an important and lively field of research, yet existing findings are fragmented and often contested. Without a synthesis of the research field, these findings are of limited use to scholars, healthcare providers, or policy-makers. Objective: Examine the body of knowledge on patient involvement to determine what is known, contested, and unknown about benefits, risks, and effective implementation strategies. Patient Involvement: Patients were not involved. Methods: Systematic literature review of 99 journal articles using a conceptual model integrating three levels: health systems, health providers, and patients. We extracted individual research findings and organized them into the structure of our model to provide a holistic picture of patient involvement. Results: The review highlights overlaps and conflicts between various patient involvement approaches. Our results show benefits for individual patients and the health system as a whole. At the provider level, however, we identified clear barriers to patient involvement. Discussion: Patient involvement requires collaboration among health systems, healthcare providers, and patients. We showed that increasing patient responsibility and health literacy requires policy-maker interventions. This includes incentives for patient education by providers, adapting medical education curricula, and building a database of reliable health information and decision support for patients. Furthermore, policies supporting a common infrastructure for digital health data and managed patient data exchange will foster provider collaboration. Practical Value: Our review shows how an approach integrating health systems, healthcare providers, and patients can make patient involvement more effective than isolated interventions. Such systematic patient involvement is likely to improve population health literacy and healthcare quality.",
keywords = "Patient autonomy, Patient involvement, Patient-centered care, Shared decision making, Healthcare strategy, Management studies",
author = "Thomas Miller and Markus Reihlen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2023",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2023.107652",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Miller, Thomas

AU - Reihlen, Markus

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2023/5/1

Y1 - 2023/5/1

N2 - Background: Patient involvement has become an important and lively field of research, yet existing findings are fragmented and often contested. Without a synthesis of the research field, these findings are of limited use to scholars, healthcare providers, or policy-makers. Objective: Examine the body of knowledge on patient involvement to determine what is known, contested, and unknown about benefits, risks, and effective implementation strategies. Patient Involvement: Patients were not involved. Methods: Systematic literature review of 99 journal articles using a conceptual model integrating three levels: health systems, health providers, and patients. We extracted individual research findings and organized them into the structure of our model to provide a holistic picture of patient involvement. Results: The review highlights overlaps and conflicts between various patient involvement approaches. Our results show benefits for individual patients and the health system as a whole. At the provider level, however, we identified clear barriers to patient involvement. Discussion: Patient involvement requires collaboration among health systems, healthcare providers, and patients. We showed that increasing patient responsibility and health literacy requires policy-maker interventions. This includes incentives for patient education by providers, adapting medical education curricula, and building a database of reliable health information and decision support for patients. Furthermore, policies supporting a common infrastructure for digital health data and managed patient data exchange will foster provider collaboration. Practical Value: Our review shows how an approach integrating health systems, healthcare providers, and patients can make patient involvement more effective than isolated interventions. Such systematic patient involvement is likely to improve population health literacy and healthcare quality.

AB - Background: Patient involvement has become an important and lively field of research, yet existing findings are fragmented and often contested. Without a synthesis of the research field, these findings are of limited use to scholars, healthcare providers, or policy-makers. Objective: Examine the body of knowledge on patient involvement to determine what is known, contested, and unknown about benefits, risks, and effective implementation strategies. Patient Involvement: Patients were not involved. Methods: Systematic literature review of 99 journal articles using a conceptual model integrating three levels: health systems, health providers, and patients. We extracted individual research findings and organized them into the structure of our model to provide a holistic picture of patient involvement. Results: The review highlights overlaps and conflicts between various patient involvement approaches. Our results show benefits for individual patients and the health system as a whole. At the provider level, however, we identified clear barriers to patient involvement. Discussion: Patient involvement requires collaboration among health systems, healthcare providers, and patients. We showed that increasing patient responsibility and health literacy requires policy-maker interventions. This includes incentives for patient education by providers, adapting medical education curricula, and building a database of reliable health information and decision support for patients. Furthermore, policies supporting a common infrastructure for digital health data and managed patient data exchange will foster provider collaboration. Practical Value: Our review shows how an approach integrating health systems, healthcare providers, and patients can make patient involvement more effective than isolated interventions. Such systematic patient involvement is likely to improve population health literacy and healthcare quality.

KW - Patient autonomy

KW - Patient involvement

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Shared decision making

KW - Healthcare strategy

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147927705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e591806d-1d2a-320c-8923-db5e6a0e3a49/

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107652

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107652

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 36804578

VL - 110

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

M1 - 107652

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Trumps Klimapolitik
  2. Das neue Vollstreckungshilferecht im Bereich der freiheitsentziehenden Sanktionen innerhalb der EU
  3. Temporäre Nutzungen urbaner Brachflächen
  4. Terrorismus im Film der 70er Jahre
  5. Temporal trends of polyfluoroalkyl compounds in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) from the German Bight, 1999-2008
  6. Zukunft der Familie
  7. I’m so sorry
  8. Leuphana Sommerakademie
  9. Lebenslanges Lernen als Erziehungswissenschaft
  10. Die Kehrseite der Medaille. Popkultur und «Subversion» im Kontext der Neuen Rechten
  11. Globalisation Gangnam-style
  12. A CULTure of entrepreneurship education
  13. Strategische Prozesse und Persistenzen
  14. Forschungsförderung unter dem Aspekt transdisziplinärer Integrationsaufgaben
  15. Coaching-Kristallmodell – Coaching Tool Collection mit Materialien
  16. VwGO §44a [Rechtsbehelfe gegen behördliche Verfahrenshandlungen]
  17. Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien
  18. Sozialpsychologie der Gruppe
  19. Inklusionsorientierte Lehrkräftebildung an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg - Entwicklung und Implementation von Basisqualifikation und Profilstudium
  20. Asia Pacific Perspectives on Accounting for Sustainability: An Introduction
  21. Internationales Kartell- und Fusionskontrollverfahrensrecht
  22. Sustainable Finance
  23. Relative Autonomie und relative Heteronomie
  24. Einfluss einer trainingsbegleitenden sensomotorischen Intervention auf die sensomotorische Gleichgewichtsregulation
  25. Bindung in familiarer und öffentlicher Erziehung
  26. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen des Verhältnisses von Eltern, Schule und Jugendhilfe
  27. Das standardessentielle Patent und die FRAND-Lizenz Teil 1
  28. Fahndungssendungen im deutschsprachigen Fernsehen
  29. Fashion consumption during COVID-19
  30. Francesca Ferrando (2019): Philosophical Posthumanism. Theory in the New Humanities, Series Editor: Rosi Braidotti, Preface by Rosi Braidotti). Bloomsbury Academic (27 June, 2019), 296 pages, ISBN:1350059501, ISBN: 9781350059504
  31. Circular Supply Chain Management in the Wind Energy Industry - A Systematic Literature Review
  32. N-Umsatz und Spurengasemissionen typischer Biomassefruchtfolgen zur Biogaserzeugung in Norddeutschland