Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods

Melanie C. M. Ehren; Marcus Pietsch

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3

Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review

Standard

Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods. / Ehren, Melanie C. M.; Pietsch, Marcus.
Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections. ed. / Melanie C. M. Ehren. Cham: Springer Verlag, 2016. p. 47-66 (Accountability and Educational Improvement).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Ehren, MCM & Pietsch, M 2016, Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods. in MCM Ehren (ed.), Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections. Accountability and Educational Improvement, Springer Verlag, Cham, pp. 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3

APA

Ehren, M. C. M., & Pietsch, M. (2016). Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods. In M. C. M. Ehren (Ed.), Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections (pp. 47-66). (Accountability and Educational Improvement). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3

Vancouver

Ehren MCM, Pietsch M. Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods. In Ehren MCM, editor, Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections. Cham: Springer Verlag. 2016. p. 47-66. (Accountability and Educational Improvement). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3

Bibtex

@inbook{1ebd0d7c23464fd3bbb80f961c0ee7d1,

title = "Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods",

abstract = "This chapter explores the issues of reliability and validity of inspection frameworks and methods, and challenges and tensions in inspection frameworks and methods. Validity is an important aspect of thinking about effective inspection system as invalid inspection systems may lead to flawed judgments which will misguide administrative interventions and policy decisions and which are likely to have a negative impact on schools and teachers. We will introduce Kane{\textquoteright}s (J Educ Meas 50(1):1–73, 2013) notion of argument-based approaches to evaluate the validity of inspection frameworks and provide two examples of how such an argument can be constructed. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 1999; American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 2014) will then be used to describe five types of evidence to evaluate the validity of these arguments. For each of these sources of evidence we present examples of available studies.",

keywords = "Empirical education research, Classroom Observation, Response Process, Inspection System, School Quality, Validity Evidence",

author = "Ehren, {Melanie C. M.} and Marcus Pietsch",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-319-31001-5",

series = "Accountability and Educational Improvement",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

pages = "47--66",

editor = "Ehren, {Melanie C. M.}",

booktitle = "Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections",

address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Validation of Inspection Frameworks and Methods

AU - Ehren, Melanie C. M.

AU - Pietsch, Marcus

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This chapter explores the issues of reliability and validity of inspection frameworks and methods, and challenges and tensions in inspection frameworks and methods. Validity is an important aspect of thinking about effective inspection system as invalid inspection systems may lead to flawed judgments which will misguide administrative interventions and policy decisions and which are likely to have a negative impact on schools and teachers. We will introduce Kane’s (J Educ Meas 50(1):1–73, 2013) notion of argument-based approaches to evaluate the validity of inspection frameworks and provide two examples of how such an argument can be constructed. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 1999; American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 2014) will then be used to describe five types of evidence to evaluate the validity of these arguments. For each of these sources of evidence we present examples of available studies.

AB - This chapter explores the issues of reliability and validity of inspection frameworks and methods, and challenges and tensions in inspection frameworks and methods. Validity is an important aspect of thinking about effective inspection system as invalid inspection systems may lead to flawed judgments which will misguide administrative interventions and policy decisions and which are likely to have a negative impact on schools and teachers. We will introduce Kane’s (J Educ Meas 50(1):1–73, 2013) notion of argument-based approaches to evaluate the validity of inspection frameworks and provide two examples of how such an argument can be constructed. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 1999; American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 2014) will then be used to describe five types of evidence to evaluate the validity of these arguments. For each of these sources of evidence we present examples of available studies.

KW - Empirical education research

KW - Classroom Observation

KW - Response Process

KW - Inspection System

KW - School Quality

KW - Validity Evidence

UR - http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319310015

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-3-319-31001-5

T3 - Accountability and Educational Improvement

SP - 47

EP - 66

BT - Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections

A2 - Ehren, Melanie C. M.

PB - Springer Verlag

CY - Cham

ER -