Typewriting Dynamics: What Distinguishes Simple From Complex Writing Tasks?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Typewriting Dynamics: What Distinguishes Simple From Complex Writing Tasks? / Wallot, Sebastian; Grabowski, Joachim.
In: Ecological Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.07.2013, p. 267-280.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wallot S, Grabowski J. Typewriting Dynamics: What Distinguishes Simple From Complex Writing Tasks? Ecological Psychology. 2013 Jul 1;25(3):267-280. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2013.810512

Bibtex

@article{1e306207eed94cf6947d26dfdb1eeafe,
title = "Typewriting Dynamics: What Distinguishes Simple From Complex Writing Tasks?",
abstract = "One of the main challenges of writing research has been its generative nature. As a production task, writing cannot be controlled as easily as other psychological laboratory tasks, such as reading. In this article, we present an analysis of 3 writing tasks, ranging from a simplified typing task to an ecological writing task. We show that multiple nonlinear metrics can be used to systematically characterize open, complex writing tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate that, when writing performance is quantified in such a way, a continuum of complexity can be identified on which increasingly complex writing performances can be placed.",
keywords = "Psychology",
author = "Sebastian Wallot and Joachim Grabowski",
year = "2013",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10407413.2013.810512",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "267--280",
journal = "Ecological Psychology",
issn = "1040-7413",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Typewriting Dynamics

T2 - What Distinguishes Simple From Complex Writing Tasks?

AU - Wallot, Sebastian

AU - Grabowski, Joachim

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - One of the main challenges of writing research has been its generative nature. As a production task, writing cannot be controlled as easily as other psychological laboratory tasks, such as reading. In this article, we present an analysis of 3 writing tasks, ranging from a simplified typing task to an ecological writing task. We show that multiple nonlinear metrics can be used to systematically characterize open, complex writing tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate that, when writing performance is quantified in such a way, a continuum of complexity can be identified on which increasingly complex writing performances can be placed.

AB - One of the main challenges of writing research has been its generative nature. As a production task, writing cannot be controlled as easily as other psychological laboratory tasks, such as reading. In this article, we present an analysis of 3 writing tasks, ranging from a simplified typing task to an ecological writing task. We show that multiple nonlinear metrics can be used to systematically characterize open, complex writing tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate that, when writing performance is quantified in such a way, a continuum of complexity can be identified on which increasingly complex writing performances can be placed.

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880810572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/85e97798-ea22-3bbe-bf1e-46fbef243504/

U2 - 10.1080/10407413.2013.810512

DO - 10.1080/10407413.2013.810512

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84880810572

VL - 25

SP - 267

EP - 280

JO - Ecological Psychology

JF - Ecological Psychology

SN - 1040-7413

IS - 3

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Lars Hochmann

Publications

  1. Habitat and land-use intensity shape moth community structure across temperate forest and grassland
  2. The “Fragment on Machines” as Science Fiction; Or, Reading the Grundrisse Politically
  3. Expert Consensus Messaging as a Lever Against Vaccination Misinformation
  4. Taking Digital Responsibility for Data
  5. An extended kalman filter for temperature monitoring of a metal-polymer hybrid fibre based heater structure
  6. Post-foundationalism and the Possibility of Critique
  7. Geld-Quartett
  8. Soft spaces across the Fehmarn Belt
  9. Narcissists and their influence on firm performance and reporting practices – a systematic literature review and future research agenda
  10. Physicochemical properties and biodegradability of organically functionalized colloidal silica particles in aqueous environment
  11. Generative AI in teacher education
  12. Über das Essen
  13. Compression behaviour of wire + arc additive manufactured structures
  14. Guest editorial
  15. Agency, values, and well-being
  16. Leading Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation in Schools
  17. Temporary organizing and acceleration
  18. Jointly experimenting for transformation?
  19. Modeling, Identification, and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Towards Industry 4.0
  20. Advanced Controlling - eine Ideenskizze
  21. The importance of understanding the multiple dimensions of power in stakeholder participation for effective biodiversity conservation
  22. Classification of playing position in elite junior Australian football using technical skill indicators
  23. HAWK@QALD5 - Trying to answer hybrid questions with various simple ranking techniques
  24. Building a digital anchor
  25. Adaptive Environments
  26. How Do Negotiators Resolve Conflict Over Resources of Changing Value: The Role of Trust in Sequential Negotiations
  27. Towards a Multi-Level Approach to Studying Entrepreneurship in Professional Services
  28. Evidence on copula-based double-hurdle models with flexible margins
  29. Realist Inquiry
  30. Microstructure by design
  31. The most frequent phrasal verbs in English language EU documents - A corpus-based analysis and its implications
  32. Der „reflective practicioner“