Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios. / Velten, Sarah; Schaal, Tamara; Mildorfová-Leventon, Julia et al.
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 77, 09.2018, p. 84-93.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c4415f449ed8434e94b554130f1507c2,
title = "Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios",
abstract = "Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Biodiversity conservation, Common Agricultural Policy, European Union, Multi-level governance, Scenarios, Transformation",
author = "Sarah Velten and Tamara Schaal and Julia Mildorfov{\'a}-Leventon and Jan Hanspach and J{\"o}rn Fischer and Jens Newig",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios

AU - Velten, Sarah

AU - Schaal, Tamara

AU - Mildorfová-Leventon, Julia

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Fischer, Jörn

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.

AB - Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Common Agricultural Policy

KW - European Union

KW - Multi-level governance

KW - Scenarios

KW - Transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047240926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 77

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Malgorzata Mocak

Publications

  1. Konzeption und Entwurf einer Handelsplattform für Sekundärrohstoffe
  2. Allgemeine Befugnisse und allgemeine Vorschriften (§§ 14–20 BPolG)
  3. Jogos digitais interativos e aplicativos gamificados para a aprendizagem de línguas na era digital
  4. Geschlechtersozialisation in der frühen Kindheit
  5. Erstnachweis der Südlichen Mosaikjungfer Aeshna affinis VAN DER LINDEN 1823 für Schleswig-Holstein (Odonata)
  6. Datenkompetenzen in Kooperationen fördern
  7. Fortentwicklung der Überwachungstätigkeit deutscher Banken-Aufsichtsräte durch die Reformen zur Corporate Governance
  8. Die ostdeutsche Bürgerbewegung als Gegenelite
  9. Gott und Götter in den Weltreligionen
  10. Internationales Steuerrecht
  11. Position des Schutzguts Boden in Recht und Praxis der naturschutzrechtlichen Instrumente
  12. Rassismusforschung in Deutschland. Prekäre Geschichte, strukturelle Probleme, neue Herausforderungen
  13. Social loafing in the refugee crisis
  14. Schutz von Buchenwäldern in einem System von Naturwäldern
  15. Climate change and planning and consultation for the UK aviation white paper
  16. Permanente Temporarität - Brachflächennutzung als Potenzial für den öffentlichen Stadtraum
  17. Kompetenzerfassung als Voraussetzung für Organisations- und Personalentwicklung unter Beachtung verschiedener Menschenbilder
  18. Europäische Strategien zur Reduzierung von Hochwasserrisiko mithilfe eines nachhaltigen Auenmanagements
  19. Begleitforschung zum NRW-Förderprogramm Meistergründungsprämie für Existenzgründungen im nordrhein-westfälischen Handwerk
  20. Schriftliche Stellungnahme
  21. Förderung Benachteiligter in Vergangenheit und Zukunft mit dem Ziel der Berufsausbildung oder der Vorbereitung auf ein Leben in Prekarität?
  22. Ein Zeitfenster für Vielfalt. Chancen für die interkulturelle Öffnung der Verwaltung
  23. Ordnungsverantwortung
  24. Potenziale elektronischer Schulbücher für die muttersprachliche Phraseodidaktik
  25. Rohölmarkt: Iran-Sanktionen dürften zu moderatem Preisanstieg führen
  26. Über den Wolken ...
  27. The resilience of Australian agricultural landscapes characterised by land-sparing versus land-sharing
  28. Wertesysteme von Kulturmanagern
  29. Avaliação da qualidade de drogas vegetais à base de Passiflora spp. comercializadas no Brasil
  30. Ohne Ministerium keine Wende
  31. Vertrag über die Europäische Union : Präambel EUV
  32. Notting Hill Gate 4
  33. Bestimmung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln im Stammablaufwasser von Buchen (Fagus Sylvatica L.)