Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios. / Velten, Sarah; Schaal, Tamara; Mildorfová-Leventon, Julia et al.
in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 77, 09.2018, S. 84-93.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c4415f449ed8434e94b554130f1507c2,
title = "Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios",
abstract = "Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Biodiversity conservation, Common Agricultural Policy, European Union, Multi-level governance, Scenarios, Transformation",
author = "Sarah Velten and Tamara Schaal and Julia Mildorfov{\'a}-Leventon and Jan Hanspach and J{\"o}rn Fischer and Jens Newig",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios

AU - Velten, Sarah

AU - Schaal, Tamara

AU - Mildorfová-Leventon, Julia

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Fischer, Jörn

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.

AB - Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Common Agricultural Policy

KW - European Union

KW - Multi-level governance

KW - Scenarios

KW - Transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047240926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 77

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Kostenloser öffentlicher Nahverkehr
  2. Betriebliche Bündnisse für Arbeit - Ende der Tarifautonomie?
  3. Buch 11. Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in der Europäischen Union
  4. § 257 Aufbewahrung von Unterlagen. Aufbewahrungspflichten
  5. Recht, Fakten und Versicherungen, Teil 1
  6. Von der Sozialwirtschaft zum Public Management
  7. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Rechnungslegung, Abschlussprüfung und Corporate Governance
  8. Direkte Demokratie in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Befunde und Perspektiven des internationalen Vergleichs
  9. Innovation statt Depression - jetzt die Krise nutzen!
  10. Der Betrachter ist im Bild.
  11. The dilemma of incumbents in sustainability transitions
  12. Christian J. Tams, Review of Tommaso Soave. The Everyday Makers of International Law: From Great Halls to Back Rooms
  13. Vorabentscheidungsverfahren, Vorlageverfahren
  14. Neuorientierung der materiellen Bilanzpolitik für den Einzelabschluss
  15. Präventive Diagnostik für Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen auf Basis Probabilistischer und Beschreibungslogischer Verfahren
  16. Externalisierungspolitik als "travelling model"
  17. Finanzielle Bürgerbeteiligung
  18. Netzwerkbasierte Betrachtung von ko-konstruktiven Interaktionsprozessen im Unterricht – Ein Ansatz zur Beschreibung und Analyse von Angebot und Nutzung
  19. Teilhabe behinderter Menschen am Arbeitsleben: Allgemeine Leistungen
  20. Einleitung: Das Projekt "Bildungsinstitutionen und nachhaltiger Konsum" (BINK)
  21. Demographischer Wandel und Konsumentenverhalten im Tourismus
  22. Politikdidaktische Hermeneutik als Instrument der qualitativen Unterrichtsforschung
  23. Gesetz über Unterlassungsklagen bei Verbraucherrechts- und anderen Verstößen (UKlaG)
  24. Begleitforschung zum NRW-Förderprogramm Meistergründungsprämie für Existenzgründungen im nordrhein-westfälischen Handwerk
  25. Innovative Museums- und Besucherforschung
  26. Fotografie als illegitime Kunst
  27. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft
  28. Nachhaltigkeit und Geschlechtergerechtigkeit