Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios. / Velten, Sarah; Schaal, Tamara; Mildorfová-Leventon, Julia et al.
in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 77, 09.2018, S. 84-93.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c4415f449ed8434e94b554130f1507c2,
title = "Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios",
abstract = "Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Biodiversity conservation, Common Agricultural Policy, European Union, Multi-level governance, Scenarios, Transformation",
author = "Sarah Velten and Tamara Schaal and Julia Mildorfov{\'a}-Leventon and Jan Hanspach and J{\"o}rn Fischer and Jens Newig",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios

AU - Velten, Sarah

AU - Schaal, Tamara

AU - Mildorfová-Leventon, Julia

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Fischer, Jörn

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.

AB - Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes continues to be a key challenge in the European Union (EU). However, to date the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is central for addressing this issue, has proven ineffective in improving biodiversity outcomes. In contrast to solutions that focus on individual policies or measures, we take a holistic approach to explore changes in the broader governance system for biodiversity conservation. For this purpose, we draw on a set of four theoretical, ideal-typical scenarios which represent alternative governance approaches and used them to stimulate discussion about the acceptability of contrasting governance approaches among a broad range of actors in three case study areas in Germany and Sweden. Our results highlight that acceptability of alternative governance approaches is shaped by a large variety of factors. Additionally, despite differences between the views and interests of different stakeholder groups, our findings show universal support for governance approaches that fundamentally differ from the status quo approaches. Thus, evaluating and addressing acceptability of alternative governance approaches needs to consider the preferences of many different stakeholders and requires a more holistic perspective. We therefore argue that designing a potentially widely acceptable alternative governance solution for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes requires a blend of different governance approaches. We outline principles that can guide the design of such a blended governance approach and discuss key challenges arising from the suggested changes for both practitioners and future research.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Common Agricultural Policy

KW - European Union

KW - Multi-level governance

KW - Scenarios

KW - Transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047240926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 77

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. How do secondary seed dispersal and post-dispersal seed predation influence the successful recruitment of common grassland species?
  2. Risk and time preferences under complex spatio-temporal risk conditions – experimental and survey evidence from semi-arid rangelands
  3. Profilstudium schulische Inklusion – Eine Spezialisierungsmöglichkeit für angehende Lehrkräfte an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
  4. Academic Committee of the China’s Research Center for Economic Transition an der Beijing University of Technology (Externe Organisation)
  5. Geben Plattformen CrowdworkerInnen eine Stimme? Eine explorative Studie zur CrowdworkerInnen-Partizipation auf Crowdsourcing-Plattformen
  6. Current Developments in Environmental Management Accounting: Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting
  7. Treffen der SIG Forschung und SIG Qualität und Professionsentwicklung der Gesellschaft für Schreibdidaktik und Schreibforschung - 2019
  8. How can corporate social responsibility (CSR) gain relevance in internal communication? A network perspective on communication processes
  9. Stretching, shrinking, shape-shifting: a processual and communication-centred perspective on the elasticity and boundedness of organization
  10. The use of digital communication media in cross-border knowledge transfer processes: A competitive advantage for multinational companies?
  11. Developing Strategies Against the Risks of Severe Storm Surges: Opportunities for the Integration of Different Stakeholder Perspectives
  12. Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more: A methodological framework for ventriloquial analyses in organization studies

Publikationen

  1. Reading instruction in 5th grade: teachers’ perspectives on promoting self-regulated reading in language and content area teaching
  2. Wagnis Wildnis, Wildnisentwicklung und Wildnisbildung in Mitteleuropa, (hrsg.) Herbert Zucchi, Paul Stegmann: München oekom verlag, 2006
  3. Exploring the potential of using priority effects during ecological restoration to resist biological invasions in the neotropics
  4. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung von Anpassungsstrategien an den Klimawandel für die Überflutungsflächen an der unteren Mittelelbe.
  5. Decisions And Characteristics During The Development Process Of A Software Demonstrator For Data Analysis In Production Logistics
  6. Callings and work engagement: Moderated mediation model of work meaningfulness, occupational identity, and occupational self-efficacy
  7. Dialogorientierte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung von Hochschulen : eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Leuphana-Universität Lüneburg
  8. Schindler, Jörg; Held, Martin (unter Mitarbeit von Gerd Würdemann) (2009): Postfossile Mobilität. Wegweiser für die Zeit nach dem Peak Oil
  9. European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on the quality of eMental health interventions in the treatment of psychotic disorders
  10. Künstliche Feuchtflächen in Hochwasserrückhaltebecken – eine Chance für die Reduzierung von Pflanzenschutzmitteleinträgen in Gewässer
  11. Orientierende Untersuchungen von NSO-Heterocyclen in niedersächsischen Oberflächengewässern – Betrachtung von Sediment und Wasserphase