Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions: evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM)

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions: evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM). / Lückgen, Ingo; Wagner, Joachim.
Lüneburg: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, 2004. (Arbeitsbericht; No. 327).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Lückgen, I & Wagner, J 2004 'Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions: evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM)' Arbeitsbericht, no. 327, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg.

APA

Lückgen, I., & Wagner, J. (2004). Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions: evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM). (Arbeitsbericht; No. 327). Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg.

Vancouver

Lückgen I, Wagner J. Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions: evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM). Lüneburg: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg. 2004. (Arbeitsbericht; 327).

Bibtex

@techreport{aba23ea363124416ad2627b5ce2eba3b,
title = "Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions: evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM)",
abstract = "Nascent entrepreneurs are people who are (alone or with others) actively engaged in creating a new venture, and who expect to be the owner or part owner of this start-up. Recently, an increasing number of empirical studies deals with the impacts of start-up activities on economic development of nations (Wong, Ho and Autio forthcoming; van Stel, Carree and Thurik forthcoming) and subnational regions (Acs and Armington, 2004; Fritsch and Mueller, 2004). Obviously different types of entrepreneurial activities may have different impacts on economic growth. Especially high growth potential entrepreneurship is found to have a significant (positive) impact on the dependent variables of economic growth in economically advanced countries. Given that newly founded firms are important for the economic development of nations and regions, and that nascent entrepreneurs are by definition important for the foundation of new firms, information about nascent entrepreneurs is important for understanding crucial aspects of the economy. This information, however, can not be found in publications from official statistics. Until the turn of the millennium, therefore, we knew next to nothing about nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. The situation improved considerably when results from the first German wave of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey became available in 19991. The GEM project, however, is focused on variations of entrepreneurial activity between entire countries. The relevance of detailed information on nascent entrepreneurs at the regional level, and the lack of it for Germany, led us to start the research project Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM) Germany in 2000. As part of this project, we performed a representative survey of the adult population in ten German regions, plus a survey and interviews with local experts in the field of entrepreneurship. A second wave followed in 2003. This paper summarizes our findings using data from these surveys and interviews.",
keywords = "Economics, Deutschland , Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung , Unternehmensgr{\"u}ndung , Regionale Wirtschaftsstruktur , Entrepreneurial Activity, Nascent Entrepreneur, Young Firm, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, German Region",
author = "Ingo L{\"u}ckgen and Joachim Wagner",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
series = "Arbeitsbericht",
publisher = "Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",
number = "327",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions

T2 - evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM)

AU - Lückgen, Ingo

AU - Wagner, Joachim

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Nascent entrepreneurs are people who are (alone or with others) actively engaged in creating a new venture, and who expect to be the owner or part owner of this start-up. Recently, an increasing number of empirical studies deals with the impacts of start-up activities on economic development of nations (Wong, Ho and Autio forthcoming; van Stel, Carree and Thurik forthcoming) and subnational regions (Acs and Armington, 2004; Fritsch and Mueller, 2004). Obviously different types of entrepreneurial activities may have different impacts on economic growth. Especially high growth potential entrepreneurship is found to have a significant (positive) impact on the dependent variables of economic growth in economically advanced countries. Given that newly founded firms are important for the economic development of nations and regions, and that nascent entrepreneurs are by definition important for the foundation of new firms, information about nascent entrepreneurs is important for understanding crucial aspects of the economy. This information, however, can not be found in publications from official statistics. Until the turn of the millennium, therefore, we knew next to nothing about nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. The situation improved considerably when results from the first German wave of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey became available in 19991. The GEM project, however, is focused on variations of entrepreneurial activity between entire countries. The relevance of detailed information on nascent entrepreneurs at the regional level, and the lack of it for Germany, led us to start the research project Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM) Germany in 2000. As part of this project, we performed a representative survey of the adult population in ten German regions, plus a survey and interviews with local experts in the field of entrepreneurship. A second wave followed in 2003. This paper summarizes our findings using data from these surveys and interviews.

AB - Nascent entrepreneurs are people who are (alone or with others) actively engaged in creating a new venture, and who expect to be the owner or part owner of this start-up. Recently, an increasing number of empirical studies deals with the impacts of start-up activities on economic development of nations (Wong, Ho and Autio forthcoming; van Stel, Carree and Thurik forthcoming) and subnational regions (Acs and Armington, 2004; Fritsch and Mueller, 2004). Obviously different types of entrepreneurial activities may have different impacts on economic growth. Especially high growth potential entrepreneurship is found to have a significant (positive) impact on the dependent variables of economic growth in economically advanced countries. Given that newly founded firms are important for the economic development of nations and regions, and that nascent entrepreneurs are by definition important for the foundation of new firms, information about nascent entrepreneurs is important for understanding crucial aspects of the economy. This information, however, can not be found in publications from official statistics. Until the turn of the millennium, therefore, we knew next to nothing about nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. The situation improved considerably when results from the first German wave of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey became available in 19991. The GEM project, however, is focused on variations of entrepreneurial activity between entire countries. The relevance of detailed information on nascent entrepreneurs at the regional level, and the lack of it for Germany, led us to start the research project Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM) Germany in 2000. As part of this project, we performed a representative survey of the adult population in ten German regions, plus a survey and interviews with local experts in the field of entrepreneurship. A second wave followed in 2003. This paper summarizes our findings using data from these surveys and interviews.

KW - Economics

KW - Deutschland

KW - Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung

KW - Unternehmensgründung

KW - Regionale Wirtschaftsstruktur

KW - Entrepreneurial Activity

KW - Nascent Entrepreneur

KW - Young Firm

KW - Global Entrepreneurship Monitor

KW - German Region

M3 - Working papers

T3 - Arbeitsbericht

BT - Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions

PB - Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg

CY - Lüneburg

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Sustainable and Social Entrepreneurship
  2. Bestandssenkungspotential durch Einsatz moderner Verfahen der dynamischen Materialdisposition im Fertigungsbereich, dargestellt an einem praktischen Beispiel aus der Automobilindustrie
  3. Grundkurs Filmanalyse
  4. PISAs Folgen
  5. Schreiben im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule – Sprachkompetenz diagnostizieren und fördern
  6. Business Cases for Sustainability
  7. Stützlehrer als neuer pädagogischer Profi in der Beruflichen Bildung.
  8. Rezension zu: Otto, Hans-Uwe / Polutta, Andreas / Ziegler, Holger (Hg.): Evidence-based Practice – Modernising the Knowledge Base of Social Work?. Opladen: Barbara Budrich 2009
  9. A caring and sustainable economy
  10. Democratic Aspiration Meets Political Reality
  11. The interplay of social rank perceptions of Trump and Biden and emotions following the U.S. presidential election 2020
  12. Praxisphasen im Lehramtsstudium mit Schwerpunkt auf der Einbindung neu zugewanderter Schülerinnen und Schüler
  13. Wasted money, wasted time?
  14. Artikel 43 EUV [Missionen der GSVPl]
  15. Entrance fees as a subjective barrier to visiting museums
  16. Jugendliche im Web 2.0: Risiken und Chancen
  17. Diesseits und jenseits der Worte
  18. Kommentierung von Art. 16 GG: Staatsangehörigkeit, Auslieferung
  19. Stille Filme sind tief
  20. Gründungsforschungs-Forum 2001
  21. Interaktionssignale, Formen und Funktionen in mündlicher Kommunikation
  22. GRAMSCI CON FOUCAULT FILOSOFIA DELLA PRASSI COME ANALISI STRATEGICA
  23. The Melodrama
  24. Das Bild zum Empfang
  25. Der Beitrag der Social Media zur Partizipation
  26. Innovative Ertragsstrategien als Herausforderung der Banken
  27. Fehlentscheidungen
  28. Kommunales Ehrenamt
  29. Institutionelle Friedenssicherung
  30. Klassiker und Kanon
  31. Denn die Geschichten der Opfer sind das Wichtigste
  32. Militanz, Blues und Stadtguerilla
  33. Zur Relevanz von Bestandseffekten und der Fundamentalen Transformation in wiederholten Biodiversitätsschutz-Aussschreibungen
  34. Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research
  35. Rechtliche Instrumente zur Verbesserung der Energienutzung