Efficacy of internet-based guided treatment for genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder: Rationale, treatment protocol, and design of a randomized controlled trial

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Efficacy of internet-based guided treatment for genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder : Rationale, treatment protocol, and design of a randomized controlled trial. / Zarski, Anna Carlotta; Berking, Matthias; Ebert, David Daniel.

In: Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 8, No. JAN, 260, 22.01.2018.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a1fdfd46ecfe412e893b0fcdd29cfe3d,
title = "Efficacy of internet-based guided treatment for genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder: Rationale, treatment protocol, and design of a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Introduction: Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) not only adversely affects women{\textquoteright}s sexuality and sexual satisfaction but is also associated with a wide range of psychosocial consequences such as reduced quality of life and well-being, mental health comorbidities, and relationship distress. Evidence for effective treatment options is scarce.Aim: This article describes the rationale, treatment protocol, and study design for a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of an Internet-based guided intervention for GPPPD.Method: Two hundred women who meet the criteria for GPPPD and have not been able to experience sexual intercourse for at least the last 6 months will be recruited and randomly assigned either to the intervention group (IG) or a 6-month waitlist control group. Assessments take place at baseline (T1), peritreatment after completion of Session 5 in IG (T2), after completion of Session 8 or 12 weeks after randomization (T3), and after 6 months (T4). Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat and a completer basis.Main outcome measures: The primary outcome will be sexual intercourse involving the insertion of the partner{\textquoteright}s penis at posttreatment. Secondary outcomes include, e.g., improved non-intercourse penetration, sexual functioning, dyadic stress coping, reduced fear of sexuality and negative penetration-related cognitions. Fear of sexuality, penetration-related cognitions, and exercise intensity will be assessed as mediators of intercourse in the IG. Sexual dysfunctions of partners will be measured at baseline (T1) and investigated as a potential moderator of the primary treatment outcome.Discussion: Given the burden associated with GPPPD and the need for specialized treatment, there is a surprising lack of evidence-based treatment options. This study aims to assess whether Internet-based interventions could contribute to closing this treatment gap.",
keywords = "Dyspareunia, Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder, Internet intervention, Randomized controlled trial, Sexual dysfunction, Vaginismus, Psychology",
author = "Zarski, {Anna Carlotta} and Matthias Berking and Ebert, {David Daniel}",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "22",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00260",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychiatry",
issn = "1664-0640",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "JAN",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of internet-based guided treatment for genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder

T2 - Rationale, treatment protocol, and design of a randomized controlled trial

AU - Zarski, Anna Carlotta

AU - Berking, Matthias

AU - Ebert, David Daniel

PY - 2018/1/22

Y1 - 2018/1/22

N2 - Introduction: Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) not only adversely affects women’s sexuality and sexual satisfaction but is also associated with a wide range of psychosocial consequences such as reduced quality of life and well-being, mental health comorbidities, and relationship distress. Evidence for effective treatment options is scarce.Aim: This article describes the rationale, treatment protocol, and study design for a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of an Internet-based guided intervention for GPPPD.Method: Two hundred women who meet the criteria for GPPPD and have not been able to experience sexual intercourse for at least the last 6 months will be recruited and randomly assigned either to the intervention group (IG) or a 6-month waitlist control group. Assessments take place at baseline (T1), peritreatment after completion of Session 5 in IG (T2), after completion of Session 8 or 12 weeks after randomization (T3), and after 6 months (T4). Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat and a completer basis.Main outcome measures: The primary outcome will be sexual intercourse involving the insertion of the partner’s penis at posttreatment. Secondary outcomes include, e.g., improved non-intercourse penetration, sexual functioning, dyadic stress coping, reduced fear of sexuality and negative penetration-related cognitions. Fear of sexuality, penetration-related cognitions, and exercise intensity will be assessed as mediators of intercourse in the IG. Sexual dysfunctions of partners will be measured at baseline (T1) and investigated as a potential moderator of the primary treatment outcome.Discussion: Given the burden associated with GPPPD and the need for specialized treatment, there is a surprising lack of evidence-based treatment options. This study aims to assess whether Internet-based interventions could contribute to closing this treatment gap.

AB - Introduction: Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) not only adversely affects women’s sexuality and sexual satisfaction but is also associated with a wide range of psychosocial consequences such as reduced quality of life and well-being, mental health comorbidities, and relationship distress. Evidence for effective treatment options is scarce.Aim: This article describes the rationale, treatment protocol, and study design for a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of an Internet-based guided intervention for GPPPD.Method: Two hundred women who meet the criteria for GPPPD and have not been able to experience sexual intercourse for at least the last 6 months will be recruited and randomly assigned either to the intervention group (IG) or a 6-month waitlist control group. Assessments take place at baseline (T1), peritreatment after completion of Session 5 in IG (T2), after completion of Session 8 or 12 weeks after randomization (T3), and after 6 months (T4). Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat and a completer basis.Main outcome measures: The primary outcome will be sexual intercourse involving the insertion of the partner’s penis at posttreatment. Secondary outcomes include, e.g., improved non-intercourse penetration, sexual functioning, dyadic stress coping, reduced fear of sexuality and negative penetration-related cognitions. Fear of sexuality, penetration-related cognitions, and exercise intensity will be assessed as mediators of intercourse in the IG. Sexual dysfunctions of partners will be measured at baseline (T1) and investigated as a potential moderator of the primary treatment outcome.Discussion: Given the burden associated with GPPPD and the need for specialized treatment, there is a surprising lack of evidence-based treatment options. This study aims to assess whether Internet-based interventions could contribute to closing this treatment gap.

KW - Dyspareunia

KW - Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder

KW - Internet intervention

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Sexual dysfunction

KW - Vaginismus

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040814576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00260

DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00260

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 29403395

AN - SCOPUS:85040814576

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry

JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry

SN - 1664-0640

IS - JAN

M1 - 260

ER -

Documents

DOI